By Steven Wills
Thursday, March 19, 2026
Sea mines in naval warfare are “both obscure and
controversial,” as Weapons That Wait, a 1991 treatise on mine warfare,
put it. So the waterborne weapons attract considerable public attention when
used. In the case of current U.S. military operations against the Islamist
regime in Iran, much of that focus has been critical of the U.S. ability to
open the Strait of Hormuz to commercial traffic after regime officials — whose
forces possess several thousand sea mines — announced “closure” of the strait.
The reported lack of U.S. mine warfare capability and
capacity — such as images
of minesweeping vessels from the Middle East (CENTCOM) returning to the
U.S. in the lead-up to the U.S.-Israeli operations in Iran — has been roundly
criticized in many outlets. Despite these assertions, decommissioning and
retiring the aging Avenger-class mine countermeasures ships (MCMs) in
favor of unmanned systems operated from littoral combat ships (LCS) and the air
was the right choice. This is not unique to the U.S., either; European and
other allied mine countermeasure fleets are facing similar obsolescence.
The Avenger-class mine countermeasures ships have
been in service since the late 1980s, and it was the lead ship, USS Avenger,
that played an early role, along with the older MSO-class sweepers, in
reopening closed Kuwaiti shipping lanes and naval gunfire support areas during
the 1991 Gulf War.
Fourteen Avenger-class ships were built by 1994
and have served in multiple theaters, including the Persian Gulf and Western
Pacific, over the last 40 years. The Avengers have served well, far
beyond the usual 20-year service lives of smaller ships; their retirement was
overdue.
Replacing the Avengers’ capabilities are the
littoral combat ship–based mine warfare packages. While there have been many
delays and challenges with the LCS and its capabilities, including its mine
warfare systems, the current unmanned and helicopter-based mine warfare systems
have been tested and approved by the secretary of the Navy, who authorized the
retirement of the Avenger ships in the CENTCOM region in June 2025.
The LCS-based unmanned surface vessel and its acoustic
and magnetic sweep systems, as well as the helo-mounted laser-mine detector (ALMDS) and its attendant mine disposal abilities (AMNS), allow our ships
and the sailors aboard to stay a safe distance from the minefield. Instead, the
touchy operations are handled by unmanned and airborne systems. The older
vessels, both American and European, required that the ships enter the minefield
to detect and dispose of the mines directly, often with human divers in
support.
The relocation of the LCS-based mine countermeasures
ships to locations outside the Persian Gulf, condemned by some sources, was
another correct decision, as it prevented the Iranian regime from targeting
those vessels as it did the Fifth Fleet Headquarters in Bahrain. Though an LCS
is much better armed (with a 57mm gun and short-range missile defense system)
than the Avengers with just two .50 caliber machine guns, it’s not an Arleigh
Burke destroyer with 96 vertical launch missile cells and CIWS. Missile and drone threats are real, and their scale
varies. While the Navy gained great experience shooting down those weapons in
the Red Sea, there is no need to expose less capable warships to that threat.
If there is criticism of the current strategy, it should
be directed toward the pending retirement of the MH-53E minesweeping
helicopter, which in the past has allowed the U.S. joint force to act much more
rapidly to clear mines than what is possible with conventional mine
countermeasure ships. Without these helos available to CENTCOM forces, the
discovery and disposal of sea mines is limited to the slower process of mine
hunting that the MH-60 helicopter-based system executes as opposed to the wide
area sweeping of mines the MH-53 can perform.
While this latest threat from Iran is legitimate, the
U.S. Navy has decades of experience with Iranian mine and cruise missile
attacks in and around the Strait of Hormuz, going back to the Tanker
War and Operation
Praying Mantis in the late 1980s. Yes, Iranian mining and missile
capabilities have much increased since that time, but consider also the
reduction of Iranian ability to lay mines and launch missiles, as seen in
Operation Epic Fury.
The truth of the matter is this: The Strait of Hormuz
could be as much a trap for warships as was the Dardanelles Strait for British
and French battleships in 1915. However, the U.S. Navy and its CENTCOM joint
command are taking prudent, logical steps with systems superior to those of the
last century to suppress threats to shipping prior to merchant vessel escort
operations.
The U.S. Navy has not forgotten how to neutralize mines.
The U.S. Navy has not forgotten the USS Cole. Mines may be “weapons that
wait,” but the U.S. Navy has been waiting to return the favor.
No comments:
Post a Comment