By Abe Greenwald
Friday, September 25, 2026
Sometimes, you start to wonder if the current rise in
anti-Semitism is a bubble that’s getting close to bursting. The events of this
past week or so have me thinking about it. There was the Center of Attention
media study revealing the world’s obsession with Israel, the canceling of Ed
Sheeran for ditching Macklemore, the protests and walkouts over Benjamin
Netanyahu’s presence at UNGA, the release of the anti-Israel propaganda film NAZA,
a million new iterations of the genocide lie, and more hate-fueled assaults on
Jews. Doesn’t such obvious overkill expose the whole campaign as preposterous?
Isn’t it just too exhausting for its supporters to keep up with?
That’s the hope, but I’m reluctant to indulge it all that
much.
We have to remember that to talk of anti-Semitism in
terms of bubbles is to use a metaphor, and I’ve become increasingly convinced
that thinking metaphorically about the topic may do more harm than good.
Anti-Semitism seems to resist metaphor altogether. It’s
not, for instance, a disease or virus that one catches by chance. To describe
it as such recasts the anti-Semite as a kind of victim.
The problem in trying to wrap your head around
anti-Semitism is that it’s as singular a phenomenon as the Jews are a people.
It’s so unlike any other form of bigotry that it constitutes a different
category.
Anti-Semitism is a theory of how the world functions.
But, also unlike any other prejudice, it is spread most
effectively by those who don’t necessarily believe its core theory or hate its
targeted group. You don’t need to hate the Jews to believe the lie that Israel
committed genocide in Gaza. In fact, to believe and transmit any slanderous lie
about Israel, you need only have been told it under certain circumstances: You
must sufficiently trust the source (such as the mainstream media); the claim of
the lie must be couched in a moral concern (such as humanitarianism) that has
no explicit connection to bigotry; and you must not know a whole lot about
Israel, the Jews, and their enemies. The anti-Semites behind the original lie
are obscured by multiple degrees of separation, allowing their claim to advance
far beyond the bounds of the bubble itself.
Of course, it can be reassuring and therefore tempting to
think of anti-Semitism as a bubble. But that’s only because we take the
metaphor so superficially. We don’t consider what actually makes a physical
bubble burst. Something like a soap bubble bursts, for example, because its
wall becomes too thin and surface tension tears it apart. It’s an inevitable
outcome of the bubble’s continued growth. Sadly, there’s no guarantee that
political, cultural, or economic trends must comport with a comparable dynamic.
In the case of anti-Semitism, it’s as if the opposite
applies. Left alone, it will grow and grow until someone takes action to stop
it. If anything, the anti-Semitism inside the bubble is contained by a membrane
of civil norms and social taboos, and once those wear thin and the bubble
bursts, Jew-hatred is unleashed in all directions. I fear that might already
have happened.
No comments:
Post a Comment