By Rich Lowry
Wednesday, November 27, 2024
DEI is a bad idea whose time came with a vengeance
several years ago, but now its continued ascendancy is in doubt.
Perhaps the most important event this year outside of the
presidential election is the intellectual collapse of so-called diversity,
equity, and inclusion, which is poisonous hokum that is finally being exposed
as such.
DEI has been one of the most morally perverse and
damaging fads in recent American history.
We’ve been spending an estimated $8 billion a year
telling Americans in training sessions, workshops, and educational material
that they are, depending on their race or gender, victims or oppressors, and
that the country is shot through with white supremacy. The DEI mindset is
dominant in human-resources departments and on college campuses.
Common sense says that this racialist hectoring — often
administered by people who brook no dissent — must be unhealthy, and, sure
enough, evidence is beginning to pile up.
Research has suggested that DEI can create negative
feelings or make people afraid to speak their minds. Now comes a compelling new study from an outfit called the Network
Contagion Research Institute and Rutgers University Social Perception Lab. It
found that DEI amplified “perceptions of prejudicial hostility where none was
present, and punitive responses to the imaginary prejudice.”
In other words, if its goal is to create illiberal racial
paranoiacs, DEI is succeeding brilliantly.
In one experiment, the study’s architects gave one group
of students an anodyne essay about U.S. corn production to read while another
got an essay drawn from the work of DEI superstars Ibram X. Kendi and Robin
DiAngelo. Then, the students were asked to evaluate a simple, racially neutral
scenario involving a college applicant getting rejected by an East Coast
university.
The students who had read the DEI material were more
likely to believe that the hypothetical admissions officer in the scenario was
more discriminatory, more unfair, and more harmful, as well as guilty of more
micro-aggressions — again, even though nothing in the scenario suggested as
much.
The Kendi-DiAngelo students were also more likely to want
to require DEI training for the admissions officer, to suspend the officer for
a semester, and to demand a public apology. Why let an absence of facts stand
in the way of punitive measures?
Meanwhile, a report in the New York Times Magazine
found that the University of Michigan’s decade-long, roughly $250 million
experiment in making DEI part of the warp and woof of the school’s life has
been a failure.
“In a survey released in late 2022,” the Times notes,
“students and faculty members reported a less positive campus climate than at
the program’s start and less of a sense of belonging. Students were less likely
to interact with people of a different race or religion or with different
politics.”
Ordinary campus disputes have become five-alarm DEI
crises, administrators complain about all the new DEI-created paperwork, and
students and faculty are afraid to say anything that might offend anyone.
It’d be one thing if it were only the University of
Michigan that had sunk itself in this mire, but this dynamic has been
duplicated throughout corporate America and our education system. There are
signs, though, that the wave has crested. Walmart just announced that it will
stop using the term “diversity, equity, and inclusion,” and end various
DEI-related initiatives. Other companies have been pulling back, as well. The
trend will presumably only accelerate with a new Trump administration hostile
to DEI.
The end of DEI would be a net addition to our collective
life. It would avoid, at best, a waste of time and, at worst, a gratuitous
source of conflict and mutual suspicion. It would roll back the undue power
given to fatuous martinets. It would stop the spread, under the guise of
inclusion, of lies about American society.
The old saw is that socialism hasn’t failed, it just
hasn’t been tried. Well, DEI has been tried, and the dismal results are now
becoming known.
No comments:
Post a Comment