National Review Online
Thursday, July 31, 2025
From the start of Israel’s war against Hamas, there have
been dire warnings of imminent famine in Gaza that have proven false.
In November 2023, just over a month after the October 7
massacres, United Nations World Food Programme director Cindy McCain told CBS
that Israel’s effort to destroy Hamas had already put Gaza “on the brink of famine.” By February 2024, no famine had
occurred, but the United Nations put out a statement claiming
that “at least” 576,000 Gazans, or about a quarter of the population of the
strip, were “one step away from famine.” A few months later, two U.N. agencies
warned that “over one million people — half the population of Gaza — are
expected to face death and starvation (IPC Phase 5) by mid-July [of 2024].”
Israel’s many enemies have a huge incentive to promote
the idea that Israel is using starvation as a tool of warfare. The New York
Times, along with most major media outlets throughout the world, turned a
photo of a skeletal toddler in Gaza, Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq, into a
rallying cry against the supposed Israeli policy of starvation. But the outlets
did not report that the boy was born with a muscular disorder, which helped
explain his sickly appearance, and they did not print part of a photo that showed
his healthy-looking brother beside him. Days after the deception was
exposed, the New York Times, which ran the photo on the front page, quietly updated the story, but only after the original
photo had been spread around the world.
All that said, it does appear the humanitarian situation
has now become more serious. Amit Segal, an Israeli journalist who has been
skeptical of prior claims of mass starvation, has pointed
to research showing the rising price of flour in Gaza and concluded that
this time, “Gaza may well be approaching a real hunger crisis.” Other credible
sources have concluded the same.
Even facing a hostile population, Israel has gone to
incredible lengths to try and help feed Gaza. In terms of sheer amount of
supplies, it’s an effort on par with the Berlin airlift. The current
operation, though, has faced barriers created by the United Nations and Hamas.
When the U.N. and its affiliated groups were in charge of food distribution,
its supplies routinely ended up in control of Hamas, which hoarded aid for its
own fighters and also sold it on the black market to raise money for its war
against Israel.
Israel, seeking a way to get aid directly to the people
without inadvertently helping to fund the terrorist group, helped put together
the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation along with the United States. In the face of
many challenges and threats from Hamas, the group has distributed about 100
million meals since launching in May. The new system for distributing food has created a cash crunch for Hamas, which is now struggling to
pay its fighters.
However, despite its efforts, GHF was never intended to
completely replace all food distribution programs, only to supplement them.
Unfortunately, because the U.N. refuses to cooperate with the GHF, it has at times allowed
hundreds of truckloads’ worth of aid to pile up inside Gaza without
distributing them. As David Makovsky, a scholar at the Washington Institute for
Near East Policy, has pointed out, according to its own data, when it has made
deliveries in recent months, an incredible 87 percent of U.N. trucks have been
“intercepted” — i.e., looted either by people seeking aid or armed gangs
seeking to steal the aid. The U.N. has cited this as a reason why aid has been
allowed to pile up undelivered at times, though it also has opposed the IDF
protecting the routes. There have been incidents in which the IDF has fired
warning shots to disperse mobs surrounding aid trucks, resulting in casualties.
This has been used by Israel’s critics to make the unfounded claim that Israel
is using the promise of aid as a trap to purposely kill off civilians.
Hamas, meanwhile, has long demonstrated that it is
willing to put its own population at risk knowing that the world will always
blame Israel for any suffering that occurs. It’s telling that as international
criticism of Israel spiked over starvation claims, Hamas dug in further in
cease-fire negotiations, rejecting a deal that would have freed the hostages
and put both sides on a path to ending the war. There is no reason for Hamas to
make concessions if it believes deteriorating conditions in Gaza will force
Israel’s hand without the terrorist group having to do anything. The U.K., in a
statement on Tuesday, threatened Israel with recognizing Palestinian statehood
at the U.N. in September if things don’t change. Why would Hamas negotiate if
it believes it can hold out a bit longer and advance the cause of Palestinian
statehood, which its leaders have spoken about as an intermediary step in their
efforts to eliminate Israel?
Also on Tuesday, the Arab League, for the first time, condemned the October 7 attacks and called on Hamas to give
up its arms and release all the hostages, albeit with the usual poison pill of
a Palestinian state and a “right of return” to Israel.
Trump, who is clearly growing frustrated and angry about
the conditions in Gaza, has been right to forcefully speak out against moves to
reward Hamas by recognizing a Palestinian state, and to point the finger where
it belongs. On Thursday morning, with his envoy Steve Witkoff in Israel for
talks about a cease-fire and the situation in Gaza, Trump posted on Truth
Social: “The fastest way to end the Humanitarian Crises in Gaza is for Hamas to
SURRENDER AND RELEASE THE HOSTAGES!!!” If the rest of the world were to echo
this statement, rather than attacking Israel, there’d be a better chance for a
deal to end the war and allow more aid to reach the people of Gaza.
No comments:
Post a Comment