By William H. McRaven
Thursday, June 25, 2026
In September 1862, General George B. McClellan, the
general in chief of the Union Army, had just repelled the Confederate advance
under Robert E. Lee at the Battle of Antietam. But, as Lee’s battered army
retreated across the Potomac River, McClellan failed to pursue him—leaving
Lee’s army mostly intact. Abraham Lincoln relieved McClellan that November for
his failure to be aggressive on the battlefield. The president addressed this
firing with members of his Cabinet, and made his rationale known in letters and
telegrams to key leaders in Congress.
In 1951, after failing to follow direct orders from
President Harry Truman and publicly criticizing the administration’s China
policy, General Douglas MacArthur was relieved of his command and forced to
retire. On April 11, 1951, Truman issued a public statement explaining exactly
why he had fired MacArthur.
In June 2008, Secretary of Defense Bob Gates, with the
approval of President George W. Bush, fired both the secretary of the Air
Force, Michael Wynne, and the chief of staff of the Air Force, General Michael
Mosely, for their failure to properly oversee the Air Force’s nuclear mission.
On June 5, 2008, Gates held a press conference to explain his decision.
Every president and secretary of defense has the right
and, moreover, the responsibility to remove officers who are failing to meet
the high standards expected of senior leaders. But when crucial decisions
regarding the professionalism, effectiveness, or morale of the military are
made, the people and their duly elected representatives have a right to know
why these decisions were made.
In recent months, President Trump, upon advice from
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, has relieved or forced the retirement of
some of the finest officers that have ever served this nation. I have
personally worked with most of them in combat. I can tell you from experience
that Generals C. Q. Brown, Randy George, Jim Mingus, J. P. McGee, Dave Hodne,
Jim Slife, and Joe Berger and Admirals Lisa Franchetti and Jamie Sands were war
fighters through and through. And this week, in an egregious decision, the president
forced General Chris Donahue to step down from his position in command of U.S.
Army Europe. Donahue is without question one of the most brilliant officers I
know. He is strategically focused, tactically aggressive, personally
courageous, exceptionally thoughtful in his planning and execution, and
compassionate with his troops. He has the respect of every man and woman who
ever served with him—and you can put me at the top of that list.
What is particularly concerning about these firings is
the effect the dismissals will have on the officer ranks. Throughout my time as
a senior officer, I never hesitated to provide my best military advice to the
secretary or the president even when that advice ran contrary to their stated
position. Never once did I fear that by providing my advice I would be fired or
asked to retire early. Not only was it my obligation to be forthcoming, but it
was also the expectation of those leaders that I would be brutally candid.
Hopefully, that level of honest engagement kept the secretary and the president
from making poor military decisions. However, these recent firings raise a real
risk that senior officers will be overly cautious about providing their best
advice and, therefore, that the chance for military miscalculation will grow
dramatically.
If Secretary Hegseth is trying to “revive the warrior
ethos and restore trust in our military,” as he has said, then the unplanned
departure of these senior leaders will do just the opposite and may leave the
president and the secretary without the experienced voices they need to make
the best military decisions. Members of Congress should demand answers. The
American people should demand answers. The future of our national security
depends on it.
No comments:
Post a Comment