By Noah
Rothman
Tuesday,
April 04, 2023
On
Monday, the recording artist Madonna made an announcement regarding her
forthcoming 35-city world tour: She had added Nashville, Tenn., to the roster.
The stop was occasioned by the murder of six people, including three children,
at a Christian school in that city on March 27. Madonna’s concert is billed as a
fundraiser, but not
for the victims of this particular attack. The show is pitched as a protest
against Tennessee’s allegedly “inhumane” anti-trans legislation, and the
concert will donate a portion of the proceeds to unnamed “trans rights
organizations.”
Madonna
released the following statement:
The oppression of the LGBTQ+ is not only unacceptable and inhumane; it’s
creating an unsafe environment; it makes America a dangerous place for our most
vulnerable citizens, especially trans women of color. Also, these
so-called laws to protect our children are unfounded and pathetic. Anyone with
half a brain knows not to f*** with a drag queen.
It is
important to recall, because it is being forgotten, that this event would not
be held, nor any statement about the fear experienced by transgender individuals
be written, had someone who may have identified as trans not killed six
people.
It’s
easy to compartmentalize the senseless bloodshed that occasioned the outpouring
of support for the “trans
community,” because
that was the intended effect of tortured efforts in the press to link — however
dubiously — the brutal slaying of three school employees and three
nine-year-olds to a metaphysical debate in this country over transgenderism and
young people’s exposure to it.
Whatever
you think of that debate, there is no established link between it and the
violence in Nashville. It’s being shoehorned into the national discussion,
eclipsing any attention that would otherwise be devoted to the torment endured
by the bereaved.
Madonna
isn’t alone in capitalizing on the dreadful news out of Nashville. I’ve discussed this
impulse in the
press, as have Rich and Becket. But it’s still going on. Indeed,
from a casual survey of the media landscape just over a week after that mass
shooting, you could be forgiven for assuming the victims of
this attack were trans rather than the perpetrator.
As
Tennessee mourned, the CBC’s Nick
Logan chronicled
what one gender-studies professor called the “incredible escalation of the fear
factor” allegedly experienced by trans-identifying Americans because “speculation
about the killer’s gender identity was quickly weaponized in an ongoing battle
against transgender and LGBTQ rights.” The Associated
Press echoed
concerns about “anti-transgender rhetoric and disinformation,” which have
“heightened the fears of a community already on edge amid a historic push for
more restrictions on trans people’s rights this year.” Citing some genuinely
provocative commentary on the right, the Washington
Post’s Fenit Nirappil warned that the “attacks against transgender people and
gender-affirming care come at a precarious time for trans rights in America.”
After all, “Studies show transgender people are disproportionately likely to be
victims of violence.”
Okay,
but not in this case. In this case — the case that prompted all this reporting
— it was the other way around. What these reporters and countless
trans-advocacy groups across North America are doing is little distinct from
what Madonna is doing: Using this senseless act of bloodshed to advance their
own narrow objectives.
Think
for a moment about what the people who lost friends, family members, and even
children in this attack are experiencing. They have witnessed the national
press descend invasively on their town only to watch them pivot on a dime away
from them and toward an abstraction. In the process, media appears committed to
muting the pain of the bereaved in favor of the apprehension experienced by
those who identify, to one degree or another, with the person who shattered the
lives of the bereaved and took their loved ones away.
The
victims of this crime have been cheated out of the grief and charity that is
their due. And only to protect an ideological imperative against criticism.
Indeed, it’s an imperative that has taken the form in this case of something
resembling sympathy for the killer. Why else raise without evidence the notion
that the trans community is uniquely imperiled by Tennessee’s laws if not to
establish an at least understandable — if not legitimate — motive?
It’s positively demonic.
No comments:
Post a Comment