By Rich Lowry
Saturday, March 14, 2026
The CNN report the other day that the administration
didn’t properly plan for a closure of the Strait of Hormuz has come in for
heavy criticism. My guess has been that both sides in the debate over the piece
have been talking past to each other — yes, the administration obviously knew
that the Iranians could close the strait, but it didn’t necessarily
think they would close the strait.
The CNN report was clearly dependent on Democratic
sourcing for what the administration has been saying in briefings. This Wall
Street Journal report
seems better sourced and rings true to me:
Before the U.S.
went to war, Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told
President Trump that an American attack could prompt Iran to close the Strait
of Hormuz.
Caine said in
several briefings that U.S. officials had long believed Iran would deploy mines,
drones and missiles to close the world’s most vital shipping lane, according to
people with knowledge of the discussions.
Trump acknowledged
the risk, these people said, but moved forward with the most consequential
foreign-policy decision of his two presidencies. He told his team that Tehran
would likely capitulate before closing the strait — and even if Iran tried, the
U.S. military could handle it.
The story notes later:
The president and
some advisers were surprised at the breadth and scope of Iran’s retaliation,
which included missiles and drones launched at regional countries from
Azerbaijan to Oman, according to people familiar with the matter.
And part of the problem here was the lack of a robust
planning process:
Typically, war
preparations include weeks or months of classified deliberations, written
planning documents, the airing of dissenting views from diplomats and
intelligence officials, and National Security Council meetings with cabinet
members to make the most informed decision.
Only a small group
was looped into the preparations for Iran — including Vice President JD Vance,
Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Hegseth. That narrowed the advice,
information and ideas available to the president, who had to balance the many
downsides of an attack. . . .
Left unanswered
were such questions as how to evacuate U.S. citizens in an escalating conflict
— or ensure the next Iranian leader was friendly with Washington, U.S.
officials said.
Some senior aides
and U.S. diplomats who manage Middle East affairs were told little to nothing
about plans for the war. They learned the bombing had started from social media
and news reports.
Now, the current situation doesn’t mean the apocalypse —
the price of oil is the highest it has been in four years, not in, say, 50
years — but we almost certainly have weeks to deal with this issue, not months.
No comments:
Post a Comment