By Kevin D. Williamson
Friday, June 19, 2026
J.D. Vance’s conversion story is bulls–t.
No surprise there: His last conversion story was bulls–t,
too.
The only halfway interesting part is that both stories
turn out to be the same bulls–t: Vance’s story—once again—is that he put
his faith in the wrong people and institutions and discovered the error of his
ways at precisely the moment when doing so would do the most to advance his
career.
Saul had his great convulsion on the road to Damascus,
but Vance, that knee-walking sycophant, had his somewhere in the Cincinnati
suburbs on his way to Washington, where he decided to take up the cause of
Donald Trump, a man he had once described—accurately—as unfit for office,
bag-of-hammers dumb, and an aspiring American Hitler, further insisting that at
least some of Trump’s followers belonged in prison after the riot at the
Capitol on January 6, 2021, a view of which he has lately repented. One could almost—almost—understand
those who saw something in Trump back in 2016, but Vance saw the light only
after the attempted coup d’état that crowned Trump’s four years of
incompetence, cruelty, stupidity, venality, corruption, cowardice, laziness,
pettiness, and dishonesty the first time around. One could imagine Vance
concluding, circa A.D. 33, “You know, I didn’t think much of that
Pontius Pilate guy at first, but he really showed me something with the way he
crucified that troublemaker from Galilee while pretending to wash his hands of
the matter—real shrewd politics, there.”
Vance would later insist that he had been misled about
Trump by “some of the media stories that turned out to be dishonest
fabrications of his record,” as though the actual, plain, undisputed facts of
Trump’s record in office were insufficient to speak for themselves, and as if
Vance had for those critical years had nothing but Salon and MSNBC to
inform him about the world. Vance sliced the baloney pretty thin, but it didn’t
matter: If there is one thing we have learned from his public life, it is that
J.D. Vance is very, very good at telling people who can give him what he wants
whatever they want to hear, whether that’s Peter Thiel or Chamber of
Commerce-type Republicans or, in turn, right-wing conspiracy-kook podcast
jabroneys and Donald Trump.
(Which raises an issue: When I was an editor at National
Review, Vance was very much part of our little world. We had friends—and
interests—in common, and I made excuses for him for a lot longer than I should
have. I should have known better. Hell, I did know better, and I had
self-interested reasons for wanting to see Vance succeed and for wanting to
believe that he was a better kind of man than he is. Mea most maxima culpa,
etc.)
Hillbilly Elegy is a pretty good book, but it is
not an entirely honest one. It sometimes pretends to be a book about white
poverty in rural Appalachia, but Vance has only secondhand connections to that:
He grew up in the outskirts of greater Cincinnati in a household with an income
that exceeded $100,000 a year at times—back in the 20th century,
when six figures meant something—though he visited eastern Kentucky from time
to time as a child. Vance’s troubles—and they were genuinely horrifying at
times—were more Midwestern and exurban in character than hillbilly stuff: the
junkie mother, the deadbeat father, the belligerent and ignorant grandmother
who raised him when his mother couldn’t and his father wouldn’t. Vance rose
through the great American meritocracy and landed in the Ivy League elite at
precisely the wrong moment for his aspirations—right as the class into which he
had clawed his way was losing its credibility and its prestige as the digitally
amplified waves of 21st-century populism rolled over the cultural
and political worlds, democratizing, vulgarizing, and disfiguring everything
they subsumed.
Once again, J.D. Vance needed to find a way out of his
social circumstances. And he did.
And now J.D. Vance has found Jesus the same way he found
Donald Trump: at the moment when doing so best served his immediate material
interests. St. Peter’s, Mar-a-Lago: One gilded and gaudy old pile full of
relics is the same as another to such a creature as the vice president of these
United States. J.D. Vance’s new Catholic sensibility is something like
Caravaggio painted on velvet: It alludes to the fine forms of fine things, but
it is phony, tacky, and cheap.
Naturally, in Communion: Finding My Way Back to Faith,
Vance tells the same half-baked story about his religious wanderings that he
has told about his political conversion: He was misled after putting his faith
in the wrong people. “To believe, as I once claimed, that the theory of
evolution disproved the Christian creation story, I had to accept a couple of
things on, well, faith. I had to accept that the theory of evolution was true.
And I had to believe that the Christian Bible was incompatible with evolution.
I did believe these things, but I believed them because of whom I trusted. I
trusted that the Christians in my orbit had instructed me well in the tenets of
Christianity. And I trusted the many biologists, paleontologists,
anthropologists, and geneticists I had read—almost all secular—in their views
on evolution.”
Once again, Vance was led astray. So the story goes.
