National
Review Online
Tuesday,
July 18, 2023
On
Wednesday, when Israel’s President Isaac Herzog speaks to Congress, at least
five progressive Democrats will be boycotting. Representative Ilhan Omar led
the way last week by tweeting that there was “no way in hell” she would attend. She was followed
by “Squad”-mates: Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, Cori
Bush, and Jamaal Bowman.
When
Democratic leadership decided to invite Herzog to speak last fall, it was
viewed as a noncontroversial way to commemorate
Israel’s 75th anniversary. In Israel’s parliamentary system, the prime
minister steers policy, while the president serves as the ceremonial head of
state, with no policy portfolio. To the extent that Herzog has weighed in on
policy matters in recent months, it has been to urge Netanyahu to seek
compromise and back off his reforms of the nation’s judiciary. In short, there
is no reason for members to boycott Herzog unless their objections are to
Israel in general, rather than over a specific policy or figure.
The
left-wing Netroots Nation conference, which ran from last Thursday to Saturday,
became a forum for Israel-bashing. Omar declared, “We definitely need people who know what it’s
like to experience occupation, whether it is in Ukraine or Palestinian people
who have now experienced occupation and displacement for 75 years.” Given that
Omar traced the Israeli “occupation” all the way back to its founding, rather
than to the territories captured during 1967’s Six Day War, it leaves little
doubt that she considers the mere existence of Israel to be illegitimate.
At the
same conference, the leader of the House progressives, Representative Pramila
Jayapal, sought to appease a group of anti-Israel hecklers, reassuring
them, “We have been
fighting to make it clear that Israel is a racist state.”
After
Democratic leadership sought to defuse the
backlash, Jayapal
released a half-hearted apology, trying to frame her comments as really meant
for Netanyahu. “At a conference, I attempted to defuse a tense situation during
a panel where fellow members of Congress were being protested,” she said. “I do
not believe the idea of Israel as a nation is racist. I do, however, believe
that Netanyahu’s extreme right-wing government has engaged in discriminatory
and outright racist policies and that there are extreme racists driving that
policy within the leadership of the current government.” In other words, the
“idea” of Israel isn’t racist in theory, but it is in practice.
Democrats
will continue to downplay these developments, as President Biden will do when
he meets with Herzog this week. (Biden dragged his feet for months in issuing
an invitation to Netanyahu, and only yesterday agreed to a meeting at an
uncertain date.) But it’s becoming more challenging to put the genie back in
the bottle. Gallup has for decades been asking the straightforward question:
“In the Middle East situation, are your sympathies more with the Israelis or
more with the Palestinians?” In 2013, Democrats said they sympathized more with
Israelis 55 percent to 19 percent. When the question was asked this year, 49
percent of Democrats said they sympathized with the Palestinians, compared with
just 38 percent who said Israelis. That’s a net decline of 47 points in support
for Israelis among Democrats in just ten years.
Though
Democratic leaders will sweep Jayapal’s comments under the rug and dismiss the
Squad as a small and insignificant group within the House, it’s hard to ignore
the broader anti-Israel trend within the party.
No comments:
Post a Comment