By Michael Warren
Tuesday, July 15, 2025
Late last week, as I drove home from my office in
Washington to the Northern Virginia suburbs, I was shocked to see a protester
with a sign that read “Release the Epstein List.”
It’s certainly not unusual to see people around our
nation’s capital holding signs with all sorts of political messages. And where
I saw this sign—on a pedestrian bridge spanning the freeway—is a favorite spot
for protests, with its captive audience of evening commuters. Over the years,
I’ve seen dozens of different causes advocated from this particular bridge, but
they’ve been almost exclusively progressive or Democrat-coded. Signs touting
support for immigrants and abortion rights, Palestinian flags, and, most
recently, a banner declaring “No Kings” have all graced this bridge in
Arlington County.
But a demand that the federal government release the
likely nonexistent list that the late financier and convicted sexual predator
Jeffrey Epstein kept, for blackmail purposes, of high-profile, politically
connected clients for his sex-trafficking ring? This is the cause célèbre of
the fever swamps of MAGA world, not the educated, over-informed lefties of the
People’s Republic of Arlington (where Donald Trump won less
than 20 percent of the vote in 2024). And while there’s reason to think
this sign was an ironic troll of some of Trump’s most devoted supporters, there
are also some
indications that anti-Trump
voices are merely
reappropriating the theory to gain the upper political hand over Trump.
“The American people deserve to know the truth, the whole
truth, and nothing but the truth as it relates to this whole sordid Jeffrey
Epstein matter,” said
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, the House minority leader, on Monday. “What, if
anything, is the Trump administration and the Department of Justice hiding?”
Another House Democrat, Rep. Jamie Raskin, went even
further on a podcast this weekend. “Either Donald Trump is himself implicated”
in Epstein’s illegal actions, Raskin said,
or at least that Trump “clearly knew what was going on.”
We live in an era of political confusion, driven in no
small part by a debilitating addiction to conspiracy theories and an impulse
for partisans to grab whatever rationalization is close at hand to win the
debate of the moment. From explaining
away electoral
defeats as the result of cheating to being carried away with the most
outlandish rumors,
politicians are more than willing to play along with many voters’ willingness
to believe the worst of their opponents. But as the whole Epstein fiasco has
demonstrated, there comes a time when those who have been led to believe the
conspiracy is about to be exposed demand the goods—and the
results are often underwhelming.
That’s been the recent experience for the highest levels
of the Trump administration. For the last week, some of Trump’s most devoted
supporters have expressed
rage at the Department
of Justice’s memo regarding the investigations into Epstein’s 2019 death in
a federal prison. The memo affirmed the FBI’s conclusion that Epstein had, in
fact, committed suicide. It trumpeted a “systematic review” that “revealed no
incriminating ‘client list’” nor any evidence Epstein had attempted to
blackmail prominent people. It confirmed that the DOJ will not disclose any
more of its files or materials, much of which the memo claimed was sealed by a
court, or was just Epstein’s child pornography collection that should not be
released to the public.
The
MAGA fury comes from the fact that many of the same figures saying there
was nothing to the conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein—from Attorney
General Pam Bondi to FBI
Director Kash Patel—had just a few months prior been feeding those
theorists.
“He’s going to come in there and maybe give them the
Epstein list,” Patel said on
a podcast in November 2024, speaking of the just-elected Trump.
“It’s sitting on my desk right now to review,” Bondi
said of the supposed “client list” on Fox News back in February. “That’s
been a directive by President Trump.”
You can understand the whiplash felt by those who, like
believers in the QAnon conspiracy
before it, expected Trump to finally unveil what many had convinced themselves
existed: proof that many of the country’s most powerful people were secretly
pedophiles. But the DOJ memo did more than just pour cold water on this idea—it
reinforced the idea that the conspiracy
continues and perhaps Trump himself is
a conspirator.
So it’s no surprise that Trump is now trying to quash any
further conversation about Epstein and his administration’s investigation into
him. Last week, during a Cabinet meeting, the president snapped at a reporter
who asked a set of questions about Epstein. Then, on Truth Social Saturday,
Trump posted
a lengthy defense of Bondi against criticism from his biggest fans, as well
as a directive to those fans to move on.
“What’s going on with my ‘boys’ and, in some cases,
‘gals?’ They’re all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a
FANTASTIC JOB! We’re on one Team, MAGA, and I don’t like what’s happening,” he
posted in part. “One year ago our Country was DEAD, now it’s the ‘HOTTEST’
Country anywhere in the World. Let’s keep it that way, and not waste Time and
Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about.”
Trump’s command of his base of support is stronger than
just about any other American politician in recent history, but this Epstein
episode is a test of that command. At best, Trump has had to suffer a week or
so of annoying news coverage and some anger from his most devoted followers. At
worst, he’s lost a critical level of credibility from those selfsame followers.
Some in the MAGA media ecosystem seem to have
gotten the message about laying off the subject, while others are spiraling
off into wilder theories. Which way will Trump’s base go?
The week-plus-long headache this has caused the president
is unlikely to convince him to avoid stoking the flames of other conspiracy
theories—they’ve been his political bread and butter since
he was demanding to see Barack Obama’s birth certificate. But if there’s a
lesson here for other politicians, it may be that humoring your movement’s id
isn’t without costs. Liberals currently reveling in their own Epstein
theorizing should proceed with caution.
No comments:
Post a Comment