Thursday, June 4, 2026

Scott Pelley’s Left-Wing Bias Was Clear Long Before His Firing from 60 Minutes

By Kaitlyn Kiepert

Thursday, June 04, 2026

 

Scott Pelley’s 37-year career with CBS News ended on Tuesday after the 60 Minutes correspondent accused Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss of “murdering” the newsmagazine.

 

After a long career at CBS, Pelley’s downfall came as he resisted changes by Weiss and other new leaders who sought to return an air of objectivity to the program.

 

“You hijacked my first meeting with staff to disparage me, my qualifications, and my intentions with remarkable incivility and contempt,” wrote 60 Minutes’ new executive producer, Nick Bilton, in Pelley’s letter of termination. “I am here to deliver first-in-class news programming, not to make headlines about newsroom drama.”

 

Bilton, a British-American journalist with a background in film but not in television news, was appointed the newsmagazine’s new executive producer on May 28. Pelley met the new hire with hostility, having been a supporter of former executive producer Tanya Simon, who was fired that same day.

 

Bilton’s appointment was the final straw for Pelley amid a tense season at CBS as he and many of his fellow veteran reporters resisted Weiss’s new aims.

 

“60 Minutes lost its DNA when our entire senior leadership and two of our best on-air correspondents were cruelly fired without cause,” he wrote in a letter after being fired. “Good people were silenced because they stood up for our audience. They stood for fairness against the forces of political bias; they stood for professionalism against chaos.”

 

“For my part, new management has instructed me to inject falsehoods and bias into a politically sensitive story,” he said. “I’ve been told to include assertions that are unverified.”

 

But despite claims that she aims to shift CBS to the political right, Weiss is a self-identified “left-leaning centrist” whose stated goal is to serve the forgotten majority of Americans who are neither part of “an America-loathing far left” nor a “history-erasing far right” and have been ill-served.

 

In attempting to achieve that mission, she set out ten “core journalistic values” when she took over the news network last year, including the goal of holding “both American political parties to equal scrutiny” and a promise to report on the world “as it actually is.”

 

But Pelley and others at the program had gotten comfortable injecting their own left-wing biases into 60 Minutes.

 

Pelley made clear his political positions and his distaste for President Trump on many occasions.

 

On March 4, 2025, Pelley interviewed Marc Elias, the elections and voting rights attorney who defended the Biden administration and Democratic National Committee in lawsuits brought by President Trump over the 2020 election results. Pelley introduced the program with a statement aimed directly at the Trump administration: “It was nearly impossible to get anyone on camera for this story because of the fear now running through our system of justice,” Pelley said.

 

“[D]espite being a target,” the 60 Minutes Facebook page announced, “Mark Elias is still talking.” Many of the network’s left-wing viewers applauded Elias as a “hero” and celebrated his “very brave 60 minutes,” while critics were quick to point out the show’s bias toward Democrats.

 

Pelley’s attacks on Trump were even more direct one month prior, during a 60 Minutes program on the dismantling of USAID.

 

Aired on February 16, 2025, the program opened with a direct reproach of the president. “It’s too soon to tell how serious President Trump is in defiance of the Constitution,” Pelley said. “Presidents often push limits — FDR’s New Deal, for example — and voters in this last election wanted change. But the scope and speed of Trump’s reach for power may be unprecedented.”

 

The program also targeted Elon Musk, accusing him of exorbitant spending and unwarranted job cuts.

 

Following the 2024 election, Pelley’s November 17, 2024, program was widely criticized for its overt rebuke of Republicans. “This past week, Republicans won the House majority and President-elect Trump made nominations to his Cabinet,” he said. “Some nominees appear to have no compelling qualifications other than loyalty to Trump.”

 

By the end of the update, his tone was outright skeptical. “It’s up to the new Republican majority in the Senate to decide whether these nominees are equipped to represent the American people,” he said. “It seems hard to remember when America was united.”

 

And in March 2025, Pelley delivered an anti-Trump commencement address at Wake Forest Academy. In it, he compared modern America to George Orwell’s dystopia in 1984 and encouraged the graduates to fight against the fear stirred up by modern American leaders.

 

“‘Diversity’ is now described as ‘illegal.’ ‘Equity’ is to be shunned,” he said. “‘Inclusion’ is a dirty word. This is an old playbook, my friends. There is nothing new in this.”

 

But Pelley failed to use that same critical tone when reporting on President Biden.

 

Following Hamas’s October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, Pelley met with then-President Joe Biden during his October 15 60 Minutes program. “Rarely does a president confront so much peril; the catastrophe in Israel — the war in Ukraine — and no help from a paralyzed Congress,” Pelley said, opening the program. Pelley acknowledged Biden’s apparent weariness but attributed his physical exhaustion and “life-long stutter” to the pressure of politics.

 

Pelley had also raised the subject of Biden’s age and general exhaustion during a 60 Minutes interview with Biden a year earlier, even going so far as to ask, “How would you say your mental focus is?”

 

Biden’s reply was indistinct. “I’d say it’s– I think it’s– I– I haven’t– look, I have trouble even mentioning, even saying to myself, my own head, the number of years. I no more think of myself as being as old as I am than fly,” he said.

 

Pelley turned away from the opportunity to press Biden on his slowly-delivered rambling, choosing to instead move on to discuss Biden’s “string of legislative successes” and his approval ratings.

No comments: