By Andrew Stuttaford
Tuesday, August 12, 2025
For a long time now, climate policymakers have been
warning about the heatwaves that would be coming Europe’s way, and sooner
rather than later.
As that was what they expected, it would have made sense
to make sure that electricity grids could cope with the additional summertime
demand (in Europe, a largely temperate continent that makes far less use of air
conditioning than the U.S., electricity demand has traditionally been higher in
winter than in summer), a process that would not involve scrapping power
stations reliant on the wrong sort of fuel.
However, scrapping reliable power stations is what the
Europeans did, increasingly turning to “renewables,” systems plagued by the
problems caused by intermittency (the sun does not always shine, the wind does
not always blow), before making sure that there would be sufficient
power when the predicted heat arrived. In other words, as central planners are
wont to do, they got things the wrong way round. Greening Europe’s grid is not
going to make a material difference to the climate any time soon, meaning that
ensuring that Europe could weather hotter temperatures should logically have
been a higher priority.
But it wasn’t.
Europe’s energy systems have come
under intense strain this summer as repeated heatwaves have driven up demand
for electricity and forced plants to pause production. June was the hottest on
record in western Europe, fueling a rise in the use of air conditioning and
prompting a sharp increase in electricity prices.
Most parts of the region
experienced at least two intense periods of heat in June and July, with some
suffering more.
Total electricity demand in the
EU during the two-week height of the June 23 to July 3 heatwave rose by 7.5 per
cent year-on-year, according to figures from industry body Eurelectric.
The FT reports Eurelectric’s secretary-general
saying that that grid operators were facing a “tough reality” and “need to be
prepared.”
The question, however, was not whether Europe’s grid
operators were preparing for climate change, but how they were preparing
for it. Rather than opting for adaptation — boosting, retaining, and toughening
reliable capacity — they sank billions into climate mitigation schemes which,
even on their own numbers, were not going to make any difference to the climate
any time soon.
It’s almost as if climate policymakers wanted Europeans
to suffer through a very hot summer in order to make a point about the climate
“crisis,” but no, that’s crazy talk. . . .
Meanwhile, on the topic of thinking things through,
there’s this:
[S]olar generation reached a
record high in June in Europe, up 22 per cent on the previous year, which Ember
said kept the “grid well supplied during daytime hours” in most locations. “The
surplus of solar energy during the day helped prevent blackouts.
However, the use of energy
storage is still insufficient, leading to reduced energy supply after sunset.
This translated into a sharp increase in electricity prices,” said Pawel
Czyzak, Europe programme director at Ember.
There’s less sunshine at night?
Amazing if true.
No comments:
Post a Comment