By Rich
Lowry
Sunday, April
02, 2023
‘Community” is
one of those words that have been hijacked and ruined like “preferred,”
“appropriation,” and “equity,” among many others.
In the
wake of the Nashville shooting, of course, we’ve heard much about the
aftershocks that have affected the “trans community.”
“Fear
pervades trans community amid focus on Nashville shooter’s gender
identity,” reported NBC
News.
“Advocates
fear an escalation of hate toward trans community after Nashville
shooting,” warned NPR.
Karine
Jean-Pierre referred to the “trans community” being “under attack.”
There
are many problems with this reaction — perhaps most fundamentally, that there
is no such thing as the “trans community.”
There
has been a proliferation of ersatz communities in recent years, typically
marching under the collective banner of “marginalized communities.”
In an
entry on “communities of color,” the website of the Human Rights Campaign captured the prevailing usage
perfectly: “People of color who are also LGBTQ+ face a unique set of challenges
based on their experience at the intersection of two marginalized communities in
our society.”
This
ideological use of the word “community” has very little or no connection to the
actual phenomenon, which involves a discrete set of people, often living in
close proximity, who share common practices, values, and norms.
The
great German sociologist Ferdinand Tönnies defined community as “an
organic, natural kind of social group whose members are bound together by a
sense of belonging created out of everyday contacts covering the whole range of
human activities.”
Your
neighborhood is a community, your church is a community, and your pickleball
league is a community.
To take
a random example drawn from the life of Joe DiMaggio, there’s no doubt that
Isola delle Femmine off the coast of Sicily, where the DiMaggio family had
fished for generations, was a community and that North Beach in San Francisco,
where Giuseppe DiMaggio moved the family around the turn of the century, was an
Italian-immigrant community.
There
are genuine, longstanding gay communities in neighborhoods of American cities.
But
there is no overarching trans community any more than there’s a white,
African-American, left-handed, or red-headed community.
It’s
manifestly absurd to consider a disparate group of people constituting less
than one half of 1 percent of the population spread out across the entirety of
the country — from diverse walks of life and in different situations regarding
their trans status — as a community.
Regarding
their status, according to a
recent study by
the Washington Post and Kaiser Family Foundation, some of
these people may just wear the clothes of the other sex, some may have had
hormone treatments or surgical procedures; some may identify in public as trans
all the time, some occasionally, some never at all; some, in fact many, may not
even refer to themselves as trans.
It’s even
more preposterous to talk of an LGBTQ community. There are plenty of gay people
who think it’s wrong to try to convince what they consider gay girls or boys
that they are really members of the opposite sex. They themselves have never
had any doubt about their own sex, and they are supposedly part of the same
community — thanks, mostly, to a widely cited series of letters — as people
convinced they are the wrong sex?
The
emphasis on faux community is obviously a function of identity politics. It is
an attempt to play on our natural sense that communities deserve
representation, and a way to flatten all members of a large group and subsume
them into a single entity that progressives, and only progressives, can speak
for.
If we
believe what we are told, there’s no fashionable community in America that ever
has a conservative attitude or sentiment. Surely, if most trans people develop
doubts about aggressive gender-affirming treatments for minors, it will never
be said that the “trans community” opposes such procedures.
Of
course, if someone started referring to “the white community,” and expected
collective emotions attributed to it to be accepted at face value and its
political and social demands to be met, this would be considered ludicrous on
the one hand and noxious on the other.
America
in the 21st century needs more community, just not the kind that is on offer.
No comments:
Post a Comment