By Charles C. W. Cooke
Thursday, March 03, 2022
During the First World War, the British public took
to booing dachshunds in the street — or so I was told as a boy. I always
thought this was probably untrue, but I am now beginning to wonder. In the last
48 hours, I have read that “the International Cat Federation” — that pillar
of civilization — “has banned Russian cats from its international
competitions”; that the Paralympics “will deny access to athletes from Russia
and Belarus”; that the state of New Hampshire is removing “bottles of Russian vodka from New
Hampshire’s state-run liquor stores”; that EA Sports intends to “remove the Russian National Team and all
Russian club soccer teams from its FIFA video game franchise, and remove all
Russian and Belarusian hockey teams from the latest NHL video game franchise”;
and that Russian chess player Alexander Grischuk has been “kicked out of a forthcoming tournament” in
Norway, despite being a critic of the war that has caused his ejection. From
here, booing dogs seems the obvious next step.
I can certainly imagine a situation in which one
country’s behavior became so extraordinary — and the threat that it posed
became so total — that another country needed to take the sort of
zero-tolerance line that includes the superintendence of cat-fancying. In 1940,
Nazi Germany posed such a threat to Great Britain. But, clearly, Russia isn’t
at that point yet, because, if it were, we would have stopped buying its oil. We are not expected, I hope, to believe
that it is imperative that we expel Russian pixels from our video games, but a
mere matter of taste whether we cease to purchase Russian energy? Somehow, that
would seem a failure to get our priorities straight.
Our reluctance to distinguish between Vladimir Putin’s
evil on the one hand and Russians and Russian culture more broadly on the other
is especially jarring given how unwilling so many people have been to criticize
the Chinese Communist Party for its role in the Covid-19 pandemic. Last year,
it was deemed beyond the pale even to mention China in
connection with the pandemic — lest doing so lead to sudden outbreaks of
“anti-Asian hate.” Why, I must ask, is the same rule not being applied here? Is
there really no useful middle ground? Assuming sufficient due process, there
are excellent reasons to target well-connected Russian oligarchs, just as there
are solid justifications for our having imposed harsh sanctions on the broader
Russian economy. But vodka that is served in the United States? Norway wasn’t
willing to boycott an Olympic Games that was being held in a
country that is committing genocide, but it has the resolve to keep a dissident
chess player from competing on its shores? None of this makes much sense.
I was going to ask rhetorically whether we intend to
abandon Tchaikovsky and Dostoyevsky, too, but, as it turns out, this isn’t
really a joke, for over at Marginal Revolution, Tyler Cowen notes that “the editors of the ‘Studies in the History
of Philosophy’ have decided not to pursue the project of publishing a thematic
issue devoted to Russian religious philosophy.” Why? Are there are a lot of
religious philosophers in the Russian military? Did they help plan the invasion
of Ukraine? Are the bulk of them fans of Putin’s — or even still alive?
This is boobishness in the extreme, the equivalent of disowning Beethoven
because of Bismarck’s bad behavior. The United States should use any leverage
it has against the Russian regime, but there is a difference between leverage
and iconoclasm, and it is one that too many in the West are not presently
observing.
We have rightly lionized the bravery of the Ukrainians
who are fighting with such defiance to keep their country intact. Those
Russians who are speaking out against the perversion of their country and their
rights by the tyrant who calls himself their president are deserving of the
same respect. They are not our enemy; indeed, they are as much the tyrant’s
victims as the Ukrainians. In the coming days, the fog of war will descend yet
further, and when it does, we would do well to ensure that we remain able to
tell friend from foe from everyone in between.
No comments:
Post a Comment