By Jonah Goldberg
Wednesday, October 29, 2025
Julius Caesar still casts a long shadow. We have a
12-month calendar—and leap year—thanks to Julius. July is named after him
(though the salad isn’t). The words czar and kaiser, now mostly out of use,
simply meant “Caesar.”
We also can thank Caesar for the durability of the term
“dictator.” He wasn’t the first Roman dictator, just the most infamous one. In
the Roman Republic, the title and authority of “dictator” was
occasionally granted by the Senate to an individual to deal with a big problem
or emergency. Usually, the term would last no more than six months—shorter if
the crisis was dealt with—because the Romans detested anything that smacked of
monarchy.
When Caesar crossed the Rubicon (where
we get that phrase) his enemies in the Senate fled. So, the remaining senators
named him dictator for 11 days to hold fresh elections. His second dictatorship
was set for 10 years, and then finally he was named dictator for life.
In the centuries that followed Caesarism, not dictatorship,
was the real dirty word, at least for lovers of liberty.
Even in America, dictator held onto some of that
“emergency problem-solver” connotation. During the Great Depression, many
Americans craved just such a man. Legendary liberal columnist Walter Lippmann
wrote at the dawn of the Great Depression, “A mild species of dictatorship will
help us over the roughest spots in the road ahead.”
On FDR’s Inauguration Day 1933, the New York
Herald-Tribune ran an approving headline: “For Dictatorship If Necessary.”
Many aides
and Cabinet secretaries were dubbed
“dictators”
in much the same way we sometimes call officials “czars”—as
in drug czars, border czars, even “green
jobs czar,” etc.
Later it was Hitler and Stalin who erased most of the
“Mr. Fix-it” connotation of “dictator.”
But the real cautionary tale was there from the
beginning. Dictatorship—the granting of unchecked powers during a temporary
emergency—is what makes Caesarism possible. By giving one person the “arbitrary power” to
declare war, levy taxes, or hand out favors to sustain his popularity with the
plebes, the temptation to become a Caesar is too great.
Some—like Cincinnatus, George Washington or Abraham
Lincoln—can resist, but all you need is one lesser mortal to be granted undue
power for the whole experiment in republican government to come crashing down.
This was the history of republics until 1789, which is why Ben Franklin
described the end result of the Constitutional Convention as “a republic, if you can keep it.”
The founders were steeped in Roman history. The
Constitution is designed to prevent such temptation. But the founders also
understood that sometimes a president should have extraordinary powers during
an emergency. After all, the institution of a dictator had helped preserve the
Roman Republic for centuries until Caesar’s Caesarism made it an empire.
In short, emergency powers are necessary only during
actual emergencies. There’s a long history of American presidents declaring
emergencies not to solve a crisis but to gain the power crises confer. Joe
Biden tried to use the COVID-19 pandemic to cancel $430 billion in student
loans he had no authority to cancel.
President Trump has declared a trade imbalance a national
emergency. He claims the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of
1977—a law that doesn’t mention the word “tariff”—grants him total, unchecked
power to levy tariffs to deal with that emergency. He’s used that alleged
authority to punish Brazil—with whom we have a trade surplus—because its
current government is prosecuting a Trump ally who also tried to steal an
election.
And just last week, Trump announced that a pro-free trade ad bought
by the government of Ontario using the words of President Reagan is
justification for raising tariffs on all of Canada by another 10 percent. Not
counting oil, we have a trade surplus with Canada, too. And we buy so much oil
from Canada because they sell it to us at a below-market rate.
These are not emergencies. Nor are trade deficits,
generally. Is it an emergency that you have a trade deficit with your local
grocery store?
Trump’s lawyers have argued that denying the president
this permanent and unlimited power would be disastrous, which itself is a
Caesarist argument: I must have unchecked power to keep you safe.
IEEPA requires Congress to review the president’s actions
every six months.
But congressional Republicans have changed
the rules to deny themselves the ability to check the authority Trump is
abusing.
Trump is not a dictator, but as Benjamin Franklin
understood, republics fail not so much because would-be Caesars seize power.
They fail because cowards give it to them—under the false pretense of an
emergency.
No comments:
Post a Comment