Maybe Vance has read “many biologists, paleontologists,
anthropologists, and geneticists” on the subject of evolution—though I doubt
this—but you’ll understand at this point, if you know Vance’s supposed life
story, that there is a considerable asymmetry there. Presumably, those
biologists and geneticists and such were experts in their fields rather than …
barstool paleontologists? … whereas Vance’s desultory Christian formation came
via his opioid-abusing mother, his absentee “holy roller” (as Vance describes
him) father, and from watching television evangelists with his Mamaw. Vance
attempts to paint himself as a kind of curious seeker, but what he was, it is
plain from his own telling, was simply a social Christian, a conventional
conformist who attended some youth group meetings and things of that nature,
the way many young people in his milieu did. He tries to inject a sense of
urgency into the story, but there is no peep of a voice crying in the
wilderness here. Vance is a smug striver writing smugly about what a smug
striver he used to be, smug in the knowledge that he has come so far from that.
“God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are,
extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican.”
Vance’s opportunistic turn to right-wing Catholicism came
when a particular strain of right-wing Catholicism bubbled up as a revivified
political current in the swamp that is Vance’s natural political home,
“integralism” and “post-liberalism” and all that happy horsepucky. Vance saw a
parade and ran to get in front of it, muttering a few “Hail Marys” along the
way. Of course he had never done any religious reading heavier than The
Screwtape Letters and the Narnia books: There was no juice in that for the
future lawyer and finance bro. Judging by Communion, he still hasn’t
bothered to read or think seriously about these things. To describe his
religious thinking here as superficial would be to extend to Vance a
degree of intellectual generosity he has not earned.
Vance’s insincerity is comically transparent at times.
Some of you will remember the matter of Vance’s trying to capitalize on
malicious fictions about (black) immigrants in his native Ohio rampaging
through peaceful (white) neighborhoods eating up the cats and dogs. It never
happened, and Vance knows it never happened, and Vance
has at times halfway admitted that he knows it never happened but seized on the
story, anyway, because it was politically useful. Perhaps his religious
instructors somehow glossed over the part about “bearing false witness.”
As it turns out, a talent for bearing false witness—in
the service of a president who has made a point of routinely violating nine out
of the Ten Commandments—is really what Vance brings to the party. I do not
write this lightly, but it seems to me that I have never in my lifetime seen a
public man work so assiduously to prepare for himself a place in Hell. If Dante
were working today, he’d break his protractor trying to sketch out an
appropriate circle in the Inferno for Vance, the “George Babbitt of Elmer Gantrys™.”
I will admit feeling my faith a bit challenged at times
when reading this imbecilic dreck. E.g.:“[T]o divorce political judgments from
morality is to make yourself less human,” Vance writes. Somehow, he was not
immediately turned into a pillar of salt after putting the period at the end of
that sentence. Maybe God is dead, after all. Vance continues and laments when
“conservatives backbite a Christian pastor for talking about taking care of the
poor or treating immigrants with dignity.” J.D. Vance of the Trump
administration—the Look-out-them-foreign-darkies-is-eating-the-cats! guy—wrote
that: “treating immigrants with dignity.”
Maybe God has not received His review galley yet.
I feel embarrassed for Vance’s wife—a broadly secular
Hindu, this surely is not what she signed up for, and if being vice president
is “not worth a bucket of warm p–s” in the estimate of Vice President John
Nance Garner, what can be said about being the vice president’s wife—and,
especially, this vice president’s wife? I feel sorry for Vance’s
children, who are deployed as moral props throughout Communion, with
Vance fretting about his son’s character development even as he proudly serves
as the most self-abasing henchman of would-be caudillo and quondam
pornographer Donald Trump. I would write that I am embarrassed as a Catholic to
share a church with this schmuck, but, of course, God’s house is a refuge for
schmucks, and scoundrels, and worse. It is the sick who need a physician, and
all that. To put things in terms of that tension that Vance once imagined to
exist between Catholicism and biology: I am embarrassed to be a member of the
same species as this despicable little gargoyle.
J.D. Vance rejoices (often) in being one of the youngest
men elected to his office—and, at only 41 years of age, perhaps he believes
that he has plenty of time to repent, that, as Thomas Becket never actually
said, “one
can always come to a sensible little arrangement with God.” No man knoweth
the hour, Mr. Vice President.
If there is something supernatural at work here, I am not
at all sure that it is the work of the God worshiped by the church that counts
J.D. Vance among its members. I suspect that, if anything, it is the hand of
the Other Guy at work here. In trying to shanghai the angels and saints into
the service of whatever you want to call the grotesque and infernal political
project that J.D. Vance and Donald Trump are undertaking, the vice president is
playing with fire. And brimstone.
No comments:
Post a Comment