By Noah Rothman
Thursday, May 08, 2025
Pete Buttigieg is a political entrepreneur, and a
successful one at that. Whatever your politics, a figure who emerges from the
obscurity typically reserved for the mayor of America’s 316th-largest city to
run for president, earning a cabinet post as a consolation prize, commands a
grudging admiration. Buttigieg owes his success to his skill as a communicator,
but only in part. The other skill that has served him well is his reptilian
ability to shed his political persona whenever it becomes inconvenient. He
metamorphoses to suit his environment — an evolutionary adaptation that has
helped him survive with the changing political conditions. And Buttigieg isn’t
done yet.
Buttigieg announced last month that he would not run for
the open U.S. Senate seat in Michigan, the former transportation secretary’s
adopted home state, leaving the door open for another presidential bid in 2028.
In the effort to lay the groundwork for that aspiration, Buttigieg has jumped
on the “abundance” bandwagon.
In a conversation with Jen Psaki, the MSNBC host who was his
colleague in the Biden administration, Buttigieg articulated the philosophy
espoused by liberals who only just recently discovered that the red tape with
which the Democratic Party hogtied the country has become a problem. “The fact
that it is so hard to build and do things in this country, and I lived this
when I was at the Department of Transportation, we got 20,000 infrastructure
projects done, but we could have done more if it were easier to complete the
things that we start in this country,” he confessed.
This is a little rich coming from a secretary of
transportation who throttled his own department’s ability to “do things” by
burdening contractors with compliance initiatives that seem designed to
thwart productivity.
Take, for example, Joe Biden’s failed broadband expansion
initiative. “Lawmakers and internet companies blame the slow rollout on
burdensome requirements for obtaining the funds, including climate change
mandates, preferences for hiring union workers, and the requirement that
eligible companies prioritize the employment of ‘justice-impacted’ people with
criminal records to install broadband equipment,” the Washington Times reported last year.
What about the last president’s plan to put an
electric-vehicle charging station in every pot? “Buttigieg said that President
Biden plans on building 500,000 chargers by the end of the decade, and —
implying this is some sort of accomplishment — ‘the very first handful of
chargers are now already being physically built,’” our own Rich Lowry wrote in the summer of last year. “It’s true
that eight is better than zero, and the administration is now only 499,992
chargers away from its goal rather than 500,000 away.”
And then, there was what NPR described as the Transportation Department’s plan to
“help communities that feel racially harmed by highway expansions.” The
Reconnecting Communities program was supposed to repair the damage done in the
20th century by technocratic urban planners, whose lack of racial consciousness
led them to bifurcate minority neighborhoods with highways or disaggregate them
through “slum clearance” programs.
The Biden administration expended all the funds allocated
to that program, with only a handful of successes to show for it. “Oregon
received the second highest share of funding at $494 million across the three
grant rounds,” Streets Blog contributor Joe Harrington revealed, “but Oregon’s story shows how some
states and cities prioritized expanding the same infrastructures whose impacts
Reconnecting Communities grants sought to mitigate.”
The nonprofit Transportation for America pronounced its
verdict on the Biden era early this year: “Overall, the status quo on
transportation that was in place when the Biden administration arrived is
largely unchanged,” they observed, “though it is far better funded.” It was
“largely unchanged” because the secretary, like the rest of the administration
in which he served, was beholden to a variety of shibboleths that made a virtue
of inefficiency. Buttigieg was required to endorse those superstitions at the
time, so that was what he did. Now, repudiating the Biden-era Democrats’
paradigmatic blinders is what the times call for, so Buttigieg pivots. The man
is the master of disguise.
This was how Buttigieg ran for president in advance of
the 2020 cycle, when he retailed himself as a new sort of Democrat — an
independently minded, libertarian-leaning Democrat. “We’ve allowed our
conservative friends to get a monopoly on the idea of freedom,” he said in 2019. It was a clever attempt to wrest liberty
from the hands of those who define it as freedom from governmental interference
and oppression, restyling freedom — à la FDR — as freedom from want:
You’re not free if you’re afraid
to start a small business because leaving your job would mean losing your
health care. You’re not free if there is a veil of mistrust between you as a
person of color and the officers who are sworn to keep you safe. You’re not
free if your reproductive choices are being dictated by male politicians in
Washington.
“We know that your neighbor can make you unfree,”
Buttigieg observed. But, beyond that, “your cable company can make you unfree,”
too. And yet, neither your cable company nor your neighbor can form a cartel to
abuse you, nor do they benefit from a legitimate monopoly on the use of force.
Those are the provinces of government.
Then, as now, Mayor Pete was attempting to corner the
market within the Democratic Party for reform-minded centrism. In 2020, that
was a lane his competitors left wide open, and exploiting it served his
political fortunes well. He is revisiting the successful tactic now after
having spent the past four years repudiating that philosophy when it seemed
like that was what Democratic voters wanted.
Perhaps deep down, Buttigieg was always an “abundance
Democrat.” We’ll never know for sure. His ambition and opportunism have
rendered him an inconstant character. All we can say with certainty is that
Buttigieg wants to be president, and he’ll say what it takes to get him into
the White House.
No comments:
Post a Comment