By Liel Leibovitz
Wednesday, April 19, 2023
When a
28-year-old person identifying as transgender shot up a Tennessee school in
March, killing three children and three adults, the usual grim afterlife of
tragedy was underlined by an odd note: One by one, media outlets rushed to
apologize for “misgendering” the shooter, who, they explained, had been born
female but had recently begun identifying as male.
How to
make sense of such a statement? And what to do when a newspaper headline tells
you about a “trans woman left sobbing in JFK Airport after TSA agent hit her
testicles”? Appealing to reason hardly helps, as J.K. Rowling and others
learned the hard way when trying to ask simple questions such as how one might
define sex if not according to the chromosomes rooted in literally every cell
of our bodies. Instead, anyone wishing to find his way through the thicket of
American public discourse these days should start by embracing one simple and
terrifying idea: The barbarians are at the gates.
I mean
this almost literally. Everywhere you turn these days, pagans are afoot, busily
hacking away at the Christian and Jewish foundations of American life and
replacing them with a cosmology that would have been absolutely coherent to
followers of, say, Voltumna, the Etruscan earth god, or to those who worshipped
the Celt tribal protector Toutatis.
If you
think the above paragraph is a little bit overblown, consider the numbers. In
1990, scholars from Trinity College set out to learn just how many of their
fellow Americans practiced some form of pagan religion. The numbers were
unsurprisingly small: about 8,000, or enough to pack your average Journey
reunion concert. But the researchers asked again in 2008, and this time,
340,000 Americans said yes to paganism. A decade later, the Pew survey posed
the same question, and, if it is to believed, there are now about 1.5 million
Americans professing an array of pagan persuasions, from Wicca to the Viking lore,
making paganism one of the nation’s fastest-growing persuasions. So
fast-growing, in fact, that my colleague Maggie Phillips recently reported
in Tablet magazine about the thriving, and officially
recognized, pagan faith groups within the U.S. Army. “What’s important now,”
one of its leaders, Sergeant Drake Sholar, told Phillips, “is showing religious
respect and understanding across the board as Norse Pagans, or Heathens, return
to a distinguishable religious practice.”
Amen,
selah. But as we respect and understand those who profess paganism outright and
sincerely, we should worry about those—many more of them—who go by other names
and profess different affinities yet whose worldview is consistently,
coherently, and crushingly pagan. There are millions more heathens who would
shudder to be called such, yet who offer a vision of a perfectly pagan American
future. It behooves us, then, to reckon with the paganism in our midst.
And that,
it turns out, is not an easy task, mainly because “pagan” is somewhat of a
loaded term. If you have an appetite for good origin stories, you might as well
place the birth of the notion with St. Augustine in the fifth century C.E.
Pressed to explain to his readers why Rome had been sacked by the Visigoths so
shortly after embracing Christianity, Augustine wrote his famous
treatise, The City of God. Its full title? De civitate
Dei contra paganos, or The City of God Against the Pagans. The
latter, he opined elsewhere, had delivered unto mankind nothing but a “hissing
cauldron of lusts” that have so spoiled our souls and driven us so far from God
that the downfall was imminent. The moral stain of Augustine’s description
stuck, and it often colors both our historical vision and the observation that
“pagan” describes a dizzying array of peoples and beliefs—from the Slavic
tribes who believed that the sky god Perun had beget all other deities that
control nature to the Germanic peoples and their complex mythology of giants,
dwarves, elves, and dragons, familiar to us from Wagner’s operas.
Leaving
permutations and particularities to the pedants, though, it’s quite possible to
observe paganism as one sweeping vista and find common themes and threads that
haunt us still. Let us begin: Just what do pagans believe?
***
The
answer, while wonderfully complex, may be distilled to the following principle:
Nothing is true, everything is permitted. These were the last words, allegedly,
of Hasan i-Sabbah—the ninth-century Arab warlord whose group, the Hash’shashin,
gave us the English word “assassins.” And his dictum perfectly captures the
soul of paganism, illuminated by the idea that no fixed system of belief or set
of solid convictions ought to constrain us as we stumble our way through life.
To the
pagans, change is the only real constant. Just consider the heathens of old:
Believing, as they did, in the radical duality of body and spirit, they enjoyed
watching their gods breathe the latter into a wide array of incarnations. To
please himself or trick his followers, a god could become a swan or a stone,
manifest himself as a river or adopt whatever shape suited his schemes. Ovid,
the greatest of Pagan poets, captured this logic perfectly when he began
his Metamorphoses with a simple declaration of his
intentions: In nova fert animus mutates dicere formas corpora, or,
“I am about to speak of forms changing into new entities.” This was not
understood as fickle behavior by the gods’ cheerful followers. To the contrary.
