By Jeffrey Blehar
Tuesday, September 23, 2025
I’ve got a piece in the newly released November print edition of National
Review (dedicated to “The Trump Effect” on our nation, a year after the
2024 elections) about his singular effect on the media, and I’ve been flogging
it both online and in my various other recent pieces here like a dead horse
over the last week. I’d do that anyway, but in this case, my urgency isn’t
about self-promotion; it’s about how recent events just keep proving my theory
of the case in ever more ghastly technicolor ways.
On Saturday, Donald Trump publicly threatened Attorney
General Pam Bondi on Truth Social in a post that reads for all the world like a private message broadcast in
public:
Pam: I have reviewed over 30
statements and posts saying that, essentially, “same old story as last time,
all talk, no action. Nothing is being done. What about Comey, Adam “Shifty”
Schiff, Leticia??? They’re all guilty as hell, but nothing is going to be
done.” Then we almost put in a Democrat supported U.S. Attorney, in Virginia,
with a really bad Republican past. A Woke RINO, who was never going to do his
job. That’s why two of the worst Dem Senators PUSHED him so hard. He even lied
to the media and said he quit, and that we had no case. No, I fired him, and
there is a GREAT CASE, and many lawyers, and legal pundits, say so. Lindsey
Halligan is a really good lawyer, and likes you, a lot. We can’t delay any
longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility. They impeached me twice,
and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!
President DJT
In case you missed that, what you just read there was the
president of the United States demanding, for all the world to see, that the
attorney general prosecute his personal enemies. In the aftermath of this post,
some on Twitter/X half-seriously suggested that the president had accidentally
“fat-fingered” his phone and published something meant for private channels.
Nah. Presidents do not discuss confidential matters with their attorneys
general over Truth Social. He wants the world to see this.
Later that day, Trump resumed his march to reclaim the
spotlight by announcing randomly that he wanted Afghanistan’s Taliban to
return Bagram Air Base or else . . . what? We would relaunch Operation Enduring
Freedom? You be the judge: “If Afghanistan doesn’t give Bagram Airbase back to
those who built it, the United States of America, BAD THINGS ARE GOING TO
HAPPEN!!! President DJT.” Leaving aside the fact that Bagram Air Base was
constructed by the Soviet Union in the 1950s, the threat is utterly farcical
(and, if taken seriously, makes a mockery of the foreign policy realists who
have flocked to the Trump banner over the last decade). Again, it’s just
another piece of bait, left dangling on the hook for whichever media outlet
foolishly cares to pursue it.
Finally, at Charlie Kirk’s funeral service, Donald Trump
delivered the final oration at a gathering most remarkable for Erika Kirk’s
powerful message of Christian forgiveness and purpose. And again, he found a
way to steal a bit of the spotlight away to make sure the next day’s news cycle
would be properly focused where it belongs: on him. He announced that his administration — under the guidance of
crack scientist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — had discovered the secret origins of
autism and would reveal it the next day. (While the administration proceeded to claim a disputed link involving Tylenol use during
pregnancy, the episode at least gave rise to what may become one of the
most memorable random media images of the year.)
What does it all add up to? Chaos, by design. Covering
the Trump administration in 2025 as a commentator feels a bit like serving as a
French medic during World War I, as everyone is urgently trying to refine the proper practice of triage: deciding which stories are
important, which ones are ephemeral, and which are truly major. (For example,
have you noticed that Trump never bothered sending the National Guard into
Chicago? He got distracted with easier quarry! This was such a predictable
development that it was literally the first thing I mentioned back when he initially floated the
subject.)
At this point, I am beginning to feel a pang of regret
about my coverage of the Trump administration, because it is by necessity
guided by the news of the day — and more than ever, Trump can successfully
dictate what it is that the media, with their limited manpower and attention
span, will talk about at any given moment. Distractions, distractions.
The Most Emblematic Crime of the Week
Good morning, America! We bring you good news: Yesterday
afternoon, ABC announced that Jimmy Kimmel would be returning to the
airwaves tonight; our long national nightmare is over. It is unclear whether he
will issue an apology or a retraction, but he’s guaranteed to make at least
some sort of statement at the top of the show. We’ll see how it goes. (Or not,
as it so happens — let’s admit it, not a one of us is actually going to be
tuning in to Jimmy Kimmel Live! tonight; we’re going to read about it
online tomorrow.)
It is a victory for absolutely nobody, whatsoever. Kimmel
will return, with mildly elevated ratings for a few days, and then fade back
into the ratings obscurity he already currently occupies. He will then be let
go once his contract is complete next summer. Donald Trump and his
administration have already moved on to other matters, and they assume you
will, too. (Incidentally, Donald Trump is suing the New York Times, in a
suit so ridiculous — the initial complaint was dismissed by the court for being 80 pages of praise for
Trump and five pages of allegations — that I haven’t even mustered myself to
write about it.)
But let’s all at least laugh for a moment at the guy who
went and ruined his life over this, shall we? In response to ABC taking Jimmy
Kimmel off the air, an idiot named Anibal Hernandez Santana allegedly decided
to haul out his pistol and head to his local ABC affiliate in Sacramento,
Calif., to unload a few protest rounds into the building lobby,
shooting out a few windows. Nobody was hurt, thankfully.
As San Francisco housing activist Armand Domalewski wrote,
you really can’t make this sort of thing up anymore: “‘Former legislative
director for the California teacher’s union shoots up an ABC affiliate as
revenge for them taking down Jimmy Kimmel’ sounds like a right wing fever dream
and yet it actually happened.” Reality is now lapping imaginative fiction’s
ability to keep up.
I Have Extremely Little Faith in This TikTok Deal
The Trump administration has announced a deal — not yet
finalized — with China to finally get it to disgorge itself of TikTok, the
application currently turning your child’s brain into compost at a speed that
resembles one of those time-lapse videos you were shown in middle school
biology class of a dead fox decaying in the woods. It will not be shut down,
alas — Trump, a creature of social media himself, quite clearly will not risk
his popularity on social media. But apparently, its algorithm will be licensed to Trump’s Silicon Valley allies at
Larry Ellison’s Oracle and Silver Lake:
Under the current terms of the
proposal, the new U.S. joint venture would receive a licensed copy of the
recommendation algorithm that keeps TikTok users endlessly scrolling through
clips on their smartphones. Oracle would review, monitor and secure U.S. data
flowing through the service.
This, of course, was never the issue with TikTok. The
issue has always been twofold: (1) China harvests massive amounts of data from
the American users of TikTok, building a database that can (and someday likely
will) be used against us to no good end; (2) China’s algorithm, which it
controls, cultivates division, dysfunction, and despair in youth society on
an appalling scale. Merely owning a “licensed copy” of that algorithm is not
the same thing as having control over it. It would be like me saying that I
will allow you to watch from a safe distance as I burglarize your house and
steal your car.
So even on a preliminary level, I have little faith in
this deal. Perhaps more will emerge later — the entire process will apparently
take a year to finalize, more proof of how urgently the Trump administration is
treating it. The devil is going to be in the details, and the problem here is
that I have zero faith in either side of this negotiation. I don’t trust
China to really cede control of its all-powerful society-corrupting algorithm —
or the data it returns to Chinese databases — for one moment; I similarly
also do not trust the Trump administration to give a rip about these matters,
either. Forgive me my cynicism, but eight months into the second Trump
administration, I no longer believe he cares about much except his fantasy
economic worldview, his personal profits, and his headlines.
No comments:
Post a Comment