By
Michael Brendan Dougherty
Thursday,
March 09, 2023
In an
absolutely shocking piece of “journalism,” the New York Times profiles how
the office of John Fetterman is operating while the senator recovers from severe depression
and a stroke at Walter Reed Hospital.
There is
so much in this report that is wrong, troubling, or outright horrifying that it
cannot be covered in a single blog post or column. Here’s one: “It is not
unusual for lawmakers to be told by members of their staff, sometimes after the
fact, what bills they are co-sponsoring.” This is simply not true.
But the
line that really jumped out at me was this:
When Mr. Fetterman checked himself into the hospital on Feb. 15, the
lead doctor told him that his case was treatable and guaranteed he would get
back to his old self. Post-stroke depression, doctors said, affects one in
three people and can be very serious, but is also highly treatable.
What?
Tell us the name of the doctor.
What
kind of doctor would issue a guarantee that his patient, after
admission into the mental hospital, will “get back to his old self”?
Let me
remind you of what the New York Times reported last month, just days before
Fetterman checked himself in:
It has been less than a year since the stroke transformed him from
someone with a large stature that suggested machismo — a central part of his
political identity — into a physically altered version of himself, and he is
frustrated at times that he is not yet back to the man he once was. He has had
to come to terms with the fact that he may have set himself back permanently by
not taking the recommended amount of rest during the campaign.
“Permanently.”
That is
— in February — readers were being prepared for the idea that Fetterman’s lack
of proper rest after his stroke had permanently impaired his
recovery. But, now, a doctor is confident enough to guarantee the opposite? We
do not know if Fetterman’s stroke will leave him permanently afflicted, or how
he will cope with the sudden midlife loss of some of his abilities. We don’t
know how he will cope with the suspicion that he could have recovered more of
his faculties had he suspended his campaign.
I’m left
with a distressing question: Does anybody care about John Fetterman as a human
being?
No comments:
Post a Comment