By Noah Rothman
Friday, June 28, 2024
The near-universal horror that Joe Biden’s debate
performance inspired among political observers has revolved primarily around
his obvious decrepitude evinced by his senior moments, exhausted voice, and
feeble body language. But, with apologies to my former Commentary colleague
Abe Greenwald for borrowing his
catchphrase, it’s worse than that. The optics of this spectacle were only
as bad as its more substantive movements. Even Biden’s rare flashes of cogency
were no less bewildering than his stammering forgetfulness or the stupefied
expression the president wore in periods of reprieve.
“The truth is, I’m the only president this century — this
decade — that doesn’t have any troops dying anywhere in the world like he did,”
the president insisted with all apparent sincerity. That is not “the truth.” It
is, at best, an egregious memory lapse, although that is in no way exculpatory.
Thirteen U.S. service personnel were killed in the attack
on Abbey Gate at the Kabul Airport due, in no small measure, to the slapdash
manner in which U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan was conceived and executed. In
January of this year, two Navy SEALs were lost off the coast of Somalia,
interdicting a shipment of Iranian-made weapons to the Houthi rebels in Yemen.
That, too, was a mission necessitated by the president’s bizarre tolerance for
Houthi attacks on commercial shipping and allied naval traffic in the region.
Later that month, three American troops were killed and scores more wounded in
a Shiite militia attack on a U.S. outpost in Jordan. It was the most successful
attack in an Iran-backed campaign of region-wide violence targeting U.S. forces
that did not produce a kinetic response from the president until American lives
were lost.
Joe Biden gave the orders that resulted in the deaths of
these troops — orders that are certainly justifiable but for which the
president is obliged to take responsibility. Indeed, in some instances, Biden
himself received the caskets of these fallen soldiers when they returned to
U.S. soil. Does the president remember that? We cannot be sure he does.
Biden’s faulty memory notwithstanding, the disrespect his
assertion showed the families of those troops, to say nothing of every other
service member, past and present, their families, and patriotic Americans writ
large, is inexcusable. The president and the White House are obligated to
apologetically correct the record.
That wasn’t Biden’s only gaffe. When CNN’s moderators
lobbed him a layup question on abortion — a subject so central to the
Democratic Party’s messaging that Biden should have been able to stuff it in
the hoop without breaking a sweat — the president somehow managed to indict his
own administration’s lethargy. The blizzard of half-coherent thoughts that
Biden let loose in his response to that question defies transcription,
but CNN made an admirable attempt:
Look, there’s so many young women
who have been — including a young woman who just was murdered and he — he went
to the funeral. The idea that she was murdered by a — by — by an immigrant
coming in, and they talk about that. But here’s the deal, there’s a lot of
young women who are being raped by their — by their in-laws, by their — by
their spouses, brothers and sisters, by — just — it’s just — it’s just
ridiculous. And they can do nothing about it.
In answering a question designed to highlight one of the
Democratic Party’s strongest issues with the prospective voting population, the
future of abortion rights in the post-Dobbs environment, Biden
pivoted without solicitation to one of the Democratic Party’s biggest
liabilities: illegal immigration.
Indeed, he appeared to make the case that America needs a
lax abortion regime because there are so many undocumented rapists about. That
menace is compounded by the fact that American women are routinely threatened
with sexual assault by their spouses, their spouses’ families, and their
siblings. They can even become forcibly impregnated by their “sisters,”
although we would need a gender-studies major to explain to us how.
Speaking of immigration, did you know that Biden had
somehow “changed the law,” assuming extraconstitutional legislative powers in
the process? That was the president’s claim, anyway. “I’ve changed it in a way
that now you’re in a situation where there are 40 percent fewer people coming
across the border illegally,” Biden insisted. “And I’m going to continue to
move until we get the total ban on the — the total initiative relative to what
we’re going to do with more Border Patrol and more asylum officers.”
That was Biden’s attempt to wield the compromise
legislation negotiated by Republican Senator James Lankford, which failed due
to Donald Trump’s opposition to the measure, as a cudgel against the GOP. When
it comes to Biden’s reckless border policies, deflecting the issue onto the
Republicans and alleging that they prefer the problem to its solution is the
only arrow in the Democratic Party’s quiver. And Biden blew it.
“I really don’t know what he said at the end of that
sentence,” Trump said one comically timed beat after Biden concluded his
thought. “I don’t think he knows what he said either.” Tough but fair.
A number of factors contributed to the outburst of
Democratic panic over Biden’s obvious infirmities at the conclusion of last
night’s debate, not the least of which was their pent-up frustration over
having to suppress their instincts for fear of offending the White House. The permission provided by the
spectacle we all witnessed partly explains the sudden outbreak of Democratic
candor. But that reaction is also likely attributable to the fact that
down-ballot Democrats cannot run successfully in competitive states and districts
if the top of the ticket cannot stick the landing on the issues.
From the easy stuff (abortion) to thornier matters
(Biden’s failed experiment in American retrenchment), the president appears at
sea. And when he opens his mouth, he makes life for down-ballot Democrats more
difficult. Given those circumstances, you’d be panicking, too.
No comments:
Post a Comment