By John Podhoretz
Sunday, March 01, 2026
‘You never know what is enough unless you know what is
more than enough.” These immortal words from William Blake’s 1790 prose poem
“The Marriage of Heaven and Hell” offer a rueful perspective on the turn in
Donald Trump’s fortunes in 2026. It appears his administration did “what is
more than enough” in implementing its policies related to illegal aliens inside
the United States and, in so doing, turned an unalloyed political and policy
triumph into a possible defeat.
What was “enough” was stemming the tide at the border in
2025. Last year, the net number of illegal crossings into the United States was
zero. All in all, according to the Brookings Institution, “net migration to the
U.S. was negative in 2025, a sharp reversal from net inflows exceeding three
million in 2023 and two million in 2024.” This came about due to better
patrolling, increased apprehensions of those attempting to cross and their
subsequent return south of the border, and the general sense among those
outside of the United States that the effort to enter under this new
administration would be a fool’s errand.
That change demonstrates just how out of control the
border had become during the feckless Biden years, when the administration
adopted a triumphally petulant “whatever the Trump people did, we’re going to
do the opposite” attitude. It arguably got Trump elected to his second term as
a result. Trump promised to put an end to the Biden approach. And he fulfilled
that campaign promise.
Polls suggested the public was overwhelmingly supportive
of the results. And then Trump did “more than enough.”
Throughout 2025, even as the work at the border was
uncontroversial in the eyes of the public, the decision to use ICE and the
Border Patrol to go in active pursuit of illegals inside the United States
proved to be a controversial policy. Closing the border was essentially an act
of defense. But conducting raids across the United States to capture and deport
illegals—some of them criminal actors but others simply people gathered in one
place to seek temporary day jobs in parking lots—was more akin to a war of
choice. It did not come in response to an immediate existential threat—unless,
that is, you are single-mindedly focused on the idea that the presence of
illegals among us constitutes a fast-acting social poison that we must flush
out of our system without delay.
It’s true that Trump promised to conduct “mass
deportations” in his second term, but he never offered a clear definition of
what that meant or how it would be done. And while 6 in 10 Americans said they
were in favor of deportations in 2024, the visible effort to pursue them in
2025 seemed to make Americans queasy. Nate Silver’s poll average calculates
that overall public support for Trump on immigration turned negative in June
2025 and has stayed that way since. The news coverage of ICE’s actions in
cities, showing masked agents moving aggressively on what appeared to be
unthreatening people, surely played a significant role in the shift.
Then things took a particularly bad turn for Trump when
he made the decision to “surge” forces into Minneapolis in December. This was
not a direct reaction to any specific change on the streets there but a naked
effort to shine a national light on an important story dating back to 2018: the
channeling of public dollars into fraudulent and nonexistent relief
organizations run by members of the Somali community in the Twin Cities. The
details were so egregious that the state’s sitting governor, 2024 Democratic VP
candidate Tim Walz, found it necessary to announce he would not run for another
term.
The Walz humiliation could have been a Dayenu moment—that’s
the word Jews sing on Passover that means “it should have been enough.” The
Somali fraud scandal was a slow-acting agent that turned suddenly lethal at the
end of 2025 when it came to Walz’s career and offered the promise that all
kinds of blue-state coziness between leftist politicians and not-for-profit
groups might be exposed and more fraud uncovered. The Somali scandal didn’t
need ICE. It was going to ice liberals all on its own.
That was not good enough for Trump. No, in the Blakean
marriage of heaven and hell that is his administration, Trump evidently needed
to learn what was more than enough. He surged ICE. He added Border Patrol
agents. The city’s (and the country’s) highly organized network of leftist
activists was there and ready for it. They instantly redirected the national
spotlight away from Walz and Co. and toward the immigration-enforcement
officers. They sought to provoke confrontations and they succeeded. Two activist
citizens, both personally imprudent but politically more useful than they could
ever have known, were killed by ICE and Border Patrol agents during chaotic
scrums lasting fewer than 10 seconds. One was minimally defensible, the other
in no way defensible. The whole business of the Minneapolis surge became at
best tragically unnecessary—a war of choice gone wrong—and at worst either a
sign of an armed agency out of control or of a brilliantly manipulated PR
campaign that was turning Trump’s greatest strength into a liability.
American attitudes on immigration are incredibly confused
and incredibly confusing. We believe immigration is a benefit to the country.
At the same time, we do not support illegal immigration and say in large
numbers that it should be prevented and that illegal aliens should be deported.
There’s something irreconcilable there. And matters become even more knotted
due to the influence of a radical vanguard led by White House deputy Stephen
Miller that opposes all immigration, illegal and legal, and is actively
working to eliminate it. The vanguard is also seeking to end birthright
citizenship, which has been accepted as a constitutional right since the
passage of the 14th Amendment (and which was implicitly seen as such in the
nine decades that followed the inception of the United States in 1776).
Miller and others define what is “more than enough.”
Trump has largely been walking along the path they laid for him. He is showing
signs of stepping off because he sees that the American people do not like how
it feels to live in a country whose government acts in the way it has. Mere
self-preservation suggests it’s time for him to say enough.
No comments:
Post a Comment