By Kevin D. Williamson
Friday, November
15, 2024
Marco Rubio has finally found a place for himself … on a
Mount Rushmore of putzes.
Oh, sure, he’s kind of the Teddy Roosevelt—the one who
doesn’t really belong—but in joining the ranks of Trump’s first-round
picks—Matt Gaetz, Tulsi Gabbard, Pete Hegseth, etc.—Sen. Rubio is now in a
terrific position to judge himself by the company he keeps. Some of you will
know the old Polish proverb: “Not my circus, not my monkeys.”
Welcome to your circus, Little Marco. Meet the
monkeys.
Rep. Gaetz has spent years dealing with allegations of
misconduct, from using illegal drugs to being involved with an underage
prostitute. His longtime friend Joel Greenberg, who is at the center of the
case, already has pleaded
guilty to a half-dozen felonies, including a sex-trafficking charge. Gaetz,
it bears repeating here, has not been charged with anything, much less
convicted, and, as a legal matter, the presumption of innocence must apply to
even such a specimen as he. But there are degrees of proof short of criminal
conviction. According
to CBS News, the evidence against Gaetz includes testimony from four women
who said they were paid to attend sex-and-drug orgies that Gaetz attended, and
Venmo transactions that show Gaetz making payments to the women. A House ethics
probe, expected to be made public at any moment, will shed light on this.
Pete Hegseth calls to mind Sen. John Tower, who was
nominated to the same position for which Hegseth has been proffered—secretary
of defense—by the George H.W. Bush administration. Tower was eminently
qualified for the position, having served as chairman of the Senate Armed
Services Committee and as the lead negotiator in the Reagan administration’s
arms-reductions talks with the Soviet Union. But he was rejected after leaders
of conservative organizations complained that he was often seen around Washington
exhibiting “a lack of sobriety” while keeping company “with women to whom he
was not married,” as Paul Weyrich, co-founder of the Heritage Foundation, put it at the
time. Hegseth does not have anything like Tower’s qualifications—he had an
undistinguished stint in the military and has mainly worked as a cable-news
pundit—but he has had something like Tower’s social life. In 2020, the Pentagon
rejected his attempt to join National Guard troops chosen to secure Joe Biden’s
administration, one
of a dozen rejected because of links to “right-wing militia groups” and
“extremist” activity. Hegseth insists this is all about a misunderstood tattoo,
a claim that you are free to believe, if you happen to be that sort of
person.
Tulsi Gabbard, who has been nominated for director of
national intelligence in spite of no experience with intelligence work (and no
obvious experience with intelligence of any kind), is a reliable amplifier of
Russian disinformation (remember those made-up
U.S.-run biological-weapons labs in Ukraine that were the “real” reason for
the Russian invasion?) and one of Vladimir Putin’s most able enablers when it
comes to harnessing the conspiracy-kook right to Moscow’s political and
military interests. I don’t think she’s on the Kremlin’s payroll, but I don’t
know what she’d do differently if she were, except perhaps try to be a little
more subtle about her enthusiasm for doing PR for Putin. Her other great love
in public life is Syrian
caudillo Bashar al-Assad.
None of these people has any meaningful experience
relevant to the post in question. Gaetz has a law degree and worked briefly at
a firm in Florida that represents a lot of homeowners’ associations and handles
a lot of real-estate litigation—he never has worked as a prosecutor of any
kind. Hegseth served honorably in Iraq and Afghanistan with the Minnesota
National Guard but has no experience of any kind relevant to what the
Department of Defense actually does. Gabbard is a former Army reservist who has
held elected office off and on since she was 21 years old; before being elected
to office, she was a self-employed martial arts instructor. Gaetz might be a
threat to the intern pool, and Hegseth a threat to the general dignity of the
U.S. government, such as it is, but Gabbard would represent a critical threat
to U.S. national security in the role for which she has been selected.
Since Donald Trump has a weird thing for talking about
Hannibal Lecter all the time, I might be forgiven for borrowing a line about
him from Silence of the Lambs author Thomas Harris: “[His] object has
always been degradation.” Trump is a lifelong specialist in degradation: of the
wives and family he humiliated and dragged through the pages of the tabloid
press as he went from mistress to mistress, of the office of the presidency, of
institutions, of norms, of the public square itself, but, above all, of
individuals. Rubio spent his last gasps in the 2016 campaign imitating
Trump—the personal insults and schoolyard taunting—and spent the years since
perfecting an even deeper imitation of the villain he failed to vanquish. Trump
knows what Rubio most wants in life—to climb up the next rung—and offers him a
chance at it while imposing a high price: his dignity. Rubio may make the
climb, but he’ll do so with these miscreants and lunatics on his back. As
Lecter says to Clarice Starling: “I’ll give you what you love most …
advancement.” Trump has something in common with another world leader to whom
he sometimes is compared: His strength is that he
forces his enemies to imitate him.
When Trump rolled out Rubio and Susie Wiles and the rest
of the respectables, all the usual pundits and podcasters—including a lot of
nominal Trump skeptics constantly on the hunt for an opportunity to praise or
defend him—did the predictable thing and declared themselves pleasantly
surprised and cautiously optimistic (or incautiously optimistic!) about the
administration’s prospects going forward. As though they hadn’t seen this show
before. As though they didn’t know that their praise and defense and agonized
apologia were part of the strategy. It always goes the same way: in for a
penny, in for a pound, even if you decide to make like Mike Pence and suddenly
grow a conscience during your last five minutes in office when you
calculate—wrongly!—that you’ve ridden the Trump train as far as it can take
you.
Rubio often talks movingly about the sacrifices his
parents made in life in order for him to be able to advance. I wonder if this
is what they thought all that was for—if this is the monument they had in mind.
Sen. Rubio certainly has arrived.
Welcome to the circus, senator.
No comments:
Post a Comment