By Rich Lowry
Tuesday, March
08, 2022
There are forgivable intellectual and
policy errors, and then there’s the self-delusion that has driven the West into
its dependence on Vladimir Putin’s oil and gas.
Russia has long been a major supplier of
energy to Europe. The depletion of European natural-gas reserves has played a
role in Russia’s increased significance. Moscow has also benefited, though,
from a deliberate choice by Europe to attempt a great leap forward into a green-energy
future, especially in a Germany that turned its back on both nuclear and coal.
In taking this route, Europe made a
holiday-from-history decision to forget the incredible power of oil, gas, and
coal — the most reliable and efficient sources of energy the world has ever
known — and ignore the inevitable centrality of energy to geopolitics.
Greta Thunberg, the teenage climate
extremist who has been elevated into an oracle of all that is good and true,
demanded nothing less.
No matter what you’ve heard, the world
hasn’t embraced fossil fuels out of hatred of the planet, rather because they
are so incredibly useful. If they didn’t already exist — thanks to sunlight and
plants that lived millions of years ago — we would have to invent them and
wouldn’t be able to.
Oil is a miracle fuel. Alex Epstein of the
Center for Industrial Progress writes that it is “almost eerily engineered by
natural processes, not just for cheapness, not just for reliability, not just
for scalability, but also for another characteristic crucial to a functional
civilization: portability.” It powers cars, trucks, and jets, without which the
modern world as we know it wouldn’t exist.
Coal, too, Epstein notes, is affordable,
abundant, and easy to extract and transport. There is a reason that developing
nations invariably use it to power their economic advancement.
So, it’s not surprising that fossil fuels
are still the leading source of global electricity, with coal accounting for
36.7 percent and gas 23.5. The total fossil-fuel contribution, at 63.3 percent,
is down only slightly from two decades ago.
In terms of overall energy, fossil fuels
are an even larger proportion, 84.3 percent.
For its part, green energy — wind, solar,
and other renewables — accounts for around 10 percent of global electricity,
and even less of total energy.
Vladimir Putin knew this and understood
the power it gave him, even if European policy-makers couldn’t be bothered to
think a tiny bit strategically.
Did they not notice that coal was the
mainstay of Britain’s rise to global power in the 19th century?
Did they forget the role of oil in World
War I and World War II, let alone subsequent 20th-century history?
Petroleum wasn’t particularly useful
before World War I and, by the end of it, had become a pillar of national
power. It fueled the motorized vehicles and airplanes that transformed warfare.
British foreign minister Lord Curzon famously said at the war’s conclusion that
the Allies had “floated to victory upon a wave of oil.”
In World War II, the Japanese attacked the
United States in part for fear that the American de facto oil embargo would
starve its war machine, and one reason the Nazis were defeated was that they
ran out of fuel.
Of course, the strategic significance of
the Middle East owed almost entirely to its vast oil reserves. The phrase “war
for oil” is a cliché and usually a smear, but it is certainly true that no one
has ever fought a war for wind.
In light of all of this, Europe still
chose to subjugate itself to an anti-Western authoritarian and, even as Russian
opera stars are getting canceled, it hasn’t ceased purchases of Russian oil and
gas.
Some perspective is necessary. While
climate change may indeed prove a serious long-term challenge, it is not
reducing parts of European cities to rubble or a threat to use a tactical nuclear
weapon.
If this horrifying episode hasn’t scared
the West straight on energy, nothing will.
No comments:
Post a Comment