National Review Online
Friday, June 07, 2024
Contraception is widely available and widely used in
the United States, and there are, to a first approximation, zero people who
wish to use government policy to change that. Democrats and much of the media
are inventing a phony controversy about the matter to score political points
and accomplish other policy objectives. That is the meaning of the Democratic
push for a “Right to Contraception Act.”
The core right to contraception found by the Supreme
Court in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) and Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972)
is under no threat whatsoever. Pretending that it is has required Democrats to
misread and then magnify stray remarks. In his concurrence in Dobbs v.
Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022), the case that
overruled Roe v. Wade (1973), Justice Clarence Thomas said
that Griswold should be overruled. But that does not mean that
the Court will ever hear a case calling for an overruling; Thomas has only one
vote; and even he went on to suggest that a right to contraception might be
derived from the Constitution in a different way than Griswold did.
And even if — per impossibile — Griswold were
overturned, no state would try to ban contraception. That’s because the vast
majority of Americans have no moral objection to it, and even the minority that
does has no interest in prohibiting it. That extremely wide popular consensus
is why the Democrats think this issue is so advantageous to them.
Republicans are not voting against the Democrats’ bill
out of a desire to ban contraception. They are voting against it because it
overrides conscience rights, for example forcing doctors who do not wish to
perform sterilizations to do so; because it would require governments to fund
Planned Parenthood as a contraceptive provider even as it conducts more
abortions than any other organization in the country; and because it blocks any
state law to require parental involvement in the dispensing of contraception to
(or even the sterilization of) minors. Even Senator Susan Collins (R., Maine),
who voted to bring the bill to the floor, says it would have to be amended to
win her support.
The bill is a bait and switch. It attempts to use the
broad support for a right that isn’t threatened to cover the advance of liberal
policies that can’t win such support on their own. Republicans should reject it
and expose the deception that underlies it.
No comments:
Post a Comment