With no dogma to uphold, the sole job of deities was simply to be themselves.
And the more solipsistic a deity chose to be, the better. Nothing, after all,
radiates inimitable individuality more than marching to the beat of your own
drum and no other.
If
that’s your understanding of the gods, or whatever you’d like to call the
hidden forces that arrange the known universe, how should you behave? Again,
lacking a prescribed credo passed down from generation to generation, pagans
began answering this question by casting off the tyranny of fixity. The gods
are precarious and ever-changing? Let us follow their example! We should
sanctify each sharp transformation in our behaviors and beliefs not as
collective madness but as a sign of the wisdom of growth.
Still,
change alone does not a belief system make, and pagans, despite differences
galore, unite by providing similar answers to three seminal questions: what to
do about strangers, how to think about nature, and how to please the gods.
First,
the question of difference. What to do with those who are not like us? Easy
enough, argued the pagans: Observe any group of humans, no matter how small,
and you’ll see it striving to differentiate itself from the group next door.
The nomadic Bedouins expressed this idea neatly in an idiom: me and my brothers
against our cousins, us and our cousins against our neighbors. Tell children at
summer camp that a color war’s afoot, and pretty soon Team Red is likely to
develop healthy disdain for Team Blue. Rather than seek to transcend this basic
instinct, the pagans sanctified it: It wasn’t for nothing that the Slavs, for
example, named their top god Perun, an Indo-European word meaning to strike and
splinter, and portrayed him as swinging a mighty axe and engaging in ongoing
battles with his fellow divines.
The same
spirit, alas, is alive and well among our newest pagans: For them, tribal
warfare isn’t just a way of life—it’s a system of divination, with power and
privilege waxing and waning to reveal who is pure and worthy and who evil and
benighted.
Consider,
for example, intersectionality, the academic doctrine that is as close as
contemporary paganism gets to a formalized gospel. Its ideas, like most of
academia’s excretions these days, aren’t worth studying in any real depth, but
the key concept is simple. We each have several components to our
identity—sometimes referred to, in the flowery language of assistant
professors, as “vectors of oppression and privilege”—and their interplay
determines the discrimination we suffer or the violence we may be tempted to
wield against others. This means that each introspection is nothing more than
an invitation to a fight with those who have more power, real or imagined, than
you.
This is
what gave Lori Lightfoot, Chicago’s grotesquely inept mayor, the temerity to
avoid blaming her recent defeat on, say, the fact that she had called on her
city to defund the police, then watched crime soar—with more than 800 murders
in 2021 alone, the highest rate in nearly 30 years—and then begged the federal
government to help her out of the predictable mess she created. No, she had
been defeated for being “a black woman.” For a pagan, tribal identity isn’t the
beginning of the conversation; it’s the end, an affiliation beyond which lies
nothing but battle for dominance.
Still, merely
affirming their own and rejecting others and spending their days trying to
decipher who belongs to which group is hardly the sort of theological engine
that can power faith for long. Next, then, the pagans turn their lonely eyes
toward nature, asking themselves how to understand the creations in their
midst. Here, too, a relatively straight forward answer presents itself
immediately: If the boundaries between the human world, the natural world, and
the divine world aren’t clearly defined—if Zeus, say, can transform himself
into a beautiful white bull so that he may rape Princess Europa—then nature
should be revered as the repository of divine revelation and rebirth. The Roman
historian Tacitus, for example, tells us that the ancient Germanic tribes often
worshipped in groves rather than temples. It’s easy to figure out why: Observe
the oak in winter, and it stands, barren and leafless, a pillar of death. Visit
it some weeks later, when spring is in full bloom, and you see it flourish
again. The oak, like the gods, is change embodied, and therefore deserving of
worship.
Scan the
modern pagan cosmology, and you’ll see much that would have made those ancient
Germanic cultists nod in recognition. Consider the eco-protestor who, last
year, stormed the court just before Roger Federer’s last career tennis match
and set his own arms on fire to protest climate change. Or the Brit who,
shortly thereafter, poured human feces on a statue to call attention to
environmental causes. Or the lunatics from Just Stop Oil, a radical
environmentalist group, who slung soup on Van Gogh’s Sunflowers.
Just like the Scandinavian pagans who offered precious gifts to appease the
Askafroa, the spirit of the Ash Tree, a vengeful entity that demanded sacrifice
lest it wreak havoc, many of today’s green activists seem much more intent on
appeasing an angry god than solving a scientific conundrum. And the scientists
themselves aren’t helping much either: In 2018, for example, one prominent
Columbia University climate scientist took to Scientific American to
write that she refuses to debate…climate science. “Once you put established
facts about the world up for argument, you’ve already lost,” she wrote,
capturing the opposite, more or less, of the scientific method, which is little
more than a constant and unfettered argument about established facts, new
evidence, and the possible correlations or contradictions therein.
