By Kevin D. Williamson
Thursday, March 17, 2022
We should think about Vladimir Putin’s invasion of
Ukraine the way Boulay thought about the execution of the Duke of Enghien: “It
was worse than a crime — it was a blunder.”
(The witticism often is wrongly attributed to Talleyrand,
and occasionally to Henry Kissinger.)
Of course we should give due moral weight to the death
and horror associated with this campaign of mass murder. But I would hope that
somewhere in Washington there is someone coldhearted and clearheaded enough to
recognize this for what it is: an opportunity.
Putin has just put on a dramatic demonstration of the
Russian military’s incompetence and his own defective judgment. He is losing
thousands of troops and senior officers, along with a great deal of matériel.
The Russian economy is a shambles — one that is going to get much, much worse
in the immediate future. The free world has responded with energy and urgency.
Xi Jinping is trying to walk sideaways away from this mess. India, which has long
maintained a warm relationship with Russia, is treating the war as a bargain-hunting opportunity.
Putin, meanwhile, has graduated to the stage of his
dictator’s career when he starts denouncing his allies at home as traitors.
There are men in Moscow with a great deal of property and power — presumably,
they would prefer to keep these rather than losing them in a purge. Vladimir
Putin is not the only man in Russia who likes money and power and doesn’t mind
using violence to get them or to hold on to them.
Russia is not as big a problem for the United States as
China is going to be, but it is a problem — and a problem close at hand for the
European allies we are going to need in our contest with Beijing.
How often does an enemy give you a gift — a blunder —
like this?
A year ago, working toward regime change in Russia would
have been an exercise in wishful thinking. Today, thanks to Putin’s blunder, it
is a live possibility. It will not bring the dead back to life or make the
mangled whole, but we have a real chance to drive Putin from power without U.S.
forces firing a shot. We have a rare moment of international consensus that
Washington never has enjoyed in American efforts to deal with — to take the
most relevant example — Iran.
I worry that the Biden administration — not just the
president himself but the administration as a whole — is too lazy and too
risk-averse to make the most of the opportunity that Putin has laid before
them. But Putin’s blunder is worth exploiting: Getting rid of him leaves our
allies better off and disadvantages our enemies, redounds to our long-term
benefit both economically and in terms of security, and sets a salubrious
example for other would-be great powers bent on adventures abroad. And, in the
greater scheme of things, it isn’t very expensive.
I am skeptical of too much ambition in government, too
much cleverness, too much half-smart Machiavellianism. But we didn’t have to
hatch some grand geopolitical scheme to trick Vladimir Putin into his current
position — he climbed out on the ledge all by himself.
All we have to do is push.
No comments:
Post a Comment