Tuesday, March 11, 2025

End the Ukraine Intelligence Freeze

National Review Online

Tuesday, March 11, 2025

 

President Trump says that his administration is “just about” ready to lift the freeze on sharing intelligence with Ukraine. This reversal can’t come soon enough.

 

As part of his pressure campaign against Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump is materially weakening Ukraine in advance of the forthcoming negotiations that will determine the country’s fate and perhaps shape Trump’s second-term legacy.

 

The logic of the intelligence cutoff is straightforward, if misbegotten. Zelensky’s failure to play the part of a deferential and exceedingly grateful foreign partner of the U.S. during last month’s Oval Office presser prompted Trump to question whether the Ukrainian leader is ready to seek a negotiated settlement with Russia.

 

The White House considers the cutoff a temporary measure to force Zelensky into a conciliatory posture. That may have worked, as presidential envoy Steve Witkoff said Monday that Zelensky sent Trump a letter apologizing for the Oval Office meeting, which might be what prompted Trump’s remarks Sunday.

 

Even so, U.S. intelligence sharing should never have been used as a cudgel in the first place. The freeze has possibly already cost Ukrainian territory — and, according to officers in Kyiv, hundreds of lives. There are signs that Russian forces are chipping away at the remaining Ukrainian presence in Kursk. That Russian territory has been fiercely contested. After a surprise Ukrainian offensive seized it, Moscow deployed its North Korean reinforcements to the pocket. Ukrainian officers and U.K. defense intelligence now say that Russia’s counteroffensive has accelerated since the intelligence cutoff last month.

 

That’s far from surprising, since U.S. intelligence has backstopped Kyiv’s war effort from the very start. Without the intelligence that Washington shared during the first days of the invasion, Russian forces might well have taken Hostomel Airport, outside of Kyiv, putting the capital within reach. Instead, Ukraine’s military was able to reposition matériel to avoid Russian strikes and shoot down a troop transport aircraft. Since then, America has provided targeting intelligence that the Ukrainians have used to hit Russian positions, a practice that was paused this month.

 

While administration officials say that the intelligence cutoff exempts sharing information of a defensive nature, it’s far from clear what this means in concrete terms. Even intelligence of an apparently “offensive” nature, such as that enabling Ukraine’s offensive in Kursk, makes Kyiv’s defensive war effort possible. It makes little sense to distinguish these two categories — if Ukraine can’t destroy Russian assets used to buttress the invasion, it obviously makes defending its territory more difficult.

 

Moreover, Zelensky is now doing what the administration wants. In addition to the letter, Zelensky is taking part in conversations in Riyadh with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz. The gears of diplomacy are turning, and Zelensky appears willing to sign the minerals deal and prove that he will join the Trump-led peace process in good faith.

 

On the campaign trail, Trump stated unequivocally that Ukraine’s strength and survival are important to U.S. interests. Back in office, he has taken pride in his hawkish first-term stance vis-à-vis Russia’s ongoing assault on Ukraine. As he put it to Zelensky last month: “I gave you the Javelins to take out all those tanks. Obama gave you sheets.” During a recent interview, Trump also pointed to the sanctions he imposed on Russia and his efforts to kill the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

 

Those were worthy efforts, but the cutoff of intelligence sharing is a gift to Russia. It’s easing the way for crucial Russian gains ahead of talks and, if it were to endure, would fundamentally endanger Ukraine’s military position. Trump shouldn’t want to preside over a geostrategic collapse possibly even more catastrophic than his predecessor’s withdrawal from Afghanistan.

No comments: