By Nate Hochman
Tuesday, March 08, 2022
A Huffington Post headline from last
night crows: “Jen Psaki Schools Fox News’ Peter Doocy With Facts: ‘I Know
That Can Be Inconvenient.’“ Doocy, the Post reported,
had “trie[d] to blame rising gas prices on the Biden administration rather than
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.” But thankfully,
“no-nonsense White House press secretary Jen Psaki” schooled him,
using “‘facts’ to shoot down” the reporter’s “hectoring questions.” As
the Huffington Post tells it, Doocy was simply no match for
Psaki’s awesome power.
In response to Doocy’s dismissing “the widely held
position that Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine has
triggered the recent leap in costs,” as the Huffington Post put
it, Psaki maintained that “there’s no question that, as we have seen — and
outside analysts have conveyed this as well — the increase and the continued
increase . . . is a direct result of the invasion of Ukraine.” Doocy responded
by asking why the White House was “asking other countries to think about maybe
pumping more oil — why not just do it here?” To that, Psaki replied: “Well,
just to be very clear, federal policies are not limiting the supplies of oil
and gas.” When Doocy subsequently interjected by citing numerous examples in
which the Biden administration had, in fact, limited oil and gas, Psaki fired
back that she was going to “give you the facts here, and I know that can be
inconvenient, but I think they’re important in this moment.”
No facts followed. What did follow, however, was the
White House’s new line on skyrocketing gas prices: “The suggestion that we are
not allowing companies to drill is inaccurate,” Psaki said. “The suggestion
that that is what is hindering or preventing gas prices to come down is inaccurate.”
That was echoed by the president himself at a press conference today: “Let me be clear,” Biden said.
“It’s simply not true that my administration or policies are holding back
domestic energy production. That’s simply not true.”
There’s just one small problem: It is, in
fact, true. “Interior has been slow-rolling oil and gas permits since Mr. Biden
took office,” the Wall Street Journal editorial board wrote last week. Citing “mounting evidence of
anti-consumer behavior by oil-and-gas companies,” the White House told the Federal Trade Commission to “bring all of the
Commission’s tools to bear if you uncover any wrongdoing” in November 2021.
Biden’s flurry of executive orders during his first months in office
included killing the Keystone XL pipeline, which would have
transported up to 830,000 barrels of crude oil per day from Canada to the U.S.,
and halting new oil and natural-gas drilling on public
lands and waters. Last month, the administration indefinitely halted all new drilling permits
altogether.
The effect of all that has been exactly what you’d expect
— American energy costs have been steadily climbing. This was already evident
last December, as Deroy Murdock noted in the New York Post:
In October [2021], US oil drilling
had plunged 38 percent versus October 2019, before COVID-19 derailed the
booming Trump-GOP economy. With supply down and demand up (as COVID-related
instability has eased), regular unleaded gasoline retailed on Oct. 25 for $3.38
per gallon compared with $2.59 on Oct. 28, 2019 — up 30.5 percent. On those
dates, the New York Mercantile Exchange’s price for West Texas Intermediate
crude was $83.94 per barrel, versus $56.65 — up 48.2 percent. Likewise,
natural-gas drilling had slid 28.9 percent while prices were $5.90 per million
BTUs vs. $2.45 — up 140.8 percent.
Now, I’m on the record as being a green. I actually do think
climate change is a serious issue that we will have to contend with in my
lifetime, and I think American leadership on clean-energy innovation and
manufacturing is in the national interest. We used to lead the world on green
technology: From the 1950s through the 1980s, for example, the U.S.
controlled more than 90 percent of the solar market. But by the
mid-2000s, we were producing a mere 9
percent of solar panels worldwide, having outsourced production of any
number of clean-energy technologies to China. In the National Interest, Thomas
Hochman (full disclosure: my younger brother) argues that, as the global economy becomes more
organized around clean energy — and less dependent on fossil fuels — the United
States would benefit from positioning itself as a leader in both green
innovation and production. “Particularly when it comes to energy, economic
competition does not exist within a vacuum, and countries often leverage their
natural resources as a foreign policy tool,” Hochman writes. “Energy security
and independence are not abstract concerns; they have material consequences for
American security and prosperity in both the short and the long term.”
With that being said, there’s a right way
and a wrong way to do this. The wrong way would be to, say,
halt Keystone XL — which does literally nothing to reduce carbon emissions,
as I’ve written before — and then to gaslight the
American people by blaming the Kremlin. The wrong way would be to shut down
nuclear plants — the most viable source of clean energy available — in a fit of
self-destructive mania, as Germany is in the process of doing.
There are a number of viable right ways
to renew American leadership on clean energy and green technology.
Unfortunately, the Biden administration doesn’t seem interested in any of them.
Instead, it is catering to the eco-activist wing of the Democratic Party — and
pinning its policy failures on a war that kicked off many months after American
gas prices actually started to climb. That’s a shame.
No comments:
Post a Comment