By Noah Rothman
Thursday, January 16, 2025
When Joe Biden’s presidency is remembered, if it is
remembered at all, it will not be for its competence, invention, or creativity.
When it comes to wallowing in self-pity, however, the outgoing president is
setting new standards for his successors.
In the president’s offensively petulant farewell address — one of several
self-indulgent final bows he has allowed himself — Biden invented a new
nemesis, the existence of which explains why his party failed to meet the
public’s expectations.
“In his farewell address, President Eisenhower spoke of
the dangers of the military-industrial complex,” Biden said in a primetime
address to the nation from behind the Resolute Desk. “Six decades later, I’m
equally concerned about the potential rise of a tech-industrial complex that
could pose real dangers for our country as well.”
Americans, he slurred, “are being buried under an
avalanche of misinformation and disinformation,” he added. The “free press is
crumbling, editors are disappearing,” and “social media is giving up
fact-checking.” If Americans are not spared “the abuse of power” exhibited by
social media companies, the threat to the republic is total.
His intended audience ate it up. Biden’s warning “put a
shiver down my spine,” MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow confessed. “That is stark and sober,” she
observed. “I think he’s correct.” David
Axelrod agreed. Biden’s “warnings about the dangers the Tech-Industrial
Complex and emerging oligarchy were true and important,” Barack Obama’s former
campaign strategist exclaimed. “President Biden’s warning about the oligarchy
taking shape in America,” MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell mused, “might be the most remembered
lines spoken by President Biden.” We might take this moment to remember that
it’s the GOP that is supposed to be unusually susceptible to manipulation.
Observers of a foolish consistency could be forgiven for
concluding that the threat to democracy posed by social media companies is
directly proportional to the extent to which their proprietors support Republican politicians and their policy
preferences. After all, the threat to democracy posed by private wealth is
ever-shifting depending on how much of that wealth finds its way into Democratic coffers. Nor was the Democratic Party all that
vexed by “misinformation and disinformation” when they were the ones improperly
wielding the coercive power of the state to prevent Americans from accessing accurate information, albeit the sort that made Democrats
uncomfortable.
Biden’s attempt to appropriate the gravity of Dwight
Eisenhower’s farewell address borrows heavily from a left-wing revisionist history of his remarks. Even if we
accept the progressive’s premise, which maintains that Ike’s fear that a
monopsonist enterprise that accounted for 10 percent of U.S. GDP at the time
applies to the entire capitalist undertaking, that observation has little bearing
on the disparate entities that make up Silicon Valley. And yet, it’s easy to
see why Biden’s speechwriters convinced themselves that they could incept a new
bogeyman into the American political lexicon. The paucity of evidence
notwithstanding, Democrats adhere to an abiding belief that they can shape our perception of reality through rhetoric.
The menace that is the “tech-industrial complex” is
likely to compete for space within Democratic heads among so many other
existential right-wing threats. It will have to muscle its way past “Christian
nationalism,” which came into vogue not long ago. It adhered to the proposition
that “our rights, as Americans, as all human beings, don’t come from any
earthly authority,” Politico’s Heidi Przybyla disparagingly sneered. They “don’t come from
Congress, they don’t come from the Supreme Court, they come from God.”
This articulation of the Jeffersonian ideal codified in
the Declaration of Independence gave away the game, but progressive academicians and Democratic politicians were savvier in their indictment of
the GOP’s theocratic impulses and a totalitarianism that looms
forever just over the horizon. For decades, Democratic partisans have alleged that the American Right’s fundamentalism is adjacent to their susceptibility to fascism. The familiarity of that
allegation probably contributed to the national yawn that greeted Kamala Harris’s efforts to brand Donald Trump a “fascist.”
Indeed, when right-wing “fascism” is not descending across the land, a vague “authoritarianism” threatens to upend the American social
order. Democrats need merely invent the menace and universities will conduct
studies, pollsters will hit the field to identify the scale of the threat, and
mainstream media outlets will saturate the landscape with lurid portents of our
imminent dystopia.
A related but distinct specter that haunts Democratic
imaginations is the scale of the scourge represented by “white supremacy.” That
real but negligible American political phenomenon was elevated by Joe Biden to “the most dangerous terrorist threat to our
homeland” in 2023. Its close cousin — “Jim Crow 2.0” — described the
operationalization and systemization of racial animus that manifested in
policies designed to thwart black Americans from voting in places like Georgia.
But just as Israel’s “genocide” of Palestinians somehow yielded a growing Palestinian population, Georgia’s efforts to
suppress the vote gave way to a 204
percent increase in early voting in 2018. The preposterous assertion that
voting in America is harder today than it has ever been — certainly more difficult than purchasing a firearm — persists despite
the utter lack of support for the proposition. It’s as if Democrats believe
that if they say it enough, it will become real.
We could say the same for the flights of fancy that
overcame Democrats’ instinct toward prudence and self-preservation over the
course of the last two years. The peril represented by the GOP’s mesmeric power
to compel the impressionable to do violence in their names — the fabricated
plague of “stochastic terrorism” — became the subject of a breathless
news cycle until we learned that the incident that inspired it, the attack on
Nancy Pelosi’s husband, was the work of a deranged madman. But for a few heady weeks, we were treated to a national conversation about the tenuous link between acts of inchoate violence and the Republican Party’s sordid engagement in politics.
What is the allure of these clearly seductive but
ephemeral campaigns? Perhaps it is the Democratic assumption that the public
will forget that they are all the same if they are packaged in the polysyllabic
jargon native to the faculty lounge. In that sense, it’s an outgrowth of
Democratic hubris. But not in Biden’s case. For him, it is an expression of his
insecurity.
Biden set out to be the next Franklin Roosevelt,
convinced himself that he might have to settle for being the next Lyndon
Johnson, and ended up as the modern incarnation of Jimmy Carter. He has always
measured himself against his predecessors and come up wanting. Last night,
Biden sought to borrow the mystique around Eisenhower’s farewell address, only
to highlight his own deficit of ingenuity. The White House likely concluded,
not irrationally, that the press would take the baton and fill in the blanks
for him. And they probably will — at least for a while, until it becomes clear
that the public isn’t buying it.
No comments:
Post a Comment