Tuesday, March 11, 2025

Does Trump Know Why He Was Elected?

By Charles C. W. Cooke

Tuesday, March 11, 2025

 

President Trump is at risk of blowing his second term before it has hit the two-month mark.

 

Go on. Shout at me for saying that. I don’t care. Outside of a handful of terminally online zealots who do more harm than good to their side, nobody is invested in today’s presidential side quests. Early on in his tenure, Joe Biden forgot the lesson that had made him president: that neither social media nor the activists who dominate it are representative of real life. Astonishingly, Donald Trump is on the verge of making the same mistake. Within a year of his victory, Biden had lost sight of why he’d won, inoculated himself against feedback, become insular in his political outlook, and, worst of all, given in to the temptation to prioritize his pet projects over the elementary building blocks atop which all successful administrations are built. By advancing his chaotic, capricious, contradictory tariff agenda, Trump is making a similar mistake. Absent a genuine crisis, such as a world war or stagflation, it is invariably smart for presidents to begin with the quick wins, gain the trust and support of the public by yielding stability, and only then turn to the unpopular or tricky parts of their brief. Trump, like Biden, has reversed this order. It’s not working out any better for him.

 

When one observes this aloud, one is typically called names, tarred as a chronic pessimist, or even cast as an omnipotent wrecker. But the thing is: The electorate doesn’t — and never will — have any interest in any of that. As was the case with the Democrats, the MAGA movement’s preoccupations, presumptions, and put-downs are wholly irrelevant to the average American’s life. The public wants the economy humming, the border secure, an end to the illiberal lunacy that was wokeism — and that’s about it. It will not be distracted from those core aims by memes, inside jokes, or the obsequious insistence that the president is “based.” Canada becoming the 51st state, the purchase of Greenland, how people currently perceive Tesla, the “Gulf of America,” the real or imagined infractions of random legislators, the grudges and conspiracy theories of Truth Social users — these are all stupid, irrelevant indulgences.

 

So, too, is the desire now being expressed by some to “remake” America’s economy in the image of 1890 or 1970. Americans want the economy to be strong, and, beyond that, are not especially interested in the details. Telling those who are dissatisfied that the stock market has dropped as the result of tariffs they overwhelmingly oppose that, instead of complaining, they ought to be thankful for Trump’s brilliance is not going to help. Telling them that this development is an act of “love” will irritate them yet more. Telling them that the only people who care about such things are “globalists” or “billionaires” or “elites” is a recipe for disaster. The people who voted Donald Trump back into office wanted him to bring back 2019. They did not sign up for a trade war with Canada, the resurrection of William McKinley, or an endless game of red light/green light that tanks their 401(k) and makes it harder for their kids to buy a house.

 

Nor, indeed, are voters even one-quarter as invested in Trump and his success as his fans are. It may be important to Trump’s acolytes to defend him at all costs, but it is not important to the electorate — which, to its credit, is almost always unmoved by the bullying, lying, and indignant self-aggrandizement that works so well on Twitter/X. Americans don’t care what “influencers” have to say, they do not consider themselves to be represented by them, and they do not believe that they are a part of some world-historical revolutionary vanguard. They disliked the Democrats and wanted the basics fixed, so they chose Trump and the Republicans to run the federal government. That’s it. That’s literally all there is to this. The Republicans can either do the job well or do the job badly, but they will have to deal with the consequences of their choice. Doing the job badly and then trying to work the refs will be no more fruitful for them than it was for the Democrats. As ought to have become obvious by now, one cannot wheedle the public into accepting preposterous social theories, into liking ever-higher prices, or into enjoying destructive unpredictability. If Donald Trump doesn’t want to swiftly become the lamest duck who ever walked the halls of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, he’ll internalize that — and fast.

No comments: