National Review Online
Friday, October 31, 2025
More than a decade ago, the climate scientist Michael
Mann wrote us a threatening letter demanding that we take down a blog post
about his sketchy research by Mark Steyn.
We told him to get lost. We let him know we would never take down the
post, since it was First Amendment–protected speech, and a lawsuit against us
would inevitably fail.
Sure enough, Mann has finally dropped any claims against
us after wasting God knows how much money from his (presumed) financial
backers, and Mark Steyn’s post on how Mann’s famous hockey stick graph is
intellectually bogus and wrong is still right here for your reading pleasure.
Mann boasted that he would destroy us, and we are still
here, alive and thriving, while he is slinking away in humiliation.
Ah, the First Amendment is so inconvenient isn’t it, Mr.
Mann?
Now, it is true that Mann’s suit against us, thanks to
dilatory and irresponsible judges, dragged on for an ungodly twelve years and
drained us of time and resources. Mann also, shamefully, got judgments against
Steyn and Rand Simberg (who posted a critique of Mann that Steyn quoted) from a
friendly D.C. jury. A series of legal reverses for Mann since then, though,
suggest that this purported victory will wash away under scrutiny from more
objective authorities.
As gratifying as the legal outcome in this case is the
fact that Mann and his ilk are now losing the climate debate. All you need to
know about how that is going can be found by reading Mann’s whinging about Bill Gates and the billionaire’s
shockingly sensible new stance on climate change.
We will continue, as we have throughout this suit, to
push back forcefully against Michael Mann–style hysteria on the climate, which
seeks to do so much harm to our economy and society.
Meantime, we want to thank all of you, our readers, for
doing so much to support us in fighting this meritless and harassing legal
assault. We deeply appreciate your donations and your well-wishes.
We are grateful to our counsel, Anthony Dick, for his
wisdom and perseverance, and for the work of his predecessors on the case, our
friends Michael Carvin, Shannen Coffin, and the late David Rivkin.
And we appreciate all our friends on the right — and the
occasional principled supporter of free speech on the left — who have publicly
made the case for us during this suit.
We wish we could thank the American legal system, but it
failed by letting this outrage continue for so long, and Steyn and Simberg are
yet to have their free-speech rights vindicated, although, again, we believe
that day is coming.
As for Michael Mann, he’s belatedly taken our very good
advice from so many years ago, and gotten lost.
No comments:
Post a Comment