By Christine Rosen
Sunday, December 21, 2025
It is perhaps not a question for the ages, but it is one
for our current cultural moment: Why is the left’s political influence
operation dominated by a bunch of shouty, middle-aged white women making
podcasts and TikTok videos?
The Donald Trump era has produced its fair share of
unusual female enthusiasts on the right as well (MAHA moms, tradwives), but the
klatch of mostly blonde women now dominating the political “influencer” space
on the left are a different kind of activist than the pussy-hat-wearing
Resistance types who participated in the Women’s March during Trump’s first
term as president.
Consider Leigh McGowan, a “social media influencer” who
goes by the moniker PoliticsGirl, even though she is middle-aged. Her website
describes her meteoric rise to fame: “She started her YouTube channel in 2015
as a way to inform and inspire because she said, ‘When you understand you care
[sic], and when you care you vote.’” McGowan really began caring “after
watching the fallout from the Trump years” and so relaunched her brand on
TikTok in 2020, “doing rants in her kitchen as a way to engage the younger
generation.” Nothing says “concern for democracy and the children” like
embracing a platform controlled by the Chinese Communist Party!
McGowan, who was born in Canada and became a U.S.
citizen, has no firsthand political experience, yet she does not suffer from a
lack of self-confidence when it comes to telling people what to think about
politics. “People loved her no-nonsense, casual approach and the way she was
able to break down complicated issues into everyday speak,” her website boasts.
“People like her because she’s smart in a way that doesn’t make them feel
dumb,” the site notes, sounding like an influencer koan.
Despite her pretense of offering a new, “no-nonsense,
everywoman” approach to politics, McGowan is in fact just a good, old-fashioned
rabid partisan, albeit one with nice lighting in the comfortable Los Angeles
home from which she broadcasts. Her “kitchen rants” are not a cute marketing
trick. They really are rants. A typical offering from July 2022 featured
comments on the entirety of the Republican Party in the wake of the mass
shooting in Uvalde, Texas. “First of all, f—k you,” she began, in a tone of high
dudgeon, before launching a stream of invective against the GOP, with frequent,
staccato hand gestures and with an expression of permanent outrage on her face.
It is compelling short-form video content. With her blond hair pulled into a
tight, high ponytail, McGowan looks like Barbara Eden from I Dream of
Jeannie—if Jeannie was very angry at Republicans and dabbling in
amphetamines.
Of course, as McGowan told Forbes, “I don’t do the
news…. I explain the news. It’s not about me looking smart, it’s about my
audience feeling smart…. I give the facts in an entertaining way that makes
sense.” Does it, though? McGowan likes to lecture the guests who appear
on her PoliticsGirl podcast about what she thinks is wrong with politics, yet
she seems strangely removed from what politics involves—for example, winning
elections. Talking to California Governor Gavin Newsom in November, she said,
“It is infuriating to watch your own party, who have the better ideas, the
better candidates, who stand up for more people, perpetually lose.”
Equally blonde and middle-aged influencers Jennifer Welch
and Angie Sullivan, hosts of the popular podcast I’ve Had It, forgo any
pretense at explanation and instead embrace what they call “a brand of f—k-you
politics.” The two women, who met in Oklahoma when their children became
friends, soon bonded over the fact that their husbands were “crazier than
s—thouse rats,” as they explained to the Guardian. Their podcast began
as an edgy wine-mom discussion of entertainment news but soon morphed into
discussions of politics. Like McGowan, Welch and Sullivan pose as experts on
matters about which they have no expertise.
When former CNN host Don Lemon interviewed them this
summer at the 92nd Street Y about their new book, Life Is a Lazy Susan of
S—t Sandwiches, the performative aspect of their politics was fully on
display. Talking about former president Barack Obama, among their favorite
political guests, Welch noted, “We both thought about having sex with him
during the interview.”
Welch and Sullivan can at times be charming, as when they
discuss their friendship and parenting issues; they are much less so when they
discuss ideas. Even as they frequently rail against Trump, they have embraced
and expanded upon his vulgar style, referring to him as “Cankles McTacoT-ts,”
for example, and mocking Vice President JD Vance as “Lil Smokey,” which, the Guardian
reports, is shorthand for “Smoky Eyed Failed Drag Queen.”
There is nothing wrong with women indulging their inner
crones while ranting about the “f—kery” of politics on a podcast if they choose
to do so. What’s odd is that the left has elevated them to the status of
political seers, the Democratic Party’s answer to Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson.
And the party continues to send its brightest progressive stars to their shows.
In addition to Obama, guests on I’ve Had It have included Representative
Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, former Vice President Kamala Harris, Senators
Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, and New York City Mayor-elect Zohran
Mamdani.
Popular Twitch streamer and recent Communist
China–apologist Hasan Piker has called the I’ve Had It podcast “the
headquarters of the actual resistance—and not the 2016-era resistance liberals,
the real resistance.” He also approvingly described the show as “the most
radical progressive podcast in North America.”
If that’s true, then it reveals just how far left the
Democratic Party has moved in recent years. Welch’s and Sullivan’s views on
geopolitics are more aligned with Piker and the anti-Semitic progressive left
than with those of the average American voter. After October 7, Welch advised
Democrats to denounce Israel’s war against Hamas and “immediately recognize
that this is a genocide.” To ensure her audience knows where she stands, she
added, “Tell AIPAC to go f—k themselves.”
They aren’t much more subtle about domestic politics. In
December, they hosted former MSNBC pundit Krystal Ball, who went on an extended
rant about non-white people at Immigration and Customs Enforcement. As the
hosts nodded along, Ball called out ICE agents with “a brown skin tone” and “a
dude who looks like his last name is
probably like Lopez or Hernandez or something” and said, “Not only do you not
have morality, apparently you don’t have self-preservation… and you’re the one
implementing the violent force against your own community!” Evidently a bunch
of upper-middle-class white women condescending to minorities while trafficking
in noxious stereotypes is the future of the Democratic Party, or at least of
its political influencers.
Judging by their follower counts and views, a significant
number of Americans are buying what they are selling. McGowan’s online store
features $35 T-shirts that say, “Thank you for caring about politics.” But do
these influencers really care about politics? They seem far more invested in
cultivating their entertainment brands. McGowan is a failed actress whose
website features flattering posts from actors such as Mark Hamill. Welch and
Sullivan are former reality TV hosts who revel in playing to the lowest common
denominator. Boasting to the Guardian about their approach to politics,
Welch said, “You want to go low, we’re gonna go lower… . We need to bully the s—t out of
these guys, because they respond to it.”
Perhaps. But rather like a richer, older, social
media–addled version of Thelma and Louise, they are heroines in their
own minds who are driving the Democratic Party off a cliff.
No comments:
Post a Comment