Monday, January 6, 2025

Time’s Up for Justin Trudeau

By Jim Geraghty

Monday, January 06, 2025

 

As of this writing, the Justin Trudeau era in Canada is approaching a rapid and bitterly disappointing conclusion:

 

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is increasingly likely to announce he intends to step down, though he has not made a final decision, a source familiar with Trudeau’s thinking said on Sunday.

 

The source spoke to Reuters after the Globe and Mail reported that Trudeau was expected to announce as early as Monday that he would quit as leader of Canada’s ruling Liberal Party after nine years in office.

 

Trudeau’s departure would leave the party without a permanent head at a time when polls show the Liberals will badly lose to the official opposition Conservatives in an election that must be held by late October.

 

There are 338 seats in Canada’s House of Commons; Trudeau’s Liberal Party currently has 153, or about 45 percent. (Minority governments, where a political party does not have an absolute majority of the chamber but runs the cabinet and government, are common in Canada.)

 

A late December poll found that if Canada held parliamentary elections, the “likely range of seats for the Conservatives begins at just over 200 and rises to over 240. There is very little chance that the Conservatives would fail to secure a majority government if an election were held today.” Members of Canada’s Liberal Party have publicly written to Trudeau, urging him to step down and “allow for a process to determine a new leader to replace you.”

 

You see, after a long stretch of high inflation, economic pessimism, rising crime, unpopular lax enforcement of immigration restrictionsinsufficient defense spending, and a foreign policy more focused on symbolic gestures than real and growing threats, Canada’s party of the Left wants their increasingly hapless and poorly communicating leader to step down before he steers his party into an election debacle. Clearly, Americans have no idea what that’s like!

 

Canada’s Conservative Party is currently led by Pierre Poilievre — the apple-eating member of Parliament who seems so preternaturally calm and collected he probably uses Quaaludes to wake up. In that widely shared video of him unflappably and repeatedly rejecting the premise of a hostile interviewer, Poilievre sounds like he has a resting heart rate of about six.

 

Pretty Boy overstayed his welcome. I’d say that at this moment, Trudeau’s face must be awfully red with embarrassment, but we all know that’s not the darkest his face has ever been. (Canadian culture forgives bad judgment, but only if you’re on a certain side of the political divide.)

 

You have to wonder if, in addition to the looming election wipeout, the prospect of spending the next ten months or so in office dealing with the return of Donald Trump is spurring Trudeau to contemplate his departure. It was just a month ago that Trudeau traveled to Mar-a-Lago in Florida, to meet with President-elect Trump, attempting to persuade Trump to drop his threat to impose a 25 percent tariff on goods from his country. The initial reports indicated the meeting went well, but afterward, Trump jokingly referred to Trudeau as “a governor” and Canada as “a state.”

 

Shortly thereafter, Trudeau responded by appearing at a feminist event and lamenting, “We were supposed to be on a steady, if difficult, march towards progress. And yet, just a few weeks ago, the United States voted for a second time to not elect its first woman president.”

 

As I observed then, “That statement reads like an endorsement of Harris, a month after she lost the election. Who does it help and what good does it do? Sure, maybe it makes Trudeau and the feminists in the audience feel better to sneer that Trump’s election was a setback for women’s rights. But do you think Trudeau’s comment makes Trump more conciliatory, or does it make the incoming U.S. president more determined to slap a 25 percent tariff on imports from Canada?”

 

Last month, Toronto-based Matthew Lau wrote at National Review that Trudeau “seems committed to his reckless economics and endless blunders” — a politically deadly combination of a massive expansion in government” with “a stagnant economy.”

 

The U.S. will not be annexing Canada; as Rich observed:

 

The United States doesn’t need another huge, misgoverned blue state. We already have California, where the climate and the surfing are better.

 

Over the last several years, Canada has managed to fall even further behind the United States economically. “The IMF forecasts that Canada’s national income per head, equivalent to around 80 percent of America’s in the decade before the pandemic, will be just 70 percent of its neighbor’s in 2025,” according to The Economist.

 

Writing on the same theme at the website The Hub, University of Calgary economics professor Trevor Tombe notes that “the gap between the Canadian and American economies has now reached its widest point in nearly a century.” The U.S., he continues, “is on track to produce nearly 50 percent more per person than Canada will.” Canada would be the fourth-poorest state per capita in the Union, beneath Alabama.

 

As our Dominic Pino observed, “The media were telling us ten years ago that Canada had figured out economics for the middle class. After nine consecutive years of left-wing government, every Canadian province has lower median earnings than every U.S. state. Maybe it’s time to give free markets and limited government a try.”

 

The widespread public dissatisfaction and projected voter backlash we see in Canada are not all that different from what we saw in the November elections in the United States, and the increasing discontent in once deep-blue places like California and New York City. In the end, the public judges a government on the results it generates.

 

Way back in 2019, I noticed that you didn’t have to look far or wide to find further-Left Canadians complaining that Trudeau had proven to be such a compromising squish — irking environmentalists, cooperating with Trump-era immigration policies, working on the ratification of the USMCA trade deal.

 

The median voter from Topeka to Toronto just wants safe streets, good schools, plenty of job opportunities and rising wages, low or at least manageable inflation, immigration policies that welcome newcomers but prioritize the country’s needs first, and a sense that their children will have it better than they did. The sort of things that enchant the hard-Left progressive activist class — DEI, climate change, amnesty for those who enter the country illegally, BDS against Israel, “congestion pricing,” “abolishing the police,” calling for cancer warning labels on alcoholic beverages — prove to be pretty toxic among most voters in the long run.

No comments: