By Philip Klein
Thursday, March 31, 2022
At a time of historically high debt, President Biden
spent the first year of his presidency pushing for $6 trillion worth of new
spending on a host of liberal priorities, of which (thanks to Senator Joe
Manchin) he was limited to about $2.5 trillion. Now, in proposing another
massive budget, Biden is trying to portray himself as some sort of legendary
fiscal hawk.
Do not believe him.
In unveiling the Biden budget this week, the
White House released a “fact sheet” that was filled with misleading claims.
Up front, the administration makes the claim that “the
deficit fell last year — by around $300 billion.” What this leaves out is that
it only fell relative to the historically high levels in 2020, when the Covid
pandemic hit, and that deficits are higher than they were projected to be when
Biden took office.
Specifically, in February 2021, weeks after he was sworn
in, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that deficits would be about $2.3
trillion during the fiscal year that ended on September 30. But under Biden,
the actual deficit for the year came in at nearly $2.8 trillion. Put another
way, even though the deficit declined relative to historically elevated 2020
levels, it actually ended up about $500 billion higher than what CBO was
expecting before any Biden spending policies went into effect. CBO has noted
that the 2021 deficit was “nearly triple the shortfall incurred in 2019.”
The Biden budget document also boasts that, “as our
historic economic and labor market recovery continues, the President’s Budget
projects that the deficit in 2022 will be more than $1.3 trillion lower than
last year’s—the largest ever one-year decline in our country’s history.”
Again, this is deceptive. Before any of Biden’s policies
went into effect, the CBO anticipated that deficits would decrease as the
country emerged from the pandemic. In the same February 2021 report, CBO projected
a $1 trillion deficit for 2022. But the Biden budget projects a deficit of $1.4
trillion — or 40 percent higher than the trajectory before he came it into
office — and then touts it as an incredible achievement.
The document also asserts, “The Budget improves our
country’s long-term fiscal outlook while also delivering on the ambitious
agenda the President laid out in his State of the Union address.”
This is another ludicrous claim.
When discussing the long-term fiscal outlook, what makes
the most sense is to talk about overall federal debt as a share of the economy.
The debt-to-GDP ratio has been on an upward trajectory for decades because of a
combination of fiscal mismanagement by both political parties combining with
the retirement of the Baby Boomers and health-care inflation. In 2019, just
before the pandemic, debt had risen to 79 percent of GDP. Due to the surge in
pandemic-related spending and the drop in revenue from a lockdown-battered
economy, debt surged past 100 percent for the first time since World War II.
While it is common for debt to rise during national emergencies, in the case of
World War II, debt levels receded at the conclusion of the war. But the Biden
budget does not anticipate that at all.
In fact, the Biden budget expects debt to grow from 102
percent of domestic product in 2022 to nearly 107 percent by the end of the
budget window in 2032. That would exceed the World War II record.
Though Biden does claim $1 trillion in deficit reduction
as a result of trillions in proposed tax increases, his budget relies on what
the Manhattan Institute’s Brian Riedl has flagged as a “magic asterisk.”
Specifically, at the bottom of Table S-1 on page 119, the
budget includes a footnote that reads:
The Budget includes a reserve for
legislation that reduces costs, expands productive capacity, and reforms the
tax system. While the President is committed to reducing the deficit with this
legislation, this allowance is shown as deficit neutral to be conservative for
purposes of the budget totals. Because discussions with Congress continue, the
Budget does not break down the reserve among specific policies or between
revenues and outlays.
Translated, what this means is that Biden is not
including the deficit effects of his trillions of dollars of proposed spending
through Build Back Better. And remember, the administration is also claiming
that “the Budget improves our country’s long-term fiscal outlook while also
delivering on the ambitious agenda the President laid out in his State of the
Union address.” In other words, he’s still pushing the same spendthrift
policies, but his budget counts them as having no effect on the budget. The
idea that these were excluded because they are subject to congressional action
is farcical given that the same logic would apply to all the other policies in
the budget.
The bottom line is that Biden’s reckless agenda has only
exacerbated our already terrible fiscal situation, and the only reason we
aren’t in even worse shape is that the centerpiece of his agenda has been
blocked.
No comments:
Post a Comment