By Noah Rothman
Friday, November 22, 2024
The Washington Post lost a quarter million subscribers after the outfit, which
restyled itself an anti-Trump publication in the latter half of the past
decade, declined to endorse Donald Trump’s opponent in 2024. What seemed at the
time like an act of protest might have been a leading indicator of consumer preferences.
In the wake of the election — one that generated far less engagement with conventional news
outlets than previous elections had — left-leaning cable news ventures have
seen their ratings collapse. “MSNBC and CNN have shed hundreds of thousands of
viewers while Fox News viewership has skyrocketed after Donald Trump won the
2024 presidential election,” The Wrap reported. “That was also the case for
NYTimes.com,” Digiday.com reporters wrote of the paper of record’s online
presence, “which had about 29.4 million site visits on Nov. 5 and 33 million
visits on Nov. 6 2024, compared to 36 million visits on Nov. 3 and 61 million
visits on Nov. 4 2020.”
Some attribute the general decline in media consumption
to the phenomenon of “news avoidance,” but other factors suggest that it might
just as easily be ascribed to reality avoidance. What factors? Take, for
example, the staggering increase in the number of users signing up for Bluesky,
the consciously left-wing platform meant to compete with X .
“Usage of the Bluesky app in the U.S. grew by 519% in the
weeks after the election, compared to the first 10 months of the year,” Axios reported on Friday. The outlet has long
cultivated a left-of-center user base that does what Elon Musk’s social media
venture won’t — namely, censor (they call it “moderate”) discomfiting opinions
that conflict with progressive nostrums. But Bluesky isn’t alone in
capitalizing on the sudden exodus of left-wing refugees from mixed society.
“Lefty, a dating app for progressives, has experienced an unprecedented 453%
surge in downloads in the two weeks since the election,” the report continued.
And the news for Democrat-friendly news isn’t all bad.
While MSNBC, CNN, WaPo, and others are attempting to broaden their
appeal, the outfits that eschew balance in favor of cultivating a far-left
audience are doing fine. “Slate said daily subscription sign-ups were
seven times higher than normal on the day after the election,” Axios added.
“The Guardian raised $2.4 million in two days after the Los Angeles
Times and the Washington Post pulled their Harris endorsements at
the last minute.”
Progressive audiences are fleeing to venues that cater to
their desire to be protected from exposure to the world around them.
Psychically gratifying though that act of avoidance may be, it’s also a recipe
for perpetual confusion and marginalization. Democrats who decline to succumb
to that temptation and learn to communicate with voters outside their tribe are
most likely to begin reconstituting the constituency that Democrats alienated
during the Biden years. If trends among progressive news consumers are any
indication, those Democrats are also most likely to come from more moderate
redoubts within the Democratic ecosystem.
Like stress eting or binge drinking, the progressive
Left’s spasm of self-harm isn’t going to last forever. The impulse will either
subside or claim its sufferers. In the meantime, however, the far-Left has fled
the field.
No comments:
Post a Comment