National Review Online
Monday, August 31, 2026
A heavily indebted debtor is not well-advised to be seen
to play games with his creditors, and that was what Treasury Secretary Scott
Bessent was widely perceived to have done a couple weeks ago. Yields on 30-year
Treasuries had been trending up for some time and had reached 5.33
percent, their highest level since 2001 (a number worth watching by mortgage
borrowers too). And so the Treasury announced (choosing unusual timing given
the refunding cycle) that it would be buying longer bonds with
short-term maturities. This only had a brief effect on the 30-years. It took a
second announcement doubling the size of the proposed buyback to make a
somewhat more lasting dent, possibly helped by a slight easing of oil prices.
The yield on the 30-years is around 5.19 now. Was the Treasury playing games in order to
nudge long-term rates down a little?
Quite a few thought so, including,
awkwardly, Stanley Druckenmiller, a billionaire investor who was once a mentor to Bessent. He dismissed the Treasury’s argument
that this was nothing more than “liquidity management.” Rather, he argued, the
Treasury was undertaking price management, something very different. As
Friedrich Hayek argued years ago, monkeying around with prices rarely ends
well.
Adding to suspicions that this might have been going on
were the president’s well-known views on interest rates, doubtless sharpened by
the upcoming midterms. Memories were also fresh of the Treasury’s intervention
(using euros) in support of the ailing
yen at the end of July. This had raised eyebrows, as the U.S. rarely
intervenes to support a foreign currency. The last time the Treasury was
involved in propping up the yen was during the Asian financial crisis, although
it did try to help cap the rise in the Japanese currency after the Fukushima
disaster (when there had been expectations that a lot of money would return to
Japan).
Bessent later tied the Treasury’s most recent intervention to fears of
the “forced unwinds” (of financial positions) that could be triggered by
disorderly yen markets. This could “destabilize global markets and ultimately
raise borrowing costs for American families and businesses.” He also noted,
among other matters, that Japan is a “major holder of U.S. Treasuries.” Those
are not unreasonable arguments, and far from underhanded, although Bessent
might have been franker (if, perhaps, too frank) to specify that among those
borrowers about whom he was concerned was Uncle Sam. In 2025, interest expense
amounted to 15 percent of federal spending, a number that is set to be
boosted further by persistent deficits, the dark magic of compounding, and the
higher interest rates that those facts all call for. Any difference that the
cost of AI-related borrowing may be making to rates may be a nice excuse, but
any effect is probably at the margin. One thing, however, that is as
close to certain as anything can be is that the low interest rates of the
previous decade are gone for the foreseeable future. Another is that the
reversal of anything that was left of the peace dividend has further to go.
The unfortunate reality is that so long as the U.S. keeps
piling up more debt, there is only so much that clever maneuvers can do to ease
the costs and vulnerabilities that go with it. Creditors won’t take any
positive effect of the proposed buybacks on yields as an indication of better
times to come and, worse still, may well regard them as a warning sign. Their
effect won’t last for long and will be outweighed by inflation concerns, as,
indeed, Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh is clearly signaling. It was telling that his hawkish words
did more to discourage gold bulls (for now) than Bessent’s buyback plans.
To be clear (not that it should be necessary), a failure
to be seen as taking inflation seriously would in due course be expected to
push yields higher: Investors tend to put a higher sticker price for lending to
a depreciating currency, and, adding to the pressure, more of the marginal
buyers appear to be moving speculative funds quicker than in the past.
One way or another, the debt, starting with the deficit,
has to be tamed.
No comments:
Post a Comment