By Charles C. W. Cooke
Friday, March 24, 2023
Ready for a good laugh? Good. Here’s Sherrilyn Ifill, the
president of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, writing in Slate. The piece is called “The
Republican Plan to Make Voting Irrelevant,” and it begins like this:
On Tuesday, it was reported by NBC
News that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell continues to recover at a
rehabilitation center after his fall at a restaurant in Washington earlier this
month. McConnell spoke with fellow Republican Senators over the phone from the
facility and “sounded like Mitch,” according to Senate Minority Whip John
Thune.
The news brought to mind McConnell’s
exceptional instincts as a political calculator, and in particular his past
cynical and perhaps prescient deliberations concerning his own health. In 2020,
amid reports that McConnell had visited Johns Hopkins in Baltimore after
concerning photos were published showing intense bruising on one of his hands,
the Kentucky Republican began a campaign to pressure the GOP-controlled
Kentucky Legislature to change that state’s law to remove from the governor—who
is a Democrat—the authority to select a candidate to fill the unexpired term of
a departing U.S. senator. The ability of the governor to appoint a nominee to
fill the unexpired term of a senator without restrictions is the law in 35
states.
So, a veto-proof supermajority within the elected Kentucky
legislature passed a law that requires the state’s governor to choose an
interim senator from the same party as the guy who was elected last time
around, and this is an “attack on our democracy” that “makes voting
irrelevant”? Apparently so:
This effort—to remove powers from
elected representatives who are Democrats—has become the new method of
disenfranchising voters and maintaining perpetual Republican political power.
And it is being undertaken with alarming frequency and speed across the
country. This may be the most dangerous and efficient structural attack on our
democracy. Its threat, and pernicious ingenuity, lies in its ability to make
voting itself irrelevant
This is profoundly ridiculous. Again: with an apparently
straight face, Ifill is arguing that it is more democratic to empower
just one of Kentucky’s elected officials to choose a temporary
federal senator than it is for a supermajority within the elected state
legislature to require that that temporary senator be from the same
party as the guy who was initially elected by the people. Ifill
even goes so far as to call this process — a process by which one set of
elected officials has told another elected official that he must respect the
results of the most recent Senate election — “disenfranchising voters.”
(You will be shocked to learn that Ifill makes no mention
of the fact that the change Kentucky has made is already the law in a handful
of other states, including in Hawaii and Maryland, where it presumably serves
to “maintain perpetual Democratic political power.”)
The rest is equally silly. Among the other things that
Ifill complains about are the removal, by the elected governor, of an unelected
prosecutor in Florida who refused to follow the laws that were passed by the
elected state legislature; the removal, by the elected state legislature, of a
Missouri attorney who, by Ifill’s own admission, “admitted to making errors in
her investigation and was admonished by the bar”; and the decision of the
elected U.S. Senate to exercise its constitutional powers to decide who sits on
the Supreme Court.
Hilariously, Ifill concludes her piece with a call to
action that contradicts her initial point. “This should be powerful motivation
for congressional Democrats—and, indeed, for all Americans who wish to live in
a democracy—to turn out and vote this year and next,” she writes, “to save the
framework of democracy while there’s still time.” Turn out and vote? Surely, by
Ifill’s own standards, that power should be invested without exception in
whichever governors happened to win last time around?
No comments:
Post a Comment