But if
pagans have always found the questions of how to treat others and how to live
in nature relatively uncomplicated, the third question—that of how to please
the gods—is infinitely more shaded. What do the gods want? Study pagan
mythologies and you’ll emerge none the wiser, in part because the gods, like
their human worshippers, seem to consist of little more than appetites and
caprices. But while they may not be understood, they have to be appeased—and
this left classical pagans with a question of a more practical order, namely
what might they possess that the all-powerful deities could possibly want.
Gold,
silver, and other dear things were frequently the answer, but rarely
exclusively: Being the creators of the natural world, after all, the gods could
hardly care that much about things that they can easily forge themselves, ex
nihilo, by virtue of their divine will. And so the pagans scanned the horizon
for something truly precious and exquisite, something whose sacrifice would be
an unmistakable sign of devotion. And, across time and across cultures, they
alighted on exactly the same thing: kids.
At once
the embodiment of innocence and the object of our deepest and most sincere
emotions, children, the most vulnerable of mortals, were the ultimate offering
to the gods—proof that the pagan believer was so certain in his belief that he
would offer up his own offspring to show the gods the strength of his faith,
appeasing them and avoiding potential punishment. So prevalent among the
heathens of antiquity was the practice of child sacrifice that the Torah issued
a strongly worded prohibition against it, in Leviticus 18:21: “Do not give any
of your children to be sacrificed to Molek.”
Child
sacrifice, alas, is alive and well in America these days, too. We may not, like
the Vikings, toss our young into wells as offerings to the heavens, but turn
over every rock in our craggy contemporary political landscape and you’ll find
some pagan policy offering up the well-being of children to the gods of virtue.
In March 2020, to choose one stinging example, Sweden bucked the global trend
and responded to Covid-19 by keeping schools open. The results of this
experiment were available shortly thereafter: Zero dead kids, almost zero kids
sick, and very little, if any, risk to teachers. By January 2021, a study
published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention affirmed that Covid
rates in schools that had reopened were 37 percent lower than
the rates in the same communities at large. The Biden administration largely
ignored this evidence; it took some liberal cities such as New York a full 18
months to reopen their schools.
The
results: dramatic upticks in juvenile mental-health crises, sharp declines in
basic academic proficiency and just about every other metric of human misery
visited on our children. A rational society, to say nothing about one guided by
traditional values, would have curbed this suffering long before it blossomed
so terribly; the pagans instead composed a fanciful narrative of what
constitutes righteous behavior and then forced it on their children, whose pain
was then explained away as a necessary evil if one wanted the forces of science
to vanquish the darkness and cleanse the soul. When Anthony Fauci said, “I am
the science,” he couldn’t have sounded more like the mighty Perun had he worn a
cape and a crown.
Maybe
you’re a kinder person than I, one more inclined than I am to give fellow human
beings the benefit of the doubt. Pandemics are stressful times, and even the
most well-meaning public health officials may be forgiven their missteps when
the entire world is crackling. No sooner had the wrath of Covid subsided,
though, than our pagan witch doctors jumped in with another way to sacrifice
the well-being of the young on the altar of ideological convictions. According
to a recent Reuters report, for example, 15,172 Americans ages six to 17 were
diagnosed with gender dysphoria in 2017; by 2021, that number nearly tripled.
How to explain this stratospheric rise? Have doctors gotten better at detecting
this particular medical condition? Has the science simply improved?
A 2018
study by Lisa Littman, assistant professor of behavioral sciences at Brown,
addressed this very question. Teens, Dr. Littman concluded after studying 256
subjects, were highly susceptible to what she called “rapid-onset gender
dysphoria.” When spending time, particularly online, with groups of people who
favorably discussed the idea of being transgender, teens were much more likely
to become gender dysphoric, a phenomenon Dr. Littman described as “peer
contagion.”
The
paper was accepted by PLOS One, a peer-reviewed scientific journal,
but after transgender activists protested, the article was removed, and a Brown
dean explained that censorship had been necessary because Dr. Littman’s
findings “invalidate the perspectives” of the transgender community. Meanwhile,
the Reuters report also confirmed that the past four years have seen a doubling
of the rates of both hormone therapy and puberty blockers prescribed to teens.
This uptick, coupled with school policies that now actively seek to exclude
parents from conversations about their child’s gender identity, has led
lawmakers in 27 states to draft 100 bills to halt so-called gender-reaffirming
care.
Meanwhile,
the intellectual-industrial complex continues to push its pagan convictions.
