National Review
Online
Tuesday, March
22, 2022
At this year’s NCAA swimming
championships, organizers allowed a biological male, Lia Thomas, to
compete against female athletes on the basis of transgender status. And so,
what should have been a moment of sporting pride — a celebration of some of the
best female swimmers in the country — became a scandal.
Thomas, a fifth-year senior at the
University of Pennsylvania, went by his given name of Will and swam for the
men’s team until 2019 without issue. When competing against men, Thomas was a
top-tier swimmer, though far from a national champion. But since Thomas
underwent hormone-replacement therapy during the pandemic and was allowed to
join the women’s team in the 2021–2022 season, the swimmer has dominated the
female competition. At the NCAA swim championships last week, Thomas reached
the podium in every event the swimmer competed in, an honor bestowed on the top
eight finishers in the nation. Thomas finished first in the 500-yard freestyle
(beating two Olympic medalists), fifth in the 200-yard freestyle, and eighth in
the 100-yard freestyle.
The NCAA’s reasoning is that Thomas,
having taken testosterone suppressants, is now biologically equivalent to the
championship’s female athletes. It requires nothing short of magical thinking
to come to such a conclusion. Menopausal women do not cease to be women after
their estrogen levels drop. And neither do biological men cease to be
biological men after their testosterone levels have been chemically
manipulated. The sex-based advantages conferred on Thomas during puberty are as
irreversible as they are obvious. It is literally impossible to change sex.
Thomas’s defenders emphasize that no rules
have been broken. But the rule-makers have abdicated responsibility. In
January, the NCAA’s response to the Lia Thomas controversy was to punt and
defer to the rules set by each sport’s governing body, in this case, USA
swimming. But this change wouldn’t happen until 2023. USA swimming’s own policy
was similarly evasive. It decided to lengthen the required hormone-replacement-therapy
period (effectively tripling the twelve months that the NCAA has been
requiring) and defer to a panel of experts to review “evidence that the prior
physical development of the athlete as male, as mitigated by any medical
intervention, does not give the athlete a competitive advantage over the
athlete’s cisgender female competitors.”
Any panel using the nonsense term
“cisgender” cannot be taken seriously. The competitive advantages males have
over females are well
documented (if not self-evident) and need not
be rehearsed here.
Even if Thomas had finished last in every
race, the effect would still have been to deprive female athletes of their
hard-earned opportunities to compete. Reka Gyorgy, a Virginia Tech
swimmer, wrote in an
open letter to the NCAA that she was bumped out
of the competition because of the organization’s decision to allow “someone who
is not a biological female to compete.” One father told National Review how the same thing
happened to his daughter. And a mother, whose daughter had also been displaced
in an event with Thomas, spoke of how “heartbreaking” it was to watch her
daughter sacrifice so much only to be beaten by a male.
The trouble is that most people know that
the emperor is naked but are too intimidated to say so. Inside the McAuley
Aquatic Center, cheers and applause for Thomas were relatively muted compared
with that for the female athletes. Some crowd members even booed Thomas, and
one women’s-rights protester shouted, “He’s a man!” If the reaction to Thomas
seems unsporting, consider how the female athletes feel. Parents report that
their daughters have been instructed by their coaches to smile, stay silent,
and step aside. So much for Title IX, which was supposed to protect women from
this kind of discrimination.
Instead of allowing, indeed actively
encouraging, this fiasco, adults should have taken a hand from the beginning
and politely but firmly said “no” to a biological male competing in a women’s
sport.
Thomas’s college swim career is now over.
And for the female swimmers at this year’s NCAA championships, the damage is
done. Yet, whether or not the embarrassment continues at the Olympic
level, this scandal has far graver consequences than even the injustices
endured by individual female athletes. It is not only the female achievements
that are under attack but the very definition of female.
No comments:
Post a Comment