By Noah Rothman
Thursday, August 27, 2026
Over a year after the self-consciously anti-partisan
think tank Third Way warned Democrats against adopting the left-wing
newspeak native to the American faculty lounge — “hiding behind unfamiliar
phrases to mask extreme intent,” in its memo’s terms — Democrats are still
doing it.
The list of words Third Way would banish from Democratic
mouths was overbroad. Sure, “chest feeding,” “heteronormativity,” and “holding
space” should meet the chopping block, but there’s nothing wrong with using
“heuristic” as long as you’re describing a process of reasoning and not trying
to verbally muscle your interlocutor into submission.
As Axios reported on Thursday, however, many of the phrases
the think tank tried to anathematize are still with us. Its report chides
Democratic lawmakers for still calling mothers “birthing individuals.” They’re
still describing the homeless as “unhoused people.” They persist in their
efforts to replace “felon” and “convict” with “criminal-justice impacted
individual.” And they’re doing so even though they know they shouldn’t.
The reason Democrats resist this obvious imperative is
contained within Axios’s report. They might know they have to change, but they
resent it.
Axios reporter Mike Zapler admits that this language is
“natural in liberal spaces.” The patois of the professorate was “created for
the right reasons,” Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear sympathetically intoned. The
whole enterprise was just an “effort to show more cultural sensitivity,” but it
was “easily weaponized by Republicans.” Poor, Democrats.
So, the problem Third Way set out to identify endures.
And it endures because the left’s linguistic signifiers are only a symptom of
it. The real problem is that this language is designed to render their
speakers “foreign,” as Axios put it, to most Americans. It marks its user as
apart, distant, or even entirely removed from broader American culture, perhaps
because that culture is irredeemable. These aren’t expressions of empathy for a
select few but, rather, contempt for everyone else.
As I wrote a year ago, what Third Way tried to put its finger on was the distaste for American common culture conveyed within the subtext of the words they use in place of everyday vernacular. “The words they use to convey that animus are truly secondary.”
No comments:
Post a Comment