The University of Pennsylvania recently announced an anonymous $2 million gift
that would allow it to hire Alok Vaid-Menon, a self-identified “non-binary
transfeminine person,” as a scholar in residence. Vaid-Menon is the author
of Beyond the Gender Binary, a children’s book encouraging young
readers to understand that “man” and “woman” are but two of an infinity of
gender-related options.
But it’s
not merely the hotly debated issues in the center of our cultural skirmishes
that point to the pagan propensity for child sacrifice; it’s the pagan style of
politics itself. A study published in 2022 and led by Columbia epidemiologist
Dr. Catherine Gimbrone examined the longitudinal data collected by the
Monitoring the Future project, which asks high-school students a wide array of
questions about attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. Dr. Gimbrone’s findings were
alarming: Before 2012, there had been no differences between boys and girls,
and none between self-identified conservatives and liberals, when it came to
mental health. Then, depression scores began to soar for liberal girls and rise
considerably for liberal boys. Conservative children registered a far less
significant spike. Put crudely, the obsessive and relentless pagan emphasis on
gender, ideology, and other divisions was literally driving kids crazy.
Writing
about the roles schools played in destabilizing the mental well-being of
children, NYU psychologist Jonathan Haidt and journalist Greg Lukianoff argued
that our academic institutions were practicing “reverse CBT.” While Cognitive
Behavioral Therapy teaches its adherents to catch catastrophic thoughts before
they turn into full-fledged panics, schools were now teaching children to see
the world in black and white, perceive opposing viewpoints as harmful, and
surrender to their worst fears.
***
What,
then, are we to do when confronted with so much lunacy? Three urgent steps come
to mind.
First,
let us realize that all of the above-mentioned permutations are far from
random. They’re not aberrations to be gawked at separately. They’re part of a
cohesive belief system, paganism, that is gripping those who have rejected
monotheistic ethics and mores. This recognition is particularly important
because the pagans themselves vehemently deny it. They print stickers with
slogans like “believe the science,” not realizing that they have just admitted,
however tacitly, that theirs isn’t a logical and rational product of the
Enlightenment but a religious system like any other, complete with its quirks
and its zealotry. Only when it is understood as such can it be confronted; only
if we deny the pagans the right to don a white lab coat or a tie and claim
impartiality can we provide a sober accounting of their actions.
Second,
we must understand that the good, old-fashioned faith traditions that the
pagans so often reject as oppressive, patriarchal, racist, misogynistic, or any
number of other trendy terms have seen it all before. Judaism has been facing
down pagans for millennia now and answering each of their deathly dicta with
sound, humanistic alternatives. Here’s a taste: We were all, the Bible tells
us, created in God’s image, and even though God elected one people to preserve
and protect his Torah, the arc of history bends toward togetherness. God’s
house, Isaiah wisely reports, “shall be called a house of prayer for all nations.”
In other words, while people are different, and while their differences are
meaningful and instrumental in shaping their unique experiences, they also form
the bridge that could one day lead to a common house of prayer. The biblical
story begins and ends with a universalist message; its meaty middle, the story
of the chosen people and their travails, is a crucial reminder that cultivating
our own tribal beliefs and rituals is, ultimately, an exercise in
self-awareness without which we can never truly empathize with anyone anywhere.
Know thyself so you may know others—as credos go, this one is unimprovable and
so much more compassionate than the pagan call for perpetual warfare.
Which
leads us to step three, the most urgent yet most difficult one: Save your
children by shielding them from an ideology that perpetually seeks ways to harm
them; root them instead in traditions that nurture them and give them dignity,
hope, and a future. At the very least, this means refusing to enlist your
children in political crusades, no matter how just they may appear. Resist
hagiographical books about activists and rabble-rousers. Realize that taking
your kids to a march or a demonstration doesn’t make them better citizens—as if
civic duty can be learned by osmosis—but merely ladens them with the anxiety of
ideology, a burden no child should ever have to bear. If you can, rescue them
from pagan schools as well, or, at least, teach them that there are better
options.
When
pagans waving the banner of diversity, equity, and inclusion insist that we
judge others by the color of their skin, not the content of their character,
tell your children that the Hebrew prophets offered a much more
transformational vision of racial justice, one that inspired everyone from
Frederick Douglass to Martin Luther King Jr. When pagans calling themselves
environmentalists tell your children to worship the earth, introduce them to
the Talmud for a superior attitude that is as mindful of production as it is of
conservation. When pagans quarrel and cancel, teach your children the value of
building real communities, and of the tried-and-true blueprints for real human
happiness given to us by our faith traditions.
If we do
that, we may very well discover that history, God bless, always repeats itself:
The heathens ululate and then fold, subdued by the demonstrable advantages of
better faith traditions. We’re long overdue for another cycle of pagan defeat;
let’s do our best to bring it on soonest.
No comments:
Post a Comment