By Matthew Continetti
Saturday, February 22, 2025
As Trump delivers on the economy and the border, foreign
policy threatens gains.
Ignore the Beltway Sturm und Drang: One month into his
second term, Donald Trump has advanced his coalition’s priorities of changing
Washington, tackling inflation, and sealing the border. Yet these gains could
vanish if Trump succumbs to the perennial second-term temptation of foreign
policy overreach.
For now, Trump’s position is secure because he’s
delivered. His job approval rating remains above water, 49 percent to 47
percent, according to the RealClearPolitics average of polls. Congress’s
approval rating has spiked as Republicans confirm Trump’s cabinet and pursue
his agenda. The GOP also maintains its edge in voter identification.
As I write, Trump has issued 108 executive actions. They are aligned with the
electorate’s aims as revealed in last year’s exit polling. What did the
electorate want? A point-by-point refutation of the Biden years. Which is what
we’re getting.
The political class can’t — or won’t — grasp the extent
of public dissatisfaction with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. Seventy percent of
voters in 2024 said the country was headed in the wrong direction, according to
the Fox News Voter Analysis. Eighty-three percent of voters
said they would like to see substantial change or complete and total
upheaval (my italics) in how the country is run. Fifty-two percent of
voters said Trump would bring positive change, whereas 48 percent of voters
said Harris would do so.
The CNN exit poll asked voters which candidate qualities
mattered most. The top two responses were the ability to lead and the capacity
to bring needed change. Trump trounced Harris on both qualities: 66 percent to
33 percent on leadership and a staggering 74 percent to 24 percent on
disruption. The message wasn’t subtle.
Elon Musk’s DOGE may be acting fast and breaking things,
as befits its Silicon Valley parentage, but its mission is consistent with the
public desire to stop Washington’s slide into stagnation and decline. And
Trump’s notable executive orders on affirmative action, DEI, gender ideology,
and paper straws fit into the MAGA coalition paradigm of uprooting politically
correct, net-zero nostrums that Biden and Harris embedded in government.
The most important issue facing the country in 2024,
according to the Fox News Voter Analysis, was the economy and jobs. Trump beat
Harris on the issue by 24 points. Two-thirds of voters said the economy was not
so good or poor, and they voted overwhelmingly for Trump. Seventy-five percent
of voters in the CNN exit poll said inflation caused their families severe or
moderate hardship in the past year. These voters also went for Trump. The fate
of the Trump majority depends on stable prices.
Last month’s inflation spike exposed the continuing
threat. The executive branch can help reduce inflation by lowering regulatory
burdens, increasing domestic energy, and cutting spending. Trump has signed
presidential directives to accomplish these tasks. Meanwhile, the legislative
branch can carry out a similar mission while also pursuing wage growth through
tax reform.
Which is why Trump’s support for one “big, beautiful”
House bill is significant. The president understands that his legacy rests on
improving living standards for working- and middle-class Americans. He
understands that his economic program hinges on a 218–215 House majority that
could crumble before the next Congress. He understands that the House proposal
isn’t mere legislation. It’s survival.
The 2024 electorate’s second-most important issue was
immigration. Here, too, Trump demolished Harris. Public opinion on immigration shifted because of Biden’s open border, giving Trump leeway
to build the wall, deport illegal immigrants, and fight narcos and human
traffickers. The most recent data show that illegal border crossings have
declined by 90 percent since Trump returned to the Oval Office. He’s
been so successful in deterring illegal immigration that the media rarely bring
up the subject.
For Trump to succeed, he needs to enact his domestic
agenda in 2025 and hold the GOP House in 2026. (The map makes a Democratic Senate takeover unlikely next year.)
The greatest danger to these objectives is a foreign policy that ends in trade
wars, military conflict, and wasted political capital.
So far, Trump’s tariff threats are more abstract than
real. Let’s hope they stay that way. A low-tax, low-reg, cheap-energy economy
can endure mild protectionism. But beggar-thy-neighbor tariffs and a scrambled
supply chain make no one wealthier. They just make government more powerful.
Voters chose Trump to improve the economy and close the
southern border. Acquiring Greenland — as much as this columnist loves the idea
— wasn’t on the menu. Nor was making Canada the 51st state, retaking the Panama
Canal, or owning the Riviera of the Middle East on the Gaza Strip. Just 22
percent of voters in a recent Quinnipiac poll support Trump’s plan for Gaza.
And while it’s true that Trump campaigned on ending the
Ukraine war, he risks losing popularity and support if an agreement with Russia
makes America look weak. Eighty-one percent of voters in the Quinnipiac poll
said the United States shouldn’t trust Vladimir Putin. The voters are right.
Second-term presidents often pay a price for foreign
policy hubris. Reagan had Iran-Contra. Bush’s surge in Iraq succeeded
militarily but cost him politically. Obama’s deal with Iran endangered America.
Trump, more powerful than ever, seems tempted to join their company. The
message from voters was simpler: raise wages, seal borders, drain the swamp.
Everything else is a distraction.
No comments:
Post a Comment