By Noah Rothman
Friday, August 28, 2026
There was a perceptible hint in dispatches from CNN and the Wall Street Journal over the last two weeks that their
journalists couldn’t believe their own reporting. Could it be that the
president had accidentally backed into a strategy to throttle Iran into
submission that’s actually working?
Perhaps. Axios’s reporting on Friday lends credence to that
tentative conclusion. According to U.S. officials, Iran has “lost much of its
control over” the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian forces can still fire on the
vessels that attempt to transit the strait via the U.S.-guarded Omani channel,
but its targeting capabilities are significantly degraded. Just 2 percent of
the ships that traversed the strait were attacked, U.S. officials contend.
In addition, obstacles placed in the strait by Iran have
largely been cleared. “More than 200 mine-like objects have been swept from the
main lane of the strait,” the Axios report said. “U.S. officials say
only 11 of them were actual mines and just a few were properly deployed.” As a
consequence, traffic through the strait ballooned in August, with roughly 9–10
million barrels of oil flowing through it.
CENTCOM Commander Admiral Brad Cooper provides some
details:
Private energy trackers cannot confirm the
administration’s figures, in part because much of this traffic is deliberately
invisible. As the Journal admitted, some private trackers’ estimates run
“closer to the administration’s numbers,” and Goldman Sachs analysts revealed Thursday that oil traffic
out of the strait is about two-thirds of the way to the pre-war average rate.
Maybe the most interesting part of the Axios report
is its suggestion that Trump’s blockade may be weakening the rump Iranian
regime’s commitment to resistance: “Two regional sources told Axios that
in recent days Iran has shown renewed interest in negotiations.” If the regime
is feeling the pain, that’s likely a reflection of the hardships endured by the
Iranian people.
For months, the American press has covered the conflict
in the strait as though America were at war with itself. Only recently have
American media outlets tuned in to the increasingly dire conditions on the
ground inside Iran. What they’re seeing explains why the regime needs to upend
the status quo.
A separate Journal dispatch on Friday revealed that protests of
the sort that rocked the regime to its core in December of last year are
popping up again, albeit on a smaller scale. Iranians are hoarding gasoline as
the regime flirts with withdrawing petrol subsidies. Supermarkets in Tehran ran
out of staples like rice and cooking oil this week. “The risk of shortage tied
to U.S. sanctions threats has triggered panic,” one Iranian translator told
reporters. Where goods are available, they’re impossibly expensive. The Iranian
rial is now trading at a historic low against the dollar, and its value is
falling fast. “Meat is often bought on credit, repaid in installments with
interest,” the Journal reported.
NPR’s “view from Tehran” is just as dire. Its reporters found that
medical services inside Iran, even in relatively posh Tehran, are breaking
down. NPR’s piece strongly implies that the regime or its affiliates have begun
appropriating the savings from individual bank depositors. One woman, “who
works as a baker and caterer, says when she went to the bank over the weekend,
she learned that her account was blocked with nearly $1,000 missing,” the
dispatch recounted. “Bank associates told her the bank had been hacked, though
didn’t say by whom.”
Where groceries can be found, they are prohibitively
expensive. And any Iranian engaged in commerce has seen their overhead costs
increase by as much as four times the pre-war baseline. As one Iranian trader
told NPR, “the blockade is worse than the war.”
The Iranian people’s anxiety is raising fears inside the
country that a new round of protests is imminent. A public statement from the
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Intelligence Organization this week warned
that rising social discontent could give way to unrest.
“The statement said the IRGC was prioritizing efforts to
confront actions it considered disruptive to public order, national solidarity,
and cohesion,” Radio Free Europe reported:
The IRGC said its
perceived adversaries were using tactics including the activation of crisis
centers, psychological warfare, turmoil in monetary and financial markets, and
anti-security operations. It also accused them of exploiting domestic
weaknesses and shortages and encouraging public dissatisfaction to spread into
the streets.
Regional experts and security analysts all but
universally caution against optimism. They say there are no indications that
the revolutionary regime’s cosseted leadership is sensitive to the public’s
plight and little evidence to suggest that economic pressure can do to the
regime what the liberal application of air power could not. Perhaps they’re
right. But the conditions on the ground inside Iran are intolerable.
Something has to give.
No comments:
Post a Comment