By Noah Rothman
Friday, June 26, 2026
It was Iran’s terrorist cat’s-paws in Hezbollah who were the first to test Trump’s commitment to
his supposedly war-ending memorandum of understanding with the Islamic
Republic.
The remnants of the Iranian regime had telegraphed
their understanding that the first clause of the document was designed to
constrain Israel’s defensive actions in southern Lebanon. Perhaps Tehran wanted
to see if Hezbollah’s aggression would convince Washington to abandon its
efforts to tighten the reins on Israel. It didn’t.
The whole point of provocations like these in an
environment in which neither war nor peace prevails is that they test and,
therefore, redefine the parameters in which the enemy can act freely. The next
test — and there’s always another test — will attempt to expand those
parameters further.
And that’s precisely what happened on Thursday.
“Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps attacked a
Singapore-flagged cargo ship Thursday in the Strait of Hormuz,” the Wall Street Journal reported, in what officials believe
was a “deliberate” drone strike on commercial shipping. “The incident took
place near the coast of Oman hours after the Iranian paramilitary’s navy warned
ships not to use routes through the waterway that the regime hadn’t
sanctioned.”
This represents a direct Iranian attack not just on
America’s erstwhile role as guarantor of free maritime navigation rights, but the MOU itself. That document compels Iran “upon
signing” to make “its best efforts” to ensure the “safe passage of commercial
vessels with no charge,” albeit “for 60 days only.” It’s certainly a betrayal
of the trust America placed in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps — a
U.S.-designated terrorist group, the representatives of which have been
dispatched to “hang out” with American CENTCOM officials in Doha, according
to the vice president.
Perhaps the American side of this equation will treat
their IRGC counterparts to a gentle scolding in between air hockey matches at
the SMP lounge.
Trump has reserved for himself the right to enforce the
MOU’s terms by force, but his threats are hollow. He issues them regularly but hasn’t acted on any in a way that
would convey resolve since Operation Epic Fury ended in early April.
When Iran’s provocations did prompt an American
kinetic response, it was calibrated and proportionate. The effect of those
actions was only to communicate the president’s reluctance to return to war —
an impression likely confirmed by Trump’s willingness to halt
those strikes mid-sortie at the request of Iran’s duplicitous
diplomats.
Throughout the two-month cease-fire, the president
demonstrated a willingness to endure humiliation after humiliation, all while
bombastically warning that his patience was about to come to an end. But
it never did. The Iranians are therefore unlikely to believe Trump is
serious until and unless the bombs start falling again.
Iran wants to make this MOU as painful as possible for
the president, maximizing every opportunity to cement the impression that they
won and he lost. Why anyone in the president’s circles believes that the
Iranians will be quiet enough to allow the GOP to salvage its political prospects in the midterms is
anyone’s guess. That is a delusion fueled by motivated reasoning. And it is a
delusion that could be dispelled if the appeasers in Trump’s orbit would
internalize one obvious truth: Iran wants Trump and America to lose.
Since April 8, Iran’s bayonets have encountered only
mush. As the axiom dictates, we can expect that the Islamic Republic will keep
pushing.
No comments:
Post a Comment