By Charles C. W. Cooke
Wednesday, June 24, 2026
Darializa Avila Chevalier, who is now the Democratic
Party’s candidate for New York’s 13th congressional district, has some rather
ambitious goals. She wishes to prevent all deportations of illegal immigrants,
irrespective of the severity of the crimes they have committed; she hopes to
abolish prisons entirely, including for convicted murderers; and — oh yes, this
one jumped out at me — she is “fighting for the eradication of Western
Civilization.” “Our intifada,” she said two years ago, while at Columbia (where
else?), “is an Internationalist one.”
I see. Question: Do I get a vote on that?
I ask because, all told, that seems somewhat extreme.
Western civilization is me. It’s my wife and children. It’s my town, my
state, my country. It’s the Constitution to which I have taken an oath.
“Intifada,” in Arabic, means “to shake off.” Were Western civilization to be
shaken off, all that I cherish would fall with it. I’m against that.
By and large, I am an ecumenical sort of chap. I have
strong political views, but they are grounded in a classically liberal outlook
and an understanding that pluralism is the fastest road to peace. “Intifada,”
however, is not on my bingo card. Which leads me to wonder how I am supposed to
react to this. In recent years, calls such as Chevalier’s have become common
within the DSA set, and yet I have noticed that they engender far less outrage
than other provocative views that seem comparatively innocuous. In the present
era, at least, there seems to exist an assumption not only that the progressive
movement will occasionally go completely crazy, but that when it does, it
should be treated as if it were filled with impetuous children. Thus we are
expected to ignore the fact that many current candidates for office embraced
abolishing the police or suggested that white people are a virus or waved around a Hamas headband while
insisting that 9/11 was America’s fault — and to ignore them on the grounds
that those words were uttered in the past, as if the mere passage of time
grants one immunity, provided that one is really left-wing.
Well, it doesn’t. Chevalier is seeking a federal position
in the federal legislature that makes the federal laws by which I am bound. And
she is crazy. For various reasons, a good number of our commentators
seem to have become inured to this, so let me say it once again in slightly
different words: Pretty much nobody who has lived in the United States during
its 250-year history would ever, under any circumstances, have said or thought
that they were “fighting for the eradication of Western Civilization.” I am not
talking here about Congress, which is a much smaller subset. I am talking about
the entire population of this country, from sea to shining sea, in every moment
since the convention at Philadelphia. Chevalier’s declarations are the product
of a diseased mind. They represent an unequivocal confirmation that the speaker
is incapable of participating in society and of engaging with her fellow citizens
on equal terms. So far as I can tell, she has never had a job outside of
left-wing activism, which is appropriate, because her worldview ought to make
her unemployable in every other arena. That her foray into the world of work
may be as one of 435 U.S. representatives defies belief.
The literal answer to my question — “Do I get a vote?” —
is that I do not. Thankfully, I do not live in New York’s 13th congressional
district. But I do get to decide whether to tolerate this trend as if it were a
curiosity or a foible or, instead, to use my voice to characterize it for what
it is. I choose the latter. There is nothing charming or interesting or
harmless about Darializa Avila Chevalier. She is not amusing. She is an enemy
of the American creed. Those who wish to keep the sickness that she represents
from spreading outside of New York ought to begin the process of repudiation
posthaste.
No comments:
Post a Comment