By Seth Mandel
Sunday, October 12, 2025
We now have an answer to one of the vexing questions of
the October 7 attacks: Whether the carnage was the result of Hamas’s intention
or its disorganization.
Intention it was. Israel has provided, and the New
York Times has analyzed
and confirmed, hours of Hamas communication on that day. Israel also
provided the Times with a written directive that almost certainly came
from Hamas honcho Yahya Sinwar himself. The Times reports:
“‘Two or three operations, in which an entire
neighborhood, kibbutz, or something similar will be burned, must be prepared,’
the memo said.
“In an echo to the memo, just before 10 a.m. on Oct. 7, a
commander from a Gaza City battalion referred to as Abu Muhammed told
subordinates: ‘Start setting homes on fire.’
“‘Burn, burn,’ he said, according to the intercepts. ‘I
want the whole kibbutz to be in flames.’”
“‘Set fire to anything,’ a commander in the northern Gaza
city of Jabaliya referred to as Abu al-Abed said around the same time.”
What about the mass slaughter of civilians?
“Kill everyone on the road,” a Hamas commander called Abu
Muath ordered. “Kill everyone you encounter.”
What about the taking of hostages of all ages?
“Guys, take a lot of hostages,” the commander told Hamas
fighters who said they were killing large numbers of civilians at a kibbutz.
“Take a lot of hostages.”
What about the fact that this brutality was broadcast to
the world?
“It needs to be affirmed to the unit commanders to
undertake these actions intentionally, film them and broadcast images of them
as fast as possible,” the Sinwar memo instructed.
What about the genocidal nature of the attack?
“Document the scenes of horror, now, and broadcast them
on TV channels to the whole world,” a commander from Gaza City instructed
fighters at a kibbutz. “Slaughter them. End the children of Israel.”
So that’s it—riddle solved, question answered. Every
Gazan who stormed through the destroyed border fence that day was a participant
in an explicitly genocidal attack with specific encouragement toward heinous
crimes against humanity and to document it all so there could be no confusion,
no denial, no debate: “Undertake these actions intentionally.”
All of this was obvious from the moment it happened. But
the ranks of Western anti-Israel activists are filled with people trained to
deny the obvious. Now it is fact, and it is undeniable. Every accusation made
against Israel by Hamas’s supporters was pure projection.
One can imagine how frustrating this might have been, at
least at first, to Hamas itself. Its top leadership specifically called for the
entire world to witness Hamas’s crimes, to know they were intentional, and to
inspire others to globalize the intifada along with them. The fact that they
inspired more such ghoulishness among Western activists than random
Palestinians in the West Bank should haunt us all. Gaza became the last true
Nazi citadel, and lots of people in Europe and America thought it was grand.
Moreover, the denialism that crept in was a strategic
problem for Hamas. It contradicted the entire point of the operation.
Just as frustrating must have been the slow development
of the assumption among many that Hamas’s meticulously planned operation was
disordered and disorganized. It wasn’t. It’s just that many Palestinian
“civilians” in Gaza joined in the bloodletting, giving the impression of
randomness.
Why does it matter that the Hamas attacks were so
meticulously organized? Because the idea of “disorganization” has been used by
some in the “pro-Palestinian” chorus to claim that the very worst crimes were
unintended. Gazans kidnapped and murdered and then mutilated the body of a
baby. They were following instructions. Gazans abused defenseless women and
children in horrific ways. They were following instructions. Gazans dragged
elderly people in failing health across the sand into hellish captivity. They were
following instructions.
I suppose “free Palestine” can mean different things to
different people. But to those in America, Europe and Gaza, it means everything
laid out above.
No comments:
Post a Comment