By Jeffrey Blehar
Thursday, July 31, 2025
Several months ago, I delivered what I still believe to
be an accurate assessment of Dallas-area Congresswoman Jasmine
Crockett, the well-educated scion of a middle-class family turned camera-hungry
vulgarian: She was a phony with a foreordained future, one I supported for very
cynical reasons. Crockett’s relentless quest for notoriety seemed inevitably
destined to come into conflict with the best interests of the Democrats as a
party. Crockett can rise no higher in Texas politics — Texans are more likely
to elect the ghost of Santa Anna as governor rather than a BLM activist turned progressive
gadfly — so her career in Congress is reduced to that of a publicity-seeker,
who can only succeed at the expense of greater party discipline and message
control.
So far, so good for Jasmine. Spotting a market opening,
she decided to make her national brand as a trash-talking gutter queen, the
“sassy progressive black woman” analogue to Marjorie Taylor Greene’s
“obstreperous MAGA populist lady.” (I use scare quotes around these
characterizations because I very much believe both of them to be acts.) She has
been successful at this. It is in fact fitting that she made her first big
public splash by engaging in a classless congressional catfight with Greene,
denouncing her “bleach-blonde bad-built butch body” in response to Greene’s
equally trashy dig about Crockett’s false eyelashes.
Merely recounting the incident fills me with despair;
John Fetterman disgustedly characterized it as akin to a taping of The Jerry
Springer Show, providing the rare opportunity for a man who shows up for
Senate business in a hoodie and shorts to raise a fair point about
congressional decorum. Meanwhile, Crockett trademarked the phrase (she refers
to it as “B6”) and sells it on shirts. Crockett, forever on the hunt for the
next viral incident, topped herself a year later, in March 2025, when she gave
a speech to the Human Rights Campaign in which she insulted Texas Governor Greg
Abbott as “Governor Hot Wheels.” (Abbott is a paraplegic.)
It was then that I wrote the assessment mentioned above,
with a fitting title: “Jasmine Crockett Is Tacky and Classless, and I Encourage
This.” In response, I heard from some of the more predictable quarters of the
left, which said that Crockett’s sass and combativeness was in fact quite
appealing to them. (“She fights!”) I chuckled inwardly because, knowing who was
saying this to me, I thought, “Well, of course you would. You are the target
market. I am not.”
It seems that The Atlantic is aware of this
phenomenon as well, and it recently published a wonderfully revealing in-depth profile of Crockett. The piece, by Elaine Godfrey, deserves
to be read rather than summarized, because Crockett reveals a good deal about
herself with her own words.
But I will say this: Boy, does this lady ever seem to
believe in herself. We learn that Crockett spends most of her day monitoring
her various social media accounts obsessively and dressing for “public
performance” (including sporting fingernails painted “R E S I S T”). In a
detail that speaks inadvertent volumes, we discover that, while the “lock
screen” on your smartphone might be a picture of your partner or your kid, the
one on Crockett’s is a glamour shot of herself.
Crockett ran for the top Democratic spot on the House
Oversight Committee earlier this June, and she huffily argued to the Atlantic
profiler that seniority was irrelevant; Crockett was far better suited for the
job than any veteran legislator because she was a bold young
communicator: “It’s like, there’s one clear person in the race that has the
largest social media following.”
Amusingly enough, Crockett’s colleagues were persuaded by
her fundamental argument — they elected two-term Representative Robert Garcia in a surprise
— but they clearly weren’t persuaded by Crockett herself. (And with good
reason: She is known as an intellectual lightweight more focused on crafting
alliterative zingers than legislating.)
And perhaps Crockett’s fellow Democrats wanted the
Oversight Committee to be represented by, well, a better communicator. At least
one who understands how the real media, as opposed to social media, work. After
Crockett learned that The Atlantic had spoken not only to her but
to some of her more skeptical colleagues, she attempted to revoke permission
for the author to publish her profile, as if such a thing were even
possible. In a move worthy of Michael Scott’s attempt to “declare
bankruptcy,” Crockett told Godfrey that she was “shutting down the profile
and revoking all permissions.”
Lady, it doesn’t work like that. Crockett’s tantrum says
something about how coddled and spoiled she has been during her rise — throwing
elbows and engaging in self-serving behavior without ever expecting to face
internal consequences. Her inability to completely control her own publicity
narrative — she clearly expected an overwhelmingly positive profile that would
boost her Q ratings — sent her into a juvenile panic. I return to what I said
months ago: Jasmine Crockett clearly believes that she’s a woman of destiny,
and I agree. Her destiny is to sow pointless division within her party, and I
could not be happier to see it.
No comments:
Post a Comment