By Rich Lowry
Tuesday, September 22, 2026
The New York Times writer Nikole Hannah-Jones
thought she was making her educational choices to favor the interests of black
people, and she was — just the wrong ones.
In a long essay for the New York Times Magazine,
the radical African-American journalist writes about how her decision to send
her daughter to dreadful New York City public schools for ideological reasons
ended in tears.
Hannah-Jones, who achieved notoriety as the lead editor
of the paper’s 1619 Project, believed that putting her daughter in rotten
elementary and middle schools would strike a blow for racial equity.
In her view, it’s unfair that so many black kids are
trapped in underperforming New York City schools, and if she trapped her own
daughter in them, she and her husband — with their superior wherewithal — could
make the schools better for everyone.
What started as a project motivated by a savior complex
ended as essentially an episode of educational Munchausen syndrome by proxy.
Her bright young daughter fell far behind where she could
have been academically.
Most parents who are paying attention and who have the
means would immediately get a kid out of a school where there are fights during
the lunch period, where there is no homework, where the principal and teachers
are routinely absent, and where schoolwork isn’t graded — but Nikole
Hannah-Jones persisted.
By the time her daughter was old enough to realize what
was going on and force her mother to let her apply to better high schools, she
didn’t know algebra despite getting excellent grades in math at the subpar
schools.
Hannah-Jones should be furious at the adults who failed
her daughter so abysmally, but she’s, in effect, still on their side by
portraying school choice as a racist scam and complaining about a lack of
resources.
The New York City officials, administrators, principals,
and teachers who are blighting the futures of young people aren’t white
supremacists; by and large, they agree with Nikole Hannah-Jones politically,
and many of them are African-American.
You can either be with them, and their narrow
interest in protecting the school system from serious challenge, or with the
kids.
Hannah-Jones is in a version of the same conundrum as the
Black Lives Matter activists who believed it was “anti-racist” to agitate
against the police. Then, when they got their way and the police stepped back,
more black people were killed.
Here, it is supposedly “anti-racist” to keep everyone in
disorderly, incompetent public schools — and the victims are black children who
have no idea of how little they’ve learned until it’s too late.
This is a strange form of racial solidarity.
There is no doubt that schools have a tougher job when
they have a high population of disadvantaged students. But the problem is not
funding, as Hannah-Jones suggests. Studies from the centrist Brookings
Institution note both that high-poverty, non-white districts spend more per
pupil than lower-poverty districts and that higher spending doesn’t ensure
better results.
The Success Academy charter schools in New York City have
shown that disadvantaged kids can thrive when there’s an old-fashioned mix of
high expectations, strict discipline, and rigorous instruction — in other
words, what the traditional public schools, mired in a self-interested,
unaccountable bureaucracy, can’t deliver.
When she sent her daughter to failing schools, Nikole
Hannah-Jones imagined herself acting in the tradition of pioneering parents
during the civil rights movement who sent their children through the mobs to
integrate whites-only schools. Those parents desperately wanted a better
education for their kids, though, whereas Hannah-Jones fed her daughter into
terrible public schools in the forlorn hope that maybe she’d be okay. If not,
at least Hannah-Jones had steered her clear of competitive schools with lots of
white and Asian kids.
That, of course, was a perverse priority. The famous line
is that a neoconservative is a liberal mugged by reality. The New York City
public schools mugged Nikole Hannah-Jones, and yet she still doesn’t want to
press charges.
No comments:
Post a Comment