By
Jeffrey Blehar
Tuesday,
April 18, 2023
Breaking
news from the transom: Fox News has suddenly decided to settle with Dominion,
the company whose voting machines were at the center of mad post-November 2020
conspiracy theories aired and — rather unfortunately for purposes of both legal
liability and intellectual credibility — encouraged by Fox hosts when they
weren’t outright endorsing them. (Lou Dobbs? Won’t see him no more.) The case has been something of a
black hole in conservative media discussion — “Look away, for pity’s sake!” — a
disgraceful situation everyone is quietly mortified by. It was made even worse
by the humiliating revelations churned up during the discovery process, where
multiple FNC hosts were revealed to be cynical hypocrites knowingly
soft-selling preposterous and ultimately civically destructive lies to their
audience for no better reason than that they were afraid of losing said
audience to rivals. It is over now.
When CNN
settled with Nicholas Sandmann in his defamation case — remember the bemused
kid trying to keep his composure during the March for Life in Washington, D.C.,
while a professional activist chanted in his face? — the final payout was kept
secret but rumored to be in the $1-2 million range. That is a solid payout in a
defamation claim, more than mere “nuisance settlement” money. (The kid also
frankly deserved it.)
Now to
contrast, Dominion’s settlement agreement — which, it must be ruefully noted,
featured Sandmann’s former attorney in a key role — has netted them $787
million from Fox News. That’s roughly one-tenth of the entire cost of
Obamacare when the legislation was passed in 2010. It is more
than Fox’s entire net income for the year 2022, which lagged behind at $760 million. It is a
blow which Fox can survive financially, but which is devastating nonetheless
and reflects the commensurately devastating facts of a case which, if you have
not educated yourself about yet, you ought to.
There
will be more commentary on the Fox/Dominion case to come. For now, I will
repeat the question that I and others with legal backgrounds asked once
discovery had run its course and Fox News’ internal communications during the
election crisis became public: How could any lawyer look at this case and not
settle? How could any client willingly consent to such public humiliation rather
than write an enormous check?
Fox News
helpfully answered the question for us tonight: They suffered the public
humiliation and ended up writing a historically enormous check anyway. It
cannot help but feel like a poorly thought-out legal strategy.
No comments:
Post a Comment