By Jim
Geraghty
Thursday,
April 27, 2023
Yesterday,
NBC News unveiled a new
poll with a
lot of questions focusing on social issues, and not all that surprisingly, it
found “stark partisan differences on major cultural issues — racism, accepting
LGBTQ people, the term ‘woke,’ and even the fundamental goals of American
society.” The good folks at NBC were kind enough to
have me on their panel discussing these topics.
One of
the things that stands out about this poll, and makes it really intriguing but
also disputable, is that it often gave respondents two options and asked which
is most important, and aimed to dissuade them from saying, “both” by not
listing that as an option. For example, the surveyors asked, “Which should be a
more important goal for our society these days — promoting greater respect for
traditional social and moral values, or encouraging greater tolerance of people
with different lifestyles and backgrounds?” “Both” was only recorded if that
was volunteered as an answer, 5 percent volunteered that answer, and another 3
percent said, “not sure.”
How do
you think 1,000 American adults would answer when asked that question? Take a
guess.
This
month, 50 percent of Americans said, “promoting greater respect for traditional
social and moral values” is more important, and 42 percent said, “encouraging
greater tolerance of people with different lifestyles and backgrounds” is more
important. Those numbers are barely changed from 2013, smack in the middle of
the Obama years.
Wait,
there’s more. When you break down the respondents by race, “traditional values”
was picked by 51 percent of whites, 48 percent of blacks, and 51 percent of
Hispanics. “Tolerance for different lifestyles” was selected by 40 percent of
whites, 47 percent of blacks, and 44 percent of Hispanics. Whatever racial
divisions America has, those three demographics see this choice roughly the
same way.
You
would think a poll result like this would encourage conservatives. But I
suspect this poll result will be largely ignored because it doesn’t fit the
narrative either for progressives who want to hear about culture-war triumphs,
or folks on the right who on some level actually enjoy hearing about how
decadent and depraved American society has become. Year by year, the loudest
voices on the right have adopted a dystopian “this country is going to hell in
a handbasket” vision; hearing that half the country wants to promote greater
respect for traditional social and moral values might actually stir hope,
confidence, optimism, and even unity, and lordy, we can’t have that, now can
we?
As you
would probably suspect, 74 percent of self-identified Republicans said
“promoting greater respect for traditional social and moral values” is more
important, while 67 percent of self-identified Democrats said “encouraging
greater tolerance of people with different lifestyles and backgrounds” is more
important. Independents split, with 49 percent picking traditional values and
41 percent siding with greater tolerance. (I wonder how many cultural
traditionalists stopped defining themselves as Republicans during the Trump
era.)
Now, as
our panel discussed yesterday, a lot of these terms are subjective. How do you
define “traditional social and moral values”? Which “different lifestyles and
backgrounds” do you have in mind? You could easily envision a churchgoing
Baptist African American who usually votes Democrat or a devout Catholic Latina
mom who want to prioritize both. Also note that back in 2020,
another NBC poll found
47 percent of those who described themselves as “LGBTQ” also described
themselves as “moderately or highly religious. Those who were older, Black or
lived in the South were the most likely to be religious.”
NBC’s
most recent survey asked, “Is America racist?” “Not sure” was only counted if
it was volunteered as an answer, but there was no “yes in some ways, no in
other ways” option. Among all adults, 59 percent agreed America is racist; 53
percent of whites agreed, 69 percent of Latinos agreed, and 79 percent of black
adults agreed. (I would note that the poll report
refers to this
demographic as “African-American,” but the
article on NBCNews.com refers to them as “Blacks.”)
The
survey asked respondents if they or a family member, friend, or coworker are
transgender; 28 percent said yes and 72 percent said no. (This is likely to
shock a lot of people in the Acela corridor.) Among those who know someone who
is transgender, 67 percent agree with the statement, “We have not gone far
enough in ending discrimination against transgender people.”
This is
a poll designed to push people off the fence into one camp or another, and to
see what they believe when the more neutral, consensus, or socially approved
answers are taken off the table. It’s not the same as a push poll; it’s more of
an examination of where people lean when the easy answers are removed.
It is
also worth noting that Americans likely have some contradictory beliefs.
Seventy percent of American adults agreed with the statement, “Our country
needs to do more to increase social justice.” At the same time, 64 percent
agreed with the statement, “Our country needs to reduce political correctness
and cancel culture.” Sixty-one percent of respondents agreed that they “want
our country to become more tolerant and accepting of the L-G-B-T-Q community.”
But in the same survey, 59 percent agreed that “we have gone too far promoting
L-G-B-T-Q lifestyles in our culture.” Maybe they’re just tired of rainbow
decorations in store windows every June.
One of
the things I noted is that, so far in 2023, the nascent Republican presidential
primary is being fought almost entirely on social or “culture war” issues.
Sure, candidates have all kinds of policy proposals, but it’s the culture-war
stuff that gets the crowds jazzed: What kind of gender-change procedures should
be legal for those under age 18, if any; whether schools should inform parents
about the pronouns their child prefers; whether those born men should compete
in women’s sports; whether the Disney Corporation is attempting to indoctrinate
the young fans of its pop-culture offerings; what’s being taught in schools and
so-called “book banning” (requiring books in school libraries to be
age-appropriate is not a ban); even the Dylan Mulvaney promotion by Bud
Light.
The
verdict of this cycle is painfully clear: Arguments about economics and foreign
policy do not get the blood pumping. In fact, the best way to get people
talking about economics or foreign policy is to wrap them up in aspects of the
culture war — “Woke Inc.,” ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance)
investing, contending that the U.S. military “has now gone woke at the top levels,
by trying to indoctrinate everyone down to the lowest ranking patriot,” as former president Trump put it.
At one
of Trump’s recent rallies, Ted Nugent declared Ukrainian president Volodymyr
Zelensky a “homosexual
weirdo.” Since the
beginning of the war, some opponents of U.S. aid to Ukraine such as Donald Trump
Jr. have
showcased a 2014 video of
Zelensky, once
Ukraine’s most popular comedian, dancing in a parody of
the Ukrainian band Kazaky, a male dance-pop act that often dances in leather and high heels.
(You can find the video Zelensky was parodying here.)
This is
akin to the U.S. electing Dana Carvey as president, and opponents contending
he’s a crossdresser because of Church Lady sketches, or electing Weird Al
Yankovic as president, and contending he’s a crossdresser because he dressed up as Lady Gaga for a parody
video.
It’s a
free country, and you can prioritize what you wish. But I would note that just
because people don’t want to pay attention to non-culture-war issues doesn’t
mean they go away.
During
China’s 20th Party Congress last October, President Xi
Jinping emphasized Beijing’s commitment to artificial-intelligence development
and “intelligent warfare” — a reference to AI-enabled military systems. (Hey, we’re coming
up on four years since something experimental from a Chinese government-run
laboratory got loose and killed millions of people.) China is building
sophisticated cyberweapons to “seize control” of enemy satellites, rendering
them useless for data signals or surveillance during wartime, according to
that Discord leak.
Pro-Russian
hackers are making an ongoing cyberattack to take down air-traffic-control
systems all across Europe. And the Pentagon admits that
U.S. hypersonic weapons are not as advanced as those already developed by China.
In that war
game on Capitol Hill conducted last week, the U.S. ran out of long-range missiles
quickly, and “Beijing’s missiles and rockets cascade[d] down on Taiwan and on
U.S. forces as far away as Japan and Guam. Initial casualties include[d]
hundreds, possibly thousands, of U.S. troops. Taiwan’s and China’s losses
[were] even higher.” The U.S. economy tanked, and most of America’s allies
chose to stay on the sidelines.
God
forbid some scenario like that comes to pass. But if one does, people will ask
if we spent too much time thinking about a culture war and not enough time
thinking about the potential risk of an actual war.
No comments:
Post a Comment