By Jenna Stocker
Thursday, March 24, 2022
Writing in last Thursday’s Washington Post,
Sally Jenkins poses several questions regarding the nature of
college athletics, the purpose of the NCAA, and the role of competition in
collegiate sports — all in the context of transgender swimmer Lia Thomas.
But what Jenkins is really doing is ignoring the essential element of sport:
competition — specifically, fair competition. Removing fair
competition from the debate and making it about “becomingness” obscures the
inherent biological advantage of transgender women, because admitting to unfair
competition means drawing the conclusion that transgender women are not women,
and revealing that the whole progressive argument for gender identity being
equal to immutable biological fact is a farce.
Thomas, up until the spring 2019, identified as a man and
swam on the University of Pennsylvania’s men’s swimming team and just recently
competed in the NCAA women’s swimming championships, where he placed in
the prestigious top eight in all three of his individual events, including a
first-place finish in the 500-yard freestyle. But Jenkins, and many like her, want to move the transgender-in-sports
debate from one about fairness and competition to one about bigotry and
inclusiveness. Jenkins uses abstruse concepts about personal growth, esoteric
philosophy, and recondite musings to separate competition from sport. Jenkins
asks, “What is the real aim and value of NCAA competition?” and insists the
goal of athletic competition is not . . . competition. “It’s
supposed to be about exploring who you are, whether on the pool deck or
starting block or basketball floor. . . .” After all, “everyone is trans”
because we are all “on the way to becoming someone profoundly different than we
were.” Jenkins adds:
If you subtract the aim of
becomingness from competition just because you’re afraid of a Lia Thomas and
make it strictly about the chance to win a prize, then you might as well go to
an amusement park and shoot a squirt gun at a clown face because it will have
about as much meaning.
As a former Division I college swimmer, I find this
absurd. Whether on a court, rink, or in my case, a pool, the ultimate goal is
to win. The drive to be the best in my sport and my events
— distance freestyle — is why I rode my bike through the snow for predawn
practices at the University of Minnesota. It is why I swam countless laps,
pushing myself through the silence of my own thoughts staring at a bottom of a
pool. It is why I spent my college years forgoing other activities, parties,
even internships in pursuit of my dreams.
Of course, personal growth is a benefit of participating
in sports. I learned the value of hard work, perseverance, determination,
fortitude, and how to be a humble winner and graceful loser. But primarily,
athletes want to compete, and compete to win or lose fairly. Jenkins asks, “Is
Thomas’s presence preventing other swimmers from finding out who they are?” No.
But Thomas’s presence is preventing other swimmers from
competing in a fair environment — one in which these young women trained and
sacrificed their whole lives to reach, and the starting point of athletic
competition.
The NCAA is supposed to set the parameters of fairness
and act judiciously in implementing the rules it sets forth. According to its
website, the NCAA’s mission is “focused on cultivating an environment that
emphasizes academics, fairness and well-being across college sports.” Without
fairness, competition, and therefore sports, is meaningless. David Timmerman of
St. Charles, Mo., is the father of a young girl who competes for her local
swimming team and hopes to one day swim in college. I asked Timmerman, himself
a former athlete, if he worries about fairness in women’s sports. “What concerns
me is that my daughter will be forced to compete for a spot on a college team
against biological men. The NCAA is allowing men to compete against women on
the basis of some measure of hormones and calls it ‘fair.’ Women are not just
hormone-suppressed men. They are separate, special, humans with inherent
qualities they are born with. I can see it with my own eyes and to ask me to
ignore that is simply wrong.”
Jenkins uses emotional and cultural arguments, as well as
outlier athletic examples, to obfuscate the fact that as a group, men have a biological advantage in athletic competition.
Insisting that Lia Thomas makes women’s swimming more interesting and is
therefore justification for allowing transgender inclusion is again to ignore
that NCAA athletics is foremost about students’ athletic achievements. It is
true that the human-interest stories we have been conditioned to expect, such
as the spectacle found in modern television coverage of the Olympics, are a
byproduct of competition. But to argue that this is the main purpose of college
athletics is overwrought.
Jenkins’ main point echoes that of many on the trans
activists’ side who advocate allowing biological males to compete against
females: Every human is born with certain advantages and disadvantages —
genetic variances that manifest in physical attributes such as height, arm
span, or natural endurance — and gender is just another normal attribute.
Therefore, to deny it is to act against the spirit of “inclusivity.” Jenkins
cites former world-record holder and five-time Olympic gold medalist swimmer
Missy Franklin who, at 6-foot-2, certainly had an advantage from her height.
But what she did not have was years of testosterone that would have given her
many more and even greater advantages in the pool, something glaringly apparent
when Lia Thomas swims. And if we allowed bigger, faster, stronger males to
compete against females, would we even have heard of Missy Franklin — or, for
that matter, Serena Williams, Megan Rapinoe, or Allyson Felix?
Those who are celebrating Lia Thomas as a woman are
attempting to throw a veil over the purpose of competitive sports and biology.
They understand that the advancement of the transgender movement means
displacing the rights and protections of women and hinges on the debate about
whether it is fair for Lia Thomas to compete against women.
Until the NCAA and USA Swimming, along with every other
governing body in sports, take a stand in defense of the sanctity of
competition, women’s rights are in jeopardy. A threat in one arena is a threat
to women in every arena. No amount of “becomingness” changes
that.
No comments:
Post a Comment