By Philip Klein
Thursday, August 21, 2025
There’s a trendy argument going around progressive
circles that the actions of the government of Israel are a danger to Jews
everywhere. The argument is deployed by those who obsessively attack Israel but
want to be able to claim to be the ones truly acting out of concern for the
survival of the Jewish people. But it’s a contemptible position that would
never be applied to any other minority group under assault.
In an unhinged rant
against Israel’s actions in Gaza that went viral over the summer, actor Mandy
Patinkin fumed, “They are endangering not only the State of Israel, which I
care deeply about and want to exist, but endangering the Jewish population all
over the world.”
New York Times columnist Tom Friedman had earlier
offered a column version of this, titled “The Israeli Government Is a Danger to
Jews Everywhere.” He warned that “the way Israel is fighting the war in Gaza
today is laying the groundwork for a fundamental recasting of how Israel and
Jews will be seen the world over.”
Incredibly, he wrote that “police cars and private security at synagogues
and Jewish institutions will increasingly become the norm.” To this, I can only
say that I wonder — without trying to pretend that I am a perfect Jew — when
the last time was that Friedman attended a synagogue. In reality, an active
police presence was already the norm at shuls and identifiably Jewish buildings
well before October 7, 2023.
Now, to be clear, I believe that Israel’s actions to
defeat Hamas, which massacred over 1,200 people, raped women, and took 251
hostages, are righteous. But let’s just tease out the argument made by Friedman
and Patinkin, and echoed by others, and assume that Israel’s actions in Gaza
are making a lot of people very angry. In any other case, the left would
strenuously oppose anybody who lashed out at all members of a group for actions
taken by some members of the group. Yet when it comes to Jews, this somehow no
longer applies.
As an example, in the wake of the September 11 attacks,
there was a huge emphasis on the idea that people should not take out their
anger on Arabs and Muslims. This wasn’t even a sentiment confined to Democrats.
With the rubble still smoldering at Ground Zero and search and rescue efforts
still underway, Rudy Giuliani warned against engaging in group blame against
Arab communities in New York City; George W. Bush talked about Islam as a
“religion of peace.”
Similarly, after October 7, progressives weren’t
screaming that Hamas’s actions put a target on the back of Muslims everywhere.
They were, instead, blaming Israel for creating the conditions that led to the
Hamas attacks, or trying to restrain Israel from responding. Had American Jews
started harassing Muslims leaving mosques in the wake of the attacks, the
left-wing outrage would have been against the Jews, not against Hamas.
Yet when it comes to Israel, and to violent criminals
venting their anger by carrying out attacks on Jews and Jewish institutions all
over the world, the left is directing its ire at Israel rather than on the
actual perpetrators.
The reality is that a lot of people in the world want to
do harm to Jews, and while the excuses may change, this has been the case for
thousands of years. Does the left really need a refresher on how secure world
Jewry was in the years prior to the founding of Israel in 1948? Are we to
believe that its first 75 years of existence did not inflame antisemitism
everywhere, and that this started to become a danger only after its response to
October 7?
Well, in the decade prior to the October 7 attacks and
the subsequent Israeli incursion into Gaza, more than 40,000 Jews fled France for Israel because they no longer felt safe
practicing Judaism in their native country. Between October 2023 and the end of
2024, 35,000 Jews from all over the world immigrated to Israel.
Normally, people flee from war zones. Think about what it says about the status
of Jews globally that so many would prefer to leave their home countries and
emigrate to a war zone. The Times of Israel quoted one Jewish woman considering leaving France who
said, “October 7 changed everything. I would never have imagined thinking of
leaving France for Israel. It may seem paradoxical given the situation in
Israel, but at least there we will not have to hide.”
When people happen to use their opposition to Israeli
actions as their current excuse to target Jews, the ire should be directed at
them, not at Israel.
The irony is that if the idea that Israel’s military
actions are endangering Jews everywhere takes hold, it will only provide more
motivation for Hamas and its supporters to target Jews and Jewish institutions
globally. Because the radicals will conclude that targeting Jews is another
lever they could use to drive a wedge between Israel and the Jewish diaspora.
No comments:
Post a Comment