By Rich Lowry
Tuesday, June 17, 2025
Who is that masked man? Well, there’s a chance he’s an antisemitic rioter.
New York City and other jurisdictions are debating mask
bans after face coverings have become associated
with acts of mayhem committed by people who hope to avoid recognition and evade
criminal responsibility.
The most iconic image of the L.A. riots involves a man on
a dirt bike waving a Mexican flag . . . in a mask.
It’s no surprise that he was wearing a mask. At this
point, failing to wear a mask when engaging in lawless activity is a major faux
pas. It’s like wearing white before Memorial Day, or showing up at L.A.’s
upscale restaurant, 71Above, in flip-flops.
Embattled New York City Mayor Eric Adams has been
emphatic that there needs to be a return to the broad ban on masks that was
repealed during the pandemic (the state just passed a more limited measure
creating enhanced penalties for people wearing masks to conceal their
identities while committing crimes).
The meaning of the mask has changed in recent years.
Before Covid, wearing a surgical mask in public likely meant someone had a
compromised immune system; during Covid, it usually meant someone was complying
with the pandemic rules and associated social pressure; after Covid, it tends
to indicate either someone is too neurotic to give up pandemic-era practices —
or wants to harass Jews or throw rocks at the cops.
In an era of ubiquitous facial recognition technology, a
face mask is a bid to foil efforts by police to track down, after the fact,
those who committed criminal acts. It’s not a get-out-of-jail card — masked
rioters are sometimes arrested on the spot — but it’s a layer of protection for
the person hoping to break or burn something and melt away without consequence.
This is why, prior to Covid, masks outside of a medical
context tended to have a negative connotation in the popular imagination. The
Lone Ranger was the exception that proved the rule. Otherwise, the masked man
was going to hold up the stagecoach, rob a bank, or burn a cross on someone’s
lawn.
A 1990 Georgia supreme court ruling upholding a mask ban
said, “A nameless, faceless figure strikes terror in the human heart.”
Certainly, after seeing what’s gone down on the streets
after the killing of George Floyd and on the campuses since October 7, 2023,
everyone should be on edge when encountering masked protesters. If nothing
else, it’s not reassuring when people are afraid of being associated with their
own cause or the means with which they are going to agitate for it.
New York first banned masks in the 1840s in response to
protesters harassing landlords. Later, in the 20th century, states prohibited
face coverings to address the depredations of the KKK.
The bans were either not enforced or repealed during
Covid. Masks went from being a symbol of outlaw behavior to becoming the sine
qua non of good citizenship, according to Dr. Fauci and other public-health
authorities. The snugly fitted N95 or, even better, an elastomeric respirator
with replaceable filters showed a heroic commitment to your own health and the
well-being of others.
The clashing perspective of the last two governors of New
York indicates how the debate on masks has turned. Then-Governor Andrew Cuomo
in 2020 urged protesters to mask up. “You have a right to demonstrate,” he
declared. “You don’t have a right to infect other people.” Cuomo’s successor,
Governor Kathy Hochul, went in the opposite direction after seeing masked
protesters menace Jewish riders on the subway last year. She came out in favor
of restricting masks and supports the watered-down change recently passed by
the legislature.
With a long, hot summer in the offing, the issue won’t go
away in New York, or anywhere else. The mask is now part of the kit of rioters,
as useful, indispensable, and emblematic as a Klansman’s white hood.
No comments:
Post